Saudi Oil Production
Demand increasing even as they hike prices.
Good luck to us!
[top]
Maybe, but…
It will be tough for the USD index to move up without the CBs and monetary authorities buying it, and that means crossing Paulson and accepting being labeled a ‘currency manipulator’ and ‘outlaw.’
And the higher crude prices mean USD spent on imports increase and unless spending on US domestic assets, goods, and services goes up by that much those unspent USD need to be/are ‘saved’ by non-residents and the USD goes to a level that reflects their current desire to accumulate them.
A rising USD is evidence that the foreign sector wants the extra USDs and are fighting over them. A falling dollar is evidence of the reverse.
Also, if they don’t like the other currencies any more than they like the USD, the currencies can remain relatively stable as the excess USDs are all spent on US exports and US domestic assets. The evidence of this is rising/accelerating US exports and export prices and support for US assets which can include real estate and equities. Note the falling USD has made US equities that much cheaper for non-USD based investors.
This is all part of the same adjustment process, which includes ‘inflation’ as all the pieces described above support higher prices for goods and services both in the US and elsewhere.
And the ‘inflation channel’ also is part of the adjustment of the trade gap. I use the extreme example (hopefully it’s only an extreme example) of prices adjusting upward until coffee is $60 billion a cup, in which case the trade gap of $60 billion per month is only one cup of coffee. In other words, higher prices work to bring down the ‘real’ trade gap.
So they are all working together -trade, fx, prices- within current institutional arrangements (including CBs not wanting to be labeled outlaws and currency manipulators vs the desire to support their exporters, etc) as they always and continuously do to adjust desired to actual ‘savings’ of financial assets, and sustain all the indifference levels.
A turning point if the level of the USD is sufficiently low to drive the US exports and asset sales to non residents needed to keep their residual accumulation of USD to their desired levels.
And with crude prices still rising, it seems likely to me that more USD are being credited to ‘their’ accounts than they currently wish to cling to at current exchange rates, so more downward pressure on the USD would not surprise me. Along with the associated increase in US exports and higher prices in general.
[top]
Still working its way higher.
[top]
Interesting how the price hikes get us back to the 1970s ratio. One of the arguments that it was different this time around was that crude is a lower percentage of GDP than it was then.
The pass-throughs to the rest of the price structure are just getting started, and I expect them to persist well past the peak in crude prices.
The drop in housing starts may be keeping the rental market tight, as about a 80,000 fewer new units are being built each month.
U.S. Apartment Vacancy Unchanged at 5.9 Percent, Rents Increase
(Bloomberg) The vacancy rate for U.S. rental apartment buildings was unchanged at 5.9 percent in the second quarter as the housing slump and a weakening economy deterred people from buying homes, Reis Inc. reported.
The average monthly U.S. asking rent rose 1 percent to $1,047, the 25th consecutive quarter that rents increased or stayed the same, according to Reis, a New York-based research firm.
Home prices in 20 U.S. metropolitan areas declined in April by the most on record and new home sales fell 40 percent in May from a year ago. The slumping housing market means apartment rents should remain steady even as gasoline prices rise and U.S. companies cut jobs, Sam Chandan, chief economist for Reis, said in an interview. Payrolls fell by 62,000 in June and 438,000 in the first half, the Labor Department said July 3.
“Our projection is rent growth will moderate through 2009, but we don’t think it will turn negative as it did in the early 2000s,” Chandan said. “The bias will be weighted toward rental, in our view. People fear home prices will fall further.”
The last time U.S. rents fell was the first quarter of 2002, when they declined by 0.2 percent, according to Reis.
The five-year housing boom that ended in 2006 attracted investment to homebuilding, so fewer apartment buildings were constructed, Chandan said.
“There has been very little apartment development because all the money was made in housing development,” he said. “We don’t have a strong pipeline of apartments.”
San Francisco
San Francisco asking rents grew the most in the second quarter from the previous 12 months, increasing 9.4 percent. New York gained 7.7 percent, Seattle rose 7.4 percent, San Jose, California increased 7.3 percent and Salt Lake City increased 6.1 percent, according to Reis.
New York had the highest average U.S. rent at $2,847 a month, followed by San Francisco at $1,825, Fairfield County, Connecticut at $1,757, Boston at $1,646 and Long Island, New York at $1,521, Reis said.
Orange County, California, ranked sixth at $1,520, followed by San Jose at $1,504, Northern New Jersey at $1,460, Ventura County, California at $1,409 and Los Angeles at $1,408, according to Reis.
New York had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.2 percent, followed by Long Island at 2.9 percent, Central New Jersey at 3 percent, San Jose at 3.2 percent and New Haven, Connecticut at 3.3 percent, Northern New Jersey at 3.5 percent, Syracuse, New York at 3.6 percent, San Diego and San Francisco at 3.8 percent and Minneapolis at 3.0 percent, Reis said.
Bank deputy chief warns of market trouble to come
by Ben Russell, Political Correspondent and Sean O’Grady
Britain is facing the risk of renewed turmoil in the financial markets, the new deputy governor of the Bank of England warned yesterday.
Professor Charlie Bean, the deputy governor for monetary policy and a former chief economist at the Bank, raised the prospect of a slowing global economy triggering a new round of problems with corporate loans and said that the impact of the credit squeeze could be greater than Bank projections.
Yes, but unlike the Eurozone, the BoE is permitted to ‘write the check’ as in the treasury.
National solvency is not an issue in the UK as it is in the Eurozone when weakness is addressed.
He told members of the Commons Treasury Select Committee that Britain faced “major conflicting risks” threatening the Government’s inflation target from the problems of a slowing economy and rising commodity prices.
Yes, the twin themes of weakness and inflation.
In a memorandum to the committee, Professor Bean warned that the “dislocation” in the financial markets “probably has further to run, especially if a slowing economy here and abroad generates a second round of write-downs, this time associated with corporate loans. Moreover, the impact of the tightening in the terms of availability of credit could prove greater than is embodied in the central case in our most recent set of projections”.
Agreed. And while ‘writing the check’ can readily address these issues with no risk to government solvency, it will also support the higher prices he next discusses:
He said that increasing oil and other commodity price rises would lead to higher inflation becoming “embedded in the economy”, warning that people might seek to offset price increases by making higher wage demands. He said: “There is no doubt that the UK economy presently faces the most challenging set of circumstances since at least the early 1990s and probably earlier.”
Professor Bean said oil prices could continue to rise for another two years and cautioned that Britain faced the danger of a pay-price spiral if workers tried to compensate by pushing up wages. He said: “It certainly poses a significant challenge. There is no doubt about that at all. It may be a relatively unlikely event but it could be particularly unfortunate if it happened, if households and businesses start losing faith in the idea that inflation will stay low, round about the target, they start building it into their pay and prices and inflation becomes much more embedded into the system… Provided pay growth remains subdued, the current pick-up in inflation will be temporary.”
Living standards, the deputy governor stressed, will inevitably be lower because of the global inflation in commodity prices.
Agreed. It’s all about real terms of trade, which have also been declining rapidly in the US as evidenced by the drop in growth of GDP and the drop in non-oil trade deficit.
My guess is the most likely political response in the US and the UK is proactive deficit spending from the treasury to address the weakness and higher interest rates to address the inflation.
Unfortunately the deficit spending that supports domestic demand will also support crude consumption (as well as housing) and ‘monetize’ the ever higher crude prices being set by the Saudis, thereby supporting ‘inflation’ in general.
And this will trigger ever higher interest rates from the Central Bank as inflation trends even higher.
Survey | -60K |
Actual | -62K |
Prior | -49K |
Revised | -62K |
Looking soft but not collapsing.
With productivity increases, GDP can remain positive with flat to down job creation.
Survey | 5.4% |
Actual | 5.5% |
Prior | 5.5% |
Revised | n/a |
Working its way higher, but this is a lagging indicator.
Survey | -30K |
Actual | -33K |
Prior | -26K |
Revised | -22K |
Slowly working its way lower in a multi-year trend.
Survey | 0.3% |
Actual | 0.3% |
Prior | 0.3% |
Revised | n/a |
Apparently ‘well-anchored’.
Survey | 3.4% |
Actual | 3.4% |
Prior | 3.5% |
Revised | n/a |
Still moving lower with seemingly along with the labor weakness.
Survey | 33.7 |
Actual | 33.7 |
Prior | 33.7 |
Revised | n/a |
This is falling off as well and indicates a good sized loss of labor hours.
Survey | 385K |
Actual | 404K |
Prior | 384K |
Revised | 388K |
Working its way higher but still not at recession levels, and the floods might have disorted it some.
Survey | 3125K |
Actual | 3116K |
Prior | 3139K |
Revised | 3135K |
Rate of increase seems to be slowing.
Karim writes:
-62k decline in nfp in line with expectations but details on the soft side
Claims rise from 388k to 404k; 4wk avg rises from 379k to 390k.
Continuing claims fall from 3135k to 3116k; 4wk average rises from 3102k to 3110k
Survey | 51.0 |
Actual | 48.2 |
Prior | 51.7 |
Revised | n/a |
Seems to be back near its longer term trend line that was headed lower, and prices keep moving up alarmingly.
Karim writes:
Overall index falls from 51.7 to 48.2 in June.
Activity details also weak and prices paid higher:
[top]
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 163 |
Prior | 166 |
Revised | 174 |
Down some, previously revised up, may be starting to level off.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 3.6% |
Prior | -9.3% |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 342.8 |
Prior | 333.4 |
Revised | n/a |
Up some in the new, lower range.
In the past this level of applications was associated with housing starts maybe 50% higher but what was still considered low levels.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 1269.2 |
Prior | 1212.2 |
Revised | n/a |
Falling off but the number of adjustable rate resets coming due has crested as well.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 46.7% |
Prior | 45.6% |
Revised | n/a |
Moved up some but still well off previous recession levels.
Survey | -20K |
Actual | -79K |
Prior | 40K |
Revised | 25K |
Looks to be continuing its slow grind lower of the last few years.
The Fed sees some of this as long term demographics via a shrinking labor force participation rate.
Karim writes:
ADP for June -79k; has overstated nfp by an average of 77k per mth for past year.
NFP has been weaker than ADP every mth in 2008; it should actually be stronger as NFP includes govt payrolls.
I suppose there is always a first, but it does look like NFP could be well south of -100k tomorrow.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | -14.67% |
Prior | -13.97% |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 234.41 |
Prior | 235.40 |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 5.0% |
Prior | 4.0% |
Revised | n/a |
Better than expected and actually seems to be moving up in general.
Survey | 0.5% |
Actual | 0.6% |
Prior | 1.1% |
Revised | 1.3% |
Better than expected and last month revised up some.
Defense kicking in – may be 2007 spending that was moved forward to 2008.
[top]
Saudi Arabia Not Willing to See Crude at Discount, Naimi Says
by Fred Pals
(Bloomberg) Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, is not willing to sell crude oil at a discount to the normal market price for its grades of oil, the kingdom’s oil minister said.
The country plans to increase production for a third straight month this month. Analysts including the London-based Centre for Global Energy Studies have said Saudi Arabia may need to lower its prices to find sufficient buyers.
“No,” Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi said when asked about his willingness to sell crude at a discount. “Not even for heavy crude. That is not the way the market works. We have said we don’t like high prices. We have nothing to do with where the price is today. Where is the buyer? We would be very happy to sell.”
Al-Naimi spoke to reporters today at the World Petroleum Congress in Madrid.
Right, you can have all you want at their price.
Simple monopoly.
Good luck to us – we don’t even know it’s happening.
[top]
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 0.1 |
Prior | -0.6 |
Revised | n/a |
Muddling through as govt spending and fiscal rebates offer support.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 2.9 |
Prior | 2.8 |
Revised | n/a |
A bit better than expected and seem to be moving higher.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | n/a |
Prior | n/a |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | 48.5 |
Actual | 50.2 |
Prior | 49.6 |
Revised | n/a |
Better than expected, headline looks better than the detail, but holding up well above recession levels.
Survey | 87.0 |
Actual | 91.5 |
Prior | 87.0 |
Revised | n/a |
Breaking out. Question is whether there’s any level of inflation that will trigger a fed rate hike if GDP and financial conditions (whatever that means) stay at current levels.
Karim writes:
Kohn’s speech: tolerate higher unemployment and higher inflation.
Weak, but not recession levels yet.
Government plus exports so far have made up for weak non-government domestic demand.
Survey | -0.6% |
Actual | -0.4% |
Prior | -0.4% |
Revised | -0.1% |
A bit better than expected. Down but not terrible.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | -6.0% |
Prior | -5.1% |
Revised | n/a |
Still near the lows, but a possible bottoming action.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | -43 |
Prior | -43 |
Revised | n/a |
Still looking pretty grim, probably mostly due to higher prices.
[top]