King Says U.K. Recovery May Be ‘Long, Hard Slog’


[Skip to the end]

So how about recommending a suspension VAT for a bit???

King Says U.K. Recovery May Be ‘Long, Hard Slog’

by Robert Schmidt

June 24 (Bloomberg) — “There has to be a risk that it will be a long, hard slog” because of the problems in the banking system, King told lawmakers in London today. “I feel more uncertain now than ever. This is not the pattern of a recession coming into recovery that we’ve seen since the 1930s. Having an open mind and not pretending to foresee the future when it’s so uncertain is important.”

King said that there’s “not much evidence to change our view” since the bank released forecasts in May showing that the economy won’t return to growth on an annual basis until the second half of next year.


[top]

Nonsense from Wells Fargo


[Skip to the end]

Please send this on to Eugenio Aleman at Wells Fargo

Thinking The Unthinkable: The Treasury Black Swan, And The LIBOR-UST Inversion

Posted by Tyler Durden

>   The below piece is a good analysis of a hypothetical Treasury/Dollar black swan
>   event, courtesy of Eugenio Aleman from, surprisngly, Wells Fargo. Eugenio does
>   the classic Taleb thought experiment: what happens if the unthinkable become
>    not just thinkable, but reality. Agree or disagree, now that we have gotten to
>   a point where 6 sigma events are a daily ocurrence, it might be prudent to
>   consider all the alternatives.

In previous reports, I have touched upon the concerns I have regarding the overstretching of the federal government as well as of monetary policy while the Federal Reserve tries to maintain its independence and its ability, or willingness, to dry the U.S. economy of the current excess liquidity.

Excess reserves are functionally one day Treasury securities.
It’s a non issue.

Furthermore, we heard this week the Fed Chairman’s congressional testimony on the perils of excessive fiscal deficits and the effects these deficits are having on interest rates at a time when the Federal Reserve is intervening in the economy to try to keep interest rates low.

His thinking is still on the gold standard in too many ways.

Now, what I call “thinking the unthinkable” is what if, because of all these issues, individuals across the world start dumping U.S. dollar notes, i.e., U.S. dollar bills?

The dollar would go down for a while.
Prices of imports would go up.
Exports would go up for a while

All assuming the other nations would let their currencies appreciate and let their exporters lose their hard won US market shares, which is certainly possible, though far from a sure thing.

Why? Because one of the advantages the U.S. Federal Reserve has over almost all of the rest of the world’s central banks is that there seems to be an almost infinite demand for U.S. dollars in the world, which has made the Federal Reserve’s job a lot easier than that of other central banks, even those from developed countries.

In what way? They set rates, that’s all. It’s no harder or easier for the Fed than any other central bank.

if there is a massive run against the U.S. dollar across the world then the Federal Reserve will have to sell U.S. Treasuries to exchange for those U.S. dollars being returned to the country, which means that the U.S. Federal debt and interest payments on that debt will increase further.

Not true. First, they have a zero rate policy anyway so they can just sit as excess reserves should anyone deposit them in a bank account, and earn 0. Or they can hold the cash and earn 0.

This means that we will go from paying nothing on our “currency” loans to having to pay interest on those U.S. Treasuries that will be used to sterilize the massive influx of U.S. dollar bills into the U.S. economy, putting further pressure on interest rates.

No treasuries have to sold to sterilize anything.
A little knowledge about monetary operations would go a long way towards not letting this nonsense be published in respectable forums.

If we add the nervousness from Chinese officials regarding U.S. debt issues, then we understand the reason why we had Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner in China last week “calming” Chinese officials concerned with the massive U.S. fiscal deficits. I remember similar trips from the Bush administration’s Treasury officials pleading with Chinese officials for them to continue to buy GSEs (Freddie Mac and Freddie Mae) paper just before the financial markets imploded.

Yes, they have it wrong, and it’s making the administration negotiate from a perceived position of weakness while the Chinese and others take us for fools.

But the situation today is even more delicate because of the impressive amounts of U.S. Treasuries s we will have to issue during the next several years in order to pay for all the programs we have put together to minimize the fallout from this crisis.

Issuing Treasuries does not pay for anything. Spending pays for things, and spending is not operationally constrained by revenues.

The Treasuries issued support interest rates. They don’t ‘provide’ funds.

Furthermore, if China and other countries do not keep buying U.S. Treasuries, then interest rates are going to skyrocket.

There’s some hard scientific analysis. They go to the next highest bidder. The funds to pay for the securities come from government spending/Fed lending, so by definition the funds are always there and the term structure of rates is a matter of indifference levels predicated on future fed rate decisions.

This is one of the reasons why Bernanke was so adamant against fiscal deficits in his latest congressional appearance.

And because on a gold standard deficits can be deadly and cause default. He’s still largely in that paradigm that’s long gone.

Of course, the U.S. government knows that the Chinese are in a very difficult position: if they don’t buy U.S. Treasuries, then the Chinese currency is going to appreciate against the U.S. dollar and thus Chinese exports to the U.S., and consequently, Chinese economic growth will falter.

Yes, as I indicated above.

The U.S. and China are like Siamese twins joined at the chest and sharing one heart. This is something that will probably keep Chinese demand for Treasuries elevated during the next several years. However, this is not a guarantee, especially if the Chinese recovery is temporary and they have to keep on spending resources on more fiscal stimulus rather than on buying U.S. Treasuries.

Again, this shows no understanding of monetary operations and reserve accounting. The last two are not operationally or logically connected.

Thus, my perspective for the U.S. dollar is not very good. And now comes the caveat. Having said this, what is the next best thing? Hugo Chavez’s Venezuelan peso? Putin’s Russian rubble? The Iranian rial? The Chinese renminbi? Kirchner’s Argentine peso? Lula da Silva’s Brazilian real? That is, the U.S. dollar is still second to none!


[top]

Bernanke to ‘deploy all tools’ except the right ones


[Skip to the end]

The right tools have yet to be deployed:

  1. Lending to member banks on an unsecured basis (demanding collateral is redundant).
     
  2. Providing banks with term financing at rates set by the FOMC (mortgage rates, etc. can be directly set as desired).
     
  3. Prohibiting bank sales of financial assets (buy and hold only and no interbank markets).
     

Instead we have the results of a government that doesn’t understand its own monetary arrangements and has implemented policy that for the most part has made a difficult situation all the more difficult.

Feel free to distribute for comment!

Bernanke Says Fed to ‘Deploy All Tools’ for Economic Revival

by Steve Matthews

March 7 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank will “forcefully” use every resource to restore financial-market stability and revive U.S. economic growth.

“We will continue to forcefully deploy all the tools at our disposal as long as necessary to support the restoration of financial stability and the resumption of healthy economic growth,” Bernanke said in prepared remarks for an event today in Dillon, South Carolina. The Fed chief returned to his hometown to attend a ceremony naming a highway interchange after him.

Bernanke didn’t comment on specific Fed policies in his remarks. He said he was aware Dillon now “faces challenges” with the economy in a recession.


[top]

Re: ECB ending Fed swap lines!


[Skip to the end]

(email exchange)

>   
>   On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Scott wrote:
>   
>   ECB says to discontinue US dollar swap OPS from end Jan.
>   
>   I guess they don’t want euro to strengthen!
>   

Exactly!

This is the new century version of ‘competitive devaluations.’

Paulson moved first by talking foreign CB’s out of buying USD reserves.

Bernanke thought he was helping with rate cuts.

China said ‘no mas’ a while back started ‘letting’ the yuan depreciate, probably via USD purchases.

Japan recently announced ‘no mas’ and that they were prepared to resume USD buying to abort yen appreciation.

If the ECB in fact cuts off its banks ‘cold turkey’ from the Fed’s $ the shock can be enormous.

Ramifications:

Upward pressure on USD LIBOR.

Downward pressure on the euro.

Upward pressure on eurozone credit default premiums.

Falling US equities.

Etc.

ECB to Discontinue Dollar Swap Tenders From the End of January

By Jana Randow

Dec. 19 (Bloomberg) — The European Central Bank said it will discontinue its euro-dollar foreign exchange swap tenders at the end of January due to “limited demand.”

Right! Only $300 billion outstanding.

The ECB will continue to loan banks in Europe as many dollars as they need for terms of 7, 28 and 84 days in exchange for eligible collateral, the Frankfurt-based central bank said in a statement today. Dollar swaps “could be started again in the future, if needed in view of prevailing market circumstances,” the ECB added.

Those circumstances being the strong euro?


[top]

ECB funding national government securities


[Skip to the end]

ECB cuts to 2.5pc and mulls “printing money”

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

The Maastricht Treaty prohibits the ECB from injecting stimulus by purchasing the government debt of the eurozone’s fifteen states debt — a method known as “monetizing the deficit” or, more crudely, as “printing money.”

But it can achieve the same effect

not quite

by mopping up sovereign debt, mortgage securities, or even company debt on the open market, as the Fed has already begun to do. At the moment the ECB accepts some of these assets as collateral in exchange for loans, but it has not yet hit the atomic button by buying them outright with its own freshly-minted fiat money.

When the ECB accepts collateral for loans, it doesn’t offer non recourse funding. The owner of the securities remains liable in the case of default.


[top]

Bloomberg: Trichet says U.S. must pass plan to rescue ‘Global Finance’


[Skip to the end]

Interesting how Europe feels its fate is in the hands of the US.

The Euro was supposed to change all that.

Yes, the national governments know they are constrained fiscally by their self imposed 3% deficit limits. And they also suspect that they are further limited by market forces that may decide not to buy the national government securities and cut off their ability to borrow to spend. The national governments are in that respect similar to the US states which are currently pro-cyclically cutting spending due to funding constraints due to lack of income.

Unlike the US and the UK, in the Eurozone the national governments are providing the deposit insurance for their banks.

It can all come apart very quickly.

They can blame the US, but the fault lies with their failure to be able to sustain domestic demand, which they built into the treaty 10 years or so ago.

Good chance market forces will ultimately force modifications to the treaty.

My highlights in yellow below:

Trichet Says U.S. Must Pass Plan to Rescue `Global Finance’


by Andreas Scholz and Gabi Thesing
Oct. 1 (Bloomberg) European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said U.S. lawmakers must pass a $700 billion rescue package for banks to shore up confidence in the global financial system.

“It has to go, for the sake of the U.S. and for the sake of global finance,” Trichet said in an interview in Frankfurt with Bloomberg Television late yesterday. “I am confident, but of course it is the decision of the U.S. Congress.”

President George W. Bush and Senate leaders yesterday vowed to revive a plan aimed at buying distressed assets from banks that was rejected by Congress a day earlier. The vote roiled markets already struggling to cope with the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. European governments have helped rescue at least five banks since Sept. 28, with Trichet taking part in talks to save Belgium’s Fortis over the weekend.

Trichet said a pan-European approach to the banking crisis was unlikely, saying “we are not a fully-fledged federation with a federal budget.”

“Each country has to mobilize its own efforts,” said Trichet. “But of course there is a European spirit and that is the spirit of the single market.”

Trichet declined to answer questions about ECB monetary policy before tomorrow’s interest-rate decision. All 58 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News expect the central bank to
keep its benchmark rate at 4.25 percent.

European leaders are trying to better coordinate their response to the financial crisis. Luxembourg Finance Minister Jean-Claude Juncker said yesterday he expects to meet with Trichet and French President Nicolas Sarkozy on Oct. 4 to discuss “a more systematic approach.”

Trichet’s ECB has so far chosen not to follow the Federal Reserve in slashing interest rates since credit markets seized up 13 months ago, injecting cash into their markets instead, while keeping monetary policy focused on inflation.

Price Stability
“What’s needed is for us to continue to tell our fellow citizens that we will ensure price stability,” Trichet said in an interview broadcast yesterday on the France 2 television channel.

Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg on Sept. 28 agreed to inject 11.2 billion euros ($16 billion) into Fortis, the largest Belgian financial-services company.

Governments and other authorities have also taken steps to protect the U.K.’s Bradford & Bingley Plc, Brussels and Paris-based Dexia SA, Iceland’s Glitnir Bank hf and Germany’s Hypo Real Estate Holding AG. Ireland yesterday guaranteed the deposits and borrowings of six lenders.


[top]

Can the euro payments system last the week?


[Skip to the end]

Euro equities and banks are now under attack, and the ECB is effectively borrowing hundreds of billions USD from the Fed via swap lines. The eurozone deposit insurance is by the national governments, not the ECN, which are credit constrained.

National government euro bonds have been supported by various CB/monetary authority allocations that are slowing with slowing net exports.

A major bank failure becomes infinitely more problematic in the eurozone than in the US, Japan, or UK, all who have deposit insurance at the ‘federal’ level.

The risk in the eurozone is the payments system completely shuts down, and re opens only when the ECB is allowed to conduct what amounts to fiscal transfers.

In a crunch, USD borrowings will need to be serviced from selling euros to buy USD and result in a sharply falling euro.

Yields on the national government bonds will move sharply higher due to credit concerns, as will credit default premiums in general.

For 10 years the euro ‘system’ has functioned reasonably well on the way up.

The systemic risk is only on the way down. And once in motion, it will unwind very quickly.

Protect yourself by not having any euro deposits, buying out of the money puts on the national government bonds and out of the money puts on the euro.

And then hope you lose those bets!


[top]

Bloomberg: China Halts Interbank Lending With US, China Morning Post…


[Skip to the end]

This may actually help bring LIBOR down as the US banks don’t need USD funds from China while the rest of the world does.

China Halts Interbank Lending With U.S., Morning Post Says

By Joost Akkermans

Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) China’s banking regulator told domestic banks to halt lending to U.S. financial institutions in the interbank market to help prevent possible losses, the South China Morning Post reported, citing people it didn’t identify.

The ban imposed by the China Banking Regulatory Commission is for interbank lending of all currencies to U.S. banks, though not to banks from other countries, the English-language Hong Kong newspaper said today.

The decree came after the regulator obtained data about the risk of local banks to bonds issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., according to the newspaper. The CBRC wasn’t available for comment yesterday, the Morning Post reported.


[top]

Fed increasing $ vs fx swap lines to ECB and others


[Skip to the end]

This is an extension of credit to those CBs which functionally allows them to borrow (and thereby also get ‘short’) USD, presumably to fund their local USD needs for their institutions short USD, and presumably to cover losses on their USD financial assets and to finance the remaining balances.

The ECB has no USD to fund its member banks, and is not inclined to sell euros and buy USD as, at a minimum, a matter of ideology.

This is not a good sign for the eurozone banking system solvency, though the size is modest, at least for now.


[top]