Proposal for the Fed- start a euro depository account for member banks

The Fed has an account at the ECB.

And while banks can have accounts at the ECB, they are not currently segregated from the bank’s balance sheets.
In other words, if you have a euro deposit with a US bank, and the bank fails, you become a general creditor and could lose all of your euro.

This proposal would work as follows:

The Fed would act as agent for its member banks,
allowing them to open euro accounts at the Fed,
with the Fed keeping those euro in its euro account at the ECB.

These accounts would be segregated from the member bank’s balance sheet, so that any bank insolvencies
would not be a factor with regard to these segregated euro deposits.

The member bank must deposit all of these client euro deposits at the Fed.

Functionally, it would be as if the bank’s euro depositors had direct access to the Fed’s euro account at the ECB.

Therefore there need be no capital requirements associated with these accounts.

These accounts would allow global investors access to ‘risk free’ euro deposits.

Currently they must hold deposits in euro banks, national govt. debt, corporate debt, or actual euro cash.

This will help stabilize the euro financial structure and provide a bit of income from service fees for US member banks.

Mosler bonds get their first plug in the Irish media

JOBS CRISIS: Will NewERA really get Ireland back to work?

By Philip Pilkington

Sept 12 (Independent) — Last week President Obama announced a new $450bn stimulus program to promote US job growth and help kickstart the economy. Stirrings from within financial community and commentary from Nobel Laurete Paul Krugman – the two most reliable sources on such matters– indicate that this measure isn’t nearly big enough, but its certainly a step in the right direction.

Meanwhile in Ireland, Minister for State Fergus O’ Dowd announced… well, he announced an announcement. In an interview on Thursday he said that an announcement on the status of the NewERA project – which aims to directly create jobs in Ireland – is ‘imminent’.

So how does the cleverly named NewERA (standing for Economic Recovery Act) add up as a stimulus programme?

The project was originally supposed to be of the order of around €4bn but this figure has recently come under scrutiny from the press who say that senior government ministers indicate that it might be ‘watered down’ due to internal government as well as EU/IMF pressure. Even if the €4bn figure pulls through that’s still only around 2.5% of GDP. That’s less than Obama’s latest offering which, as stated above, is probably insufficient for the US – let alone Ireland, which is in far worse shape.

NewERA is set to be funded through two mechanisms. The first is by raising money by selling off state assets. While all the money from ‘privatisation’ was supposed to go toward paying down government debt, wily negotiators convinced the IMF to slip them a bit on the side to go toward this new investment project.

The second revenue stream is borrowed money from the National Pension Reserve Fund – a fund that has become something of a government piggy-bank since the financial crisis hit in 2008.

The key thing to note is that the NewERA project is that it is not a stimulus package in the typical sense of the term. Stimulus packages are usually implemented by governments using fiscal policy — that is, the government’s ability to create and spend money into the economy. In recessions such stimulus is undertaken by governments running budget deficits.

This means that the government spends money without immediately levying taxes on anyone. This is important as it adds new money into the economy rather than simply taking money out and then recycling it back in. We will return to this very important point in a moment, for now let us take a look at the project itself.

The focus of the project is on infrastructure. To say that such a focus on infrastructure is welcome would be a vast understatement.One of the targets is water infrastructure which, to anyone who has had their water cut off during the cold Irish winter, is of obvious importance.

Another is energy – with a focus on clean, renewable energy – which, given the rising energy prices, will be welcomed by everyone. And finally we have a project to improve broadband access across the country — an extremely important prerequisite to having businesses invest in any given location these days.

Such a focus on infrastructure will also ensure that many of the jobs go to laid-off construction workers. This is the perfect demographic to target as when the housing mania went down the drain so too did many construction jobs, giving rise to high unemployment levels among this group.

Another important aspect to the project is that it will get the debate going on fiscal stimulus. It will also ensure that there is an active government organisation in place to lobby for and help initiate stimulus plans in the future.

This really is one of the most important aspects of the project because, small as it currently is, when the world economy starts getting back on track and international leaders start getting their acts together, we will all (hopefully) have learned our lessons from the last financial crisis and will not rely on asset price bubbles to stimulate — or should I say simulate — economic growth.

This means that governments will have to play an increasingly large role in economies in order to ensure sufficient demand without sending households on any more debt binges. Governments will likely not just have to intervene in terms of regulating banking institutions but also through direct investment to ensure that economic growth continues at a reasonable level without demanding massive private sector indebtedness.

The Japanese, for example, who have been suffering for years after a massive housing and stock bubble burst in 1991, have learned this lesson well. The NewERA project will ensure that there is a precedent for powerful, streamlined government-led investment projects that help-out rather than crowd-out private sector activity. Such projects will be key to stabalising all developed economies in coming decades.

The only issue that can really be taken with the NewERA project is how it’s being funded. Selling off state assets during a slump is never a good idea — “No one would sell assets in this environment,” mumbled one minister in a Dail debate on NewERA this year. And dipping into the National Pension Reserve Fund is a bad habit.

However, the government have little choice and, although this will only provide a very short-term stimulus, it is probably one of the single best economic policies to come out of the current Fine Gael/Labour government so far.

But the obstacles currently faced on spending for the NewERA project will become increasingly apparent as time wears on. When we entered the Euro we gave up our ability to issue currency and with it our ability to spend without revenue constraints – now, as in the case of the NewERA project, we essentially have to make do with what we have.

This will become more and more of a burden in the future as the Irish government gradually learn from the Japanese and come to realise that the only realistic way for households to pay down debt is for the government to increase its spending.

If the Europeans continue to ignore this simple but powerful truth and keep calling for austerity, the Irish will have to do something about this themselves. There are a few options on the table in this regard without dropping out of the eurozone. One is the issuance of ‘Mosler bonds’.

These are government bonds backed with the guarantee that should the government default, the bonds will be accepted to extinguish tax liabilities. There is good reason to believe that these would give the Irish government significant fiscal policy space by driving down yields on bonds as they became a ‘sure thing’ for investors (such a plan would also prevent default).

Other options– such as running a parallel currency – will be discussed by major international figures, including former member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Commitee and leading London School of Economics economist Charles Goodhart, at a conference taking place on the 22nd and 23rd of this month at the Mont Clare Hotel in Dublin.

And a good thing too, as even though all the talk is currently focused elsewhere, this will soon become a pressing national policy concern that people will simply not be able to ignore.

More information on the conference can be found at: http://www.feasta.org/debt-conference or contact info@feasta.org..

Strains rise in short-term eurozone lending

I’ve also heard that borrowers of euro are actually getting cut off which is the stuff of a hard landing scenario.

Strains rise in short-term eurozone lending

By David Oakley

September 8 (FT) — Strains in the eurozone short-term lending markets have jumped sharply this week amid worries that the sovereign debt crisis will deepen, threatening the ability of banks to fund themselves.

The main gauge of tension in the funding markets has risen to levels last seen in April 2009 – and has leapt threefold since July – as banks hoard cash and refuse to lend to each other amid worries loans will not be repaid in a deteriorating financial climate.

Strategists say the eurozone’s financial system would be close to breakdown without emergency loans from the European Central Bank, which they warn cannot last forever.

Nick Matthews, senior European economist at RBS, said: “We are at a key moment in the eurozone debt crisis. There are tensions in the financial system with still many banks having difficulties accessing the private markets for loans. These banks have to rely on the ECB as a backstop. But this is not a long-term sustainable solution.”

Don Smith, economist at Icap, the broker, said: “We have seen a step-change in worries about the banking system because of the sovereign crisis in recent weeks and days. Banks are refusing to lend to each other because of worries over counterparty risk.”

The extra premium eurozone banks have to pay to borrow over three months compared with risk-free overnight rates – considered a pure measure of credit risk – rose to 78 basis points on Tuesday. This spread between Eonia overnight rates and Euribor three-month rates fell back to 74bp on Thursday, but is still 10bp higher than the middle of last week.

In comparison, from January to June, the spread averaged around 20 to 25bp.

Another sign of strain in the eurozone markets is the sharp rise in the amount of money banks are depositing at the ECB. This rose to €169bn on Tuesday, the highest level since August 2010. It remained at elevated levels of €166bn on Wednesday. That compares with €4.98bn on June 15.

Before the financial crisis the amount of money deposited at the ECB was close to zero as banks freely lent money to other banks rather than opting for the safety of parking the cash at the central bank.

Italian banks, in particular, have struggled to access the markets in recent weeks as fears over the country’s sluggish economy and concerns over the government’s commitment to fiscal reforms have worried investors.

Consequently, Italian banks have been forced to borrow more from the ECB. The amount of money Italian banks borrowed from the ECB jumped to €85bn in August, twice the amount of June, which stood at €41bn.

The total amount of loans the ECB has lent to eurozone banks stands at €438bn, with the peripheral nations of Greece, Ireland and Portugal, which have been shut out of the private markets since the start of the year, heavily reliant on central bank funds. Greek banks, for example, have €103bn in outstanding loans from the ECB, double the amount they borrowed at the end of 2010.

Claims/Trade/ECB/Fed/swiss/euro

Seems several reasons Fed unlikely to ‘ease’ further:

GDP continues to move up sequentially since year end

Fed forecasts showing continuing modest growth

Core CPI remains firm

Employment still at least modestly growing (ex Verizon, household sector, etc)

Financial burdens ratios way down indicating the potential for a credit expansion is there.

China and much of the FOMC doesn’t seem to like QE or anything even vaguely related, including long term rate commitments.

Also, with the Swiss ‘peg’ vs the euro, as long as the Swiss remain relatively strong buying the franc, it translates into buying of euro. So this new buyer of euro offers further euro support/deflation to an already highly deflationary environment.


Karim writes:

  • Claims rise 9k to 414k; 400-425k range now holding for about 2mths; not a lot of firing, not a lot of hiring
  • Large drop in trade deficit in July, both nominal and real.
  • Exports rose 3.6% while imports fell 0.2%; supply chain coming back on stream helped industrial exports, while lower oil prices dampened imports
  • Q3 GDP still looking like 2%; forward looking survey measures mixed, with consumer surveys much weaker than business surveys.
  • ECB shifts from ‘inflation risks to upside and policy is accommodative’ to…
  • Inflation risks are ‘balanced’, ‘downside risks’ to growth forecasts (which were reduced), and while policy is still accommodative, financial conditions have tightened
  • While LTROs and SMP help with the transmission of policy, if financial conditions still tighten further, the changed forecasts and biases leave the door open for rate cuts
  • Staff forecasts for inflation were left unchanged at 2.6% for 2011 and 1.7% for 2012; Growth forecasts were cut from 1.9% to 1.6% for 2011, and 1.7% to 1.3% for 2012

EU Daily | Eurozone PMI at two-year low as new orders fall in all countries

Weakness and continued austerity. My guess is it will take serious blood in the streets before policy changes

IMF and eurozone clash over estimates

(FT) International Monetary Fund work, contained in a draft version of its Global Financial Stability Report, uses credit default swap prices to estimate the market value of government bonds of the three eurozone countries receiving IMF bail-outs – Ireland, Greece and Portugal – together with those of Italy, Spain and Belgium. Although the IMF analysis may be revised, two officials said one estimate showed that marking sovereign bonds to market would reduce European banks’ tangible common equity by about €200bn ($287bn), a drop of 10-12 per cent. The impact could be increased substantially, perhaps doubled, by the knock-on effects of European banks holding assets in other banks. The ECB and eurozone governments have rejected such estimates.

ECB Lends Euro-Area Banks 49.4 Billion Euros for Three Months

(Bloomberg) The European Central Bank said it will lend euro-area banks 49.4 billion euros ($71.3 billion) in three-month cash. The ECB said 128 banks bid for the funds, which will be lent at the average of the benchmark rate over the period of the loan. The key rate is currently at 1.5 percent. Banks must repay 48.1 billion euros in previous three-month loans tomorrow. The ECB re-introduced an unlimited six-month loan this month and extended full allotment in its shorter-term operations through the end of the year as tensions on European money markets grew. ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet on Aug. 27 rejected the suggestion that there could be a liquidity crisis in Europe, citing the central bank’s non-standard measures.

Eurozone PMI at two-year low as new orders fall in all countries

(Markit) Manufacturing PMI fell from 50.4 in July to 49.0 in August, its lowest level since August 2009 and below the earlier flash estimate of 49.7. National PMIs held just above the 50.0 no-change mark in Germany, the Netherlands and Austria, but signalled contractions in Ireland, France, Italy, Spain and Greece. Only the Irish PMI rose compared to July, but still remained in contraction territory. The weakness highlighted by the headline PMI reflected falling volumes of both output and new business in August. The Eurozone new orders-to-finished goods inventory ratio, which tends to lead the trend in production, fell to its lowest for almost two-and-a-half years.

European Central Bank Said To Purchase Italian Government Bonds

Sept. 1 (Bloomberg) — The European Central Bank is buying Italian securities, according to two people with knowledge of the transactions. They declined to be identified because the transactions are confidential.

A spokesman for the ECB declined to comment.

Germans, Dutch, Finns to Meet on Crisis Amid Collateral Spat

Sept. 1 (Bloomberg) — The German, Dutch and Finnish finance ministers will meet on Sept. 6 in Berlin to discuss the euro-area debt crisis as a Finnish demand for collateral threatens to delay a second Greek bailout.

“We will discuss how to go forward with this crisis and the future,” Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager told reporters in The Hague today. “It’s about fighting this fire, but more importantly, how do we prevent such a fire.”

Finland’s demand for collateral from Greece as a condition for contributing to a second rescue package has triggered calls for similar treatment from countries including Austria and the Netherlands. De Jager said an agreement on collateral shouldn’t take long to reach.

“I see room for a solution; there are proposals on the table to discuss,” De Jager said. “I think it will be possible to provide equal treatment for creditors without the disadvantage of the proposed deal between Finland and Greece, which is unthinkable because it uses extra money from the EFSF to provide collateral to Finland.”

The 440 billion-euro ($628 billion) European Financial Stability Facility is the euro region’s rescue fund.

Weidmann Says ECB Must Scale Back Crisis Measures to Reduce Risk

Sept. 1 (Bloomberg) — European Central Bank council member Jens Weidmann said the bank must scale back the additional risks it has shouldered to help counter the region’s debt crisis.

Measures taken by the ECB have “strained the existing framework of the currency union and blurred the boundaries between the responsibilities of monetary policy on one side and fiscal policy on the other,” Weidmann, who heads Germany’s Bundesbank, said at an event in Hanover today. Over time this can damage confidence in the central bank, he said. “It is therefore valid to scale back the extra risks monetary policy has taken on.”

The ECB is lending euro-area banks as much money as they need at its benchmark rate and has also re-started its bond purchase program — a step Weidmann opposed — in an attempt to stem the spreading debt crisis. While European leaders on July 21 re-tooled their 440-billion-euro ($629 billion) rescue fund, allowing it to buy government debt on the secondary market, national parliaments still need to ratify the changes.

“Decisions on taking further risks should be made by governments and parliaments, as only they are democratically legitimized,” Weidmann said.

He said one option for a long-term solution to Europe’s debt crisis could be “a real fiscal union.”

“Should one be unwilling or unable to take this path, then the existing no-bailout clause in the treaties, and the accompanying disciplining of fiscal policy, should be strengthened instead of being completely gutted,” he said.

Weidmann said his comments don’t relate to current economic developments or ECB policy, citing the one-week blackout prior to a rate decision. ECB officials will convene on Sept. 8 in Frankfurt.

German manufacturing PMI lowest since September 2009

(Markit) At 50.9, down from 52.0 in July, the final seasonally adjusted Markit/BME Germany PMI was around one index point lower than the ‘flash’ figure of 52.0. Growth of German manufacturing output eased fractionally since the previous month and was the slowest since July 2009. Latest data pointed to a fall in intakes of new work for the second month running and the rate of contraction was the fastest since June 2009. The downturn in sales to export markets was highlighted by a further reduction in new business from abroad in August, with the rate of contraction also the sharpest for over two years. Meanwhile, stocks of finished goods at manufacturing firms accumulated at the steepest pace since the survey began in April 1996.


German Trade, Consumption Damped Second-Quarter GDP Growth

(Bloomberg) Private consumption contracted 0.7 percent in the second quarter. GDP increased 0.1 percent from the first quarter, when it gained 1.3 percent, the office said, confirming its initial Aug. 16 estimate. Exports rose 2.3 percent from the first quarter, when they gained 2.1 percent. Imports surged 3.2 percent in the second quarter after rising 1.7 percent in the first. That resulted in net trade reducing GDP growth by 0.3 percentage point. Companies stocked up inventories, which contributed 0.7 percentage point to GDP growth. Gross investment also added 0.7 percentage point to growth. Private consumption subtracted 0.4 percentage point and a 0.9 percent decline in construction spending cut 0.1 percentage point off GDP.

Carrefour posts net loss in 1st half

(AP) Europe’s largest retailer Carrefour SA posted an unexpected net loss in the first half and abandoned its growth target for the year amid the economic slowdown. The French retailer reported a net loss of euro249 million ($359 million) in the first six months of the year, compared with a profit of euro97 million a year earlier. Carrefour said it expects its operating profit to decline this year, reversing a target the retailer set in March when it said an ongoing and expensive “transformation plan” would raise profits this year. As it did last year, Carrefour booked what it calls “significant one-off charges” again in the first half. They amounted to euro884 million in the first half, over half of which went to writing down the value of Carrefour’s Italian assets.

Greece set to miss deficit target

(AP) Greece is likely to miss its budget targets in 2011 even if it fully implements painful reforms a parliamentary panel of financial experts said. “The increase in the primary deficit in combination with a further drop in economic activity strengthens significantly the dynamics of debt, offsetting the benefits from the decisions of the summit of July 21, and distancing the possibility of stabilization of the debt to GDP in 2012,” the panel, known as the State Budget Office, wrote in a report. Citing government figures, it said the 2011 January-July deficit stands at euro15.59 billion ($22.53 billion) with a primary deficit of 2.4 percent of gross domestic product, as opposed to a euro12.45 billion ($17.99 billion) shortfall and 1.5 percent primary deficit in that period last year.

Italy Drops Pension Changes, Will Announce Budget Amendments

(Bloomberg) The Italian government has dropped proposed changes to pension rules agreed to this week from a 45.5 billion-euro ($65.5 billion) austerity plan being discussed in parliament that aims to balance the budget by 2013. Giorgia Meloni, minister for youth and sport policy, told reporters that the government decided to withdraw the proposal agreed to by Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and Finance Minister Giulio Tremonti two days ago. On Aug. 29, Berlusconi’s office announced that the government had dropped a planned bonus tax on Italians earning more than 90,000 euros a year and reduced cuts in transfers to regional and local authorities. It did not provide details of how the lost deficit reduction of 4.5 billion euros from those changes would be compensated.

Crisis exposes weakness of Italian coalition

(FT) Giulio Tremonti, finance minister, was said to be in “damage limitation” mode on Wednesday, seeking to assure Italy’s partners that a budget could still get through parliament’s twin chambers by the end of next week, despite prime minister Silvio Berlusconi’s decision to jettison some key proposals, including a wealth tax. Three weeks after the centre-right cabinet agreed an austerity package – with €45.5bn ($65.4bn) of savings intended to balance the budget by 2013 – the government on Wednesday missed its self-imposed deadline to present legislation to the senate, the first step towards parliamentary approval. Insiders admit, however, that the budget could amount to a stopgap measure, the second since July, and might need to be reinforced at a later date.

Spanish PM: deficit cap amendment essential

(AP) “It is true that it is a reform done in a very short time span, because we need it,” Prime minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero said. The amendment of the 1978 constitution enshrines the principle of budgetary discipline into Spain’s constitution, but does not specify numbers. These will come in a separate law that is to be passed by June 2012. The Socialists and conservatives have agreed the law will stipulate that Spain’s deficit cannot exceed 0.4 percent of GDP, but that threshold will not take effect until 2020. Their support is enough for the bill to pass when it is voted on Friday in the lower house of Parliament and presumably next week in the Senate. Time is pressing because the legislature dissolves Sept. 27 in order to get ready for general elections Nov. 20.

Spain Expects ‘Chain’ of Market Turbulence, Valenciano Says

(Bloomberg) “We’re probably going to get back into a chain of financial turbulence in September and October,” Elena Valenciano, Socialist party campaign chief, said in an interview. Valenciano said the constitutional amendment is necessary as Spain must avoid following Greece, Ireland and Portugal into seeking a European bailout. “We have to say this because sometimes talking of a rescue seems almost something positive: any kind of intervention in Spain would be a great misfortune for the country,” she said. Valenciano said authorities “didn’t expect August to be as bad as it was” and that the gap may widen again in the next two months, “not so much because of our own debt, but because of Italy’s debt.”

Portugal Raises Taxes to Meet Deficit Targets in Rescue Plan

(Bloomberg) Portugal will raise capital gains tax and increase levies on corporate profit and high earners to reach the deficit-reduction goals in its 78 billion-euro ($112 billion) bailout. The government will impose a tax surcharge of 3 percent on companies with income above 1.5 million euros, add a bonus tax of 2.5 percent on the highest earners and raise the levy on capital gains by 1 percentage point to 21 percent, Finance Minister Vitor Gaspar said. The moves will help trim the budget deficit from 5.9 percent of gross domestic product this year to the European Union ceiling of 3 percent in 2013, he said. The shortfall will narrow to 0.5 percent in 2015. The government will reduce its deficit even as the economy contracts 2.2 percent this year and 1.8 percent next year, before expanding 1.2 percent in 2013, he said.

Ireland’s unemployment rate rises to 14.4 percent

(AP) Ireland’s unemployment rate has risen to 14.4 percent. Ireland has been trying to escape its 3-year recession through export growth led by its multinational companies. But the domestic economy remains dormant because of weak consumer demand, high household debts and a collapsed real-estate market. The Central Statistics Agency said Wednesday that unemployment rose from July’s rate of 14.3 percent, the fourth straight monthly increase. A record-high 470,000 people in Ireland, a country of 4.5 million, are claiming welfare payments for joblessness. About 17 percent are foreigners, chiefly Eastern Europeans who immigrated during the final years of Ireland’s 1994-2007 Celtic Tiger boom.

I’m ok, eur ok?

First, the euro funding issue/crisis could vanish with a simple announcement, like:

The ECB hereby guarantees all the debt of the national governments.

But they won’t do that.
They are worried about their ability to subsequently enforce the Growth and Stability Pact, which has already proven unenforceable.

In fact, the only enforcement tool for austerity seems to rest with the ECB, which conditions its funding on austerity.

This is also the disciplinary principle behind my proposed ECB annual revenue distribution of maybe 10% of euro zone GDP to the national govts on a per capita basis-
The ECB would have the right to withhold future distributions to members who fail to comply with deficit rules. But this proposal isn’t even a consideration, so not likely to happen.

Mosler bonds (in the case of default they can be used for payment of taxes) for individual euro nations offer real hope, but time is short and the political process long.

That leaves the euro zone with what it’s been doing all along.
Muddle along anticipating, entertaining, debating, various funding proposals,
but ultimately,
when it gets bad enough,
relying on the ECB writing the check and buying national govt debt in the market place to facilitate ongoing funding.

All contingent with the member nation in question complying with terms and conditions of austerity set by the ECB.

It’s all highly deflationary, strong euro medicine, while it lasts.
It’s also operationally sustainable.
And phase 1- where austerity reduces deficits- has proven politically sustainable as well.

However we may now be entering phase 2,
where austerity results in falling GDP and higher deficits for all the euro members.
Yes, it’s operationally sustainable and continues to support the euro.

So the question is whether austerity measures intended to bring deficits down, that instead cause deficits to increase, are politically sustainable.

And, if not, what next?
And when?
How bad does it all have to get before they change policy?
And what change would that be?
The first step would probably be some ‘new’ form of QE,
and maybe even an interest rate cut,
which only make things worse,
as they wait for the appropriate lag before said policy ‘kicks in’.

And how long would it all continue to deteriorate before they stop waiting for it to ‘kick in’ and again change policy?

US deficit reduction round 2 coming soon as well.

To again quote that carpenter working on his piece of wood,
‘no matter how many times i cut it, it’s still too short’.

Is a misguided fuss over a reserve drain going to bring down global capitalism?

France getting fried

As previously discussed,
back in the days before the euro, every few years the large French banks would take what were then massive write offs, with the French govt. writing the check and adding a bit to the French govt’s budget deficit, and life went on.

The idea that after switching to the euro French banks would suddenly upgrade their underwriting to the point where the periodic massive write offs would no longer take place seemed illogical to me.

So along those lines, after a dozen or so years with no major losses, it’s very possible some very large loan losses could be about to surface.

The way this hurts the US is through equity valuations for companies that trade with the euro zone, as well as currency translations of assets and earnings should the euro fall.

THE CATALYST FOR LOWER STOCK PRICES IS COMING OUT OF EUROPE..SPECIFICALLY FRANCE.. THE RUMORS OF FRANCE BEING DOWNGRADED SEEM TO BE UNFOUNDED, BUT CDS CONTINUES TO WIDEN.. THIS MORNING, SARKOZY CAME IN FROM HIS CHATEAU TO HEAD UP HIS WEEKLY WEDNESDAY MEETING. THE DIFFERENCE WAS THAT BANK OF FRANCES NOYER WAS IN ATTENDANCE, WHICH IS UNUSUAL…THE MARKET IS SPECULATING THAT A FRENCH BANK IS IN TROUBLE… SOCGEN STOCK IS DOWN OVER 20%….THE REAL BENEFICIARIES OF TRADING ARE THE UK AND GERMANY IN THAT ORDER…UK 10 YEARS ARE 23 BETTER, GERMANY 16 BETTER AND FRANCE 14 BETTER… THE EURO HAS GONE FROM 1.44 TO 1.418 TODAY.. AGAIN…SOCGEN IS THE RUMOR..WE SAW IT ON MONDAY IN A BB ARTICLE..WE HEAR IT AGAIN TODAY…

QE Euro Style

It’s more of the same in the euro zone.

It all goes bad until, finally, when it gets bad enough,
the ECB writes the check and buys the bonds of whatever nation is in trouble.
Along with the usual imposition of austerity terms and conditions.

When the US and Japan do qe, they purchase their own liabilities
(the Treasury and Fed, BoJ and MoF, are central govt agencies under control of the national legislature)

When the ECB does QE, it buys the bonds of the euro member nations.
This would be analogous to the Fed buying the bonds of US states with funding problems.

In the US the Treasury took on the bulk of the counter cyclical deficit spending, with the states taking on a bit.

In the euro zone, the member nations took on all of the counter cyclical deficit spending, and buried themselves.
Like the US states, and unlike the Fed and the ECB, the euro member nations are credit sensitive entities.
And they are way over the practical limits of what markets will fund when push comes to shove.
So now the ECB is, reluctantly and as a last resort, taking the ‘burden’ of that deficit spending from the national govts to keep them afloat. (and imposing terms and conditions of austerity)

And the way things are going it will ultimately have to take on a lot.
Looks to me like that means multi trillions, just like the US federal govt does for it’s currency union.

Operationally this is no problem.
But politically the ECB has a politically imposed capital constraint that will most likely need to be addressed before too long.

And based on the way China blew it’s lid over US style QE and debt ceiling discussions, the question is how it might react to euro style QE, ECB capital discussions or discussion of haircuts of China’s holdings?

And the fact that neither qe nor QE are inflationary as they don’t add anything to aggregate demand,
may again mean nothing to China and much of the rest of the world who continue to believe it’s some kind of reckless and inflationary money printing.

Consumer credit up, Friday update

It doesn’t look to me like anything particularly bad has actually yet happened to the US economy.

The federal deficit is chugging along at maybe 9% of US GDP, supporting income and adding to savings by exactly that much, so a collapse in aggregate demand, while not impossible, is highly unlikely.

After recent downward revisions, that sent shock waves through the markets, so far this year GDP has grown by .4% in Q1 and 1.2% in Q2, with Q3 now revised down to maybe 2.0%. Looks to me like it’s been increasing, albeit very slowly. And today’s employment report shows much the same- modest improvement in an economy that’s growing enough to add a few jobs, but not enough to keep up with productivity growth and labor force growth, as labor participation rates fell to a new low for the cycle.

And, as previously discussed, looks to me like H1 demonstrated that corps can make decent returns with very little GDP growth, so even modestly better Q3 GDP can mean modestly better corp profits. Not to mention the high unemployment and decent productivity gains keeping unit labor costs low.

Lower crude oil and gasoline profits will hurt some corps, but should help others more than that, as consumers have more to spend on other things, and the corps with lower profits won’t cut their actual spending and so won’t reduce aggregate demand.

This is the reverse of what happened in the recent run up of gasoline prices.

Japan should be doing better as well as they recover from the shock of the earthquake.

Yes, there are risks, like the looming US govt spending cuts to be debated in November, but that’s too far in advance for today’s markets to discount.

A China hard landing will bring commodity prices down further, hurting some stocks but, again, helping consumers.

A euro zone meltdown would be an extreme negative, but, once again, the ECB has offered to write the check which, operationally, they can do without limit as needed. So markets will likely assume they will write the check and act accordingly.

A strong dollar is more a risk to valuations than to employment and output, and falling import prices are very dollar friendly, as is continuing a fiscal balance that constrains aggregate demand to the extent evidenced by the unemployment and labor force participation rates. And Japan’s dollar buying is a sign of the times. With US demand weakening, foreign nations are swayed by politically influential exporters who do not want to let their currency appreciate and risk losing market share.

The Fed’s reaction function includes unemployment and prices, but not corporate earnings per se. It’s failing on it’s unemployment mandate, and now with commodity prices coming down it’s undoubtedly reconcerned about failing on it’s price stability mandate as well, particularly with a Fed chairman who sees the risks as asymmetrical. That is, he believes they can deal with inflation, but that deflation is more problematic.

So with equity prices a function of earnings and not a function of GDP per se, as well as function of interest rates, current PE’s look a lot more attractive than they did before the sell off, and nothing bad has happened to Q3 earnings forecasts, where real GDP remains forecast higher than Q2.

So from here, seems to me both bonds and stocks could do ok, as a consequence of weak but positive GDP that’s enough to support corporate earnings growth, but not nearly enough to threaten Fed hikes.

Consumer borrowing up in June by most in 4 years

By Martin Crutsinger

May 25 (Bloomberg) — Americans borrowed more money in June than during any other month in nearly four years, relying on credit cards and loans to help get through a difficult economic stretch.

The Federal Reserve said Friday that consumers increased their borrowing by $15.5 billion in June. That’s the largest one-month gain since August 2007. And it is three times the amount that consumers borrowed in May.

The category that measures credit card use increased by $5.2 billion — the most for a single month since March 2008 and only the third gain since the financial crisis. A category that includes auto loans rose by $10.3 billion, the most since February.

Total consumer borrowing rose to a seasonally adjusted annual level of $2.45 trillion. That was 2.1 percent higher than the nearly four-year low of $2.39 trillion hit in September.