Atlanta Fed, Producer prices, Consumer Sentiment

First, the economic releases have continued to lower the Atlanta Fed’s Q1 GDP estimate now down to only .6%:

My narrative seems to be holding- the drop in oil prices has lowered total spending below ‘stall speed’, after energy related spending chasing $90 oil was what kept it positive for the last couple of years:
atl-nowcast
Prices down and it’s not just energy:

PPI-FD
ppi-feb
Highlights
The PPI for total final demand fell 0.5 percent in February after decreasing 0.8 percent in January. Expectations were for a 0.3 percent rebound. Energy was flat, following a 10.3 percent drop while foods decreased 1.6 percent, following a 1.1 percent dip in January. Excluding food and energy, producer price inflation posted a minus monthly 0.5 percent after slipping 0.1 percent the month before. Analysts called for a 0.1 percent gain. Total excluding food, energy and trade services were unchanged after dipping 0.3 percent in January. Expectations were for a 0.1 percent rise in February.

The index for final demand goods decreased 0.4 percent after falling 2.1 percent in January. Leading the decrease, margins for final demand trade services dropped 1.5 percent. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)
The index for final demand services fell 0.5 percent after easing 0.2 percent the month before.

On a seasonally adjusted year-ago basis, PPI final demand was down 0.7 percent, compared to down 0.1 percent in January. Excluding food & energy, the PPI final demand was up 1.0 percent versus 1.7 percent the month before. Excluding food, energy, and trade services PPI inflation slowed to 0.7 percent on a year-ago basis, compared to 0.9 percent in January.

Consumer Sentiment
cs-mar
Highlights
There appears to have been a bubble in consumer spirits late into last year and early into this one, that is a brief surge that came and went and never materialized into a rise for consumer spending. The first read on consumer sentiment this month fell very sharply to 91.2, down 4.2 points from final February for the lowest reading since November. Sentiment peaked at 98.2 in mid-month January which was the highest reading in 8 years.

The two components of the headline index both show weakness, at 103.0 for a 3.9 point decline for current conditions and at 83.7 for a 4.3 point decline for expectations. The decline in current conditions points to weakness for consumer spending this month relative to February while the decline in expectations points to a falling off in confidence for the jobs outlook.

Gasoline prices, though low, have been edging up in recent weeks and are now lifting inflation expectations which are up 2 tenths for the 1-year outlook to 3.0 percent and up 1 tenth for the 5-year outlook to 2.8 percent.
cs-march-graph

JPM, MS Q1 revision, Fed labor market conditions index, German exports fall, Japan GDP

From JPM:

In light of the data we’ve received this week – January reports for real consumer spending, construction spending, and net exports that varied from disappointing to downright weak, as well as a softer February print for car sales –– we are marking down our tracking for annualized real GDP growth in Q1 from 2.5% to 2.0%. Even after this revision risks are more skewed to the downside than upside. By way of comparison, the Atlanta Fed’s tracking estimate of Q1 recently came down to 1.2%.

From MS:

weaker-q1

Labor Market Conditions Index
lmci-feb
Highlights
The Fed’s Labor Market Conditions Index remained positive in February but decelerated to 4 in February from 4.8 in January. This was despite stronger-than expected payroll gains this past Friday. One area of weakness likely was soft wage growth. The Fed’s Research Department does not give details on this unofficial report. While the employment situation’s payroll numbers have some analysts suggesting a June rate hike by the Fed, today’s LMCI indicates that there may be considerable debate within the Fed on “liftoff” timing-especially since inflation is very sluggish.

German exports post biggest drop in five months in January

Mar 9 (Reuters) — Seasonally-adjusted exports decreased by 2.1 percent in January after a sharp rise in December. The data for December was revised down to a 2.8 percent gain from a previously reported 3.4 percent increase. An unadjusted breakdown showed shipments to the euro zone dropped by 2.8 percent in January compared with a year ago while Germany sent 0.5 percent fewer goods to countries outside of the European Union. Exports to countries within the EU that do not use the euro were the only ones to post a gain.

Japan’s 4th-qtr GDP downgraded as business investment falls

Mar 9 (Kyodo) — Gross domestic product for October-December grew an annualized real 1.5 percent, downgraded from 2.2 percent. The figure translated into a 0.4 percent increase from the previous quarter, against 0.6 percent growth in a preliminary report released Feb. 16 by the Cabinet Office. Business investment dropped 0.1 percent, against an earlier-reported 0.1 percent growth, for the third straight quarter of decline. Private consumption was upgraded to a 0.5 percent rise from a 0.3 percent increase. Exports grew 2.8 percent, revised upward from a 2.7 percent increase.

Wells capping sub prime autos, bank margins and income, personal income and spending, ISM manufacturing, construction spending

Wells pulling back some on sub prime auto loans:

Wells Fargo Puts a Ceiling on Subprime Auto Loans

And banks in general fighting this:

net-income-margin-1

net-income-margin-2

A bit worse than expected. Fewer dollars spent, but more ‘real things’ purchased due to lower prices, but any calculation of a deflator with the large drop in oil prices is problematic:

Personal Income and Outlays
personal-income-table-jan
Highlights
In January, personal income was moderately healthy as was spending after price effects are discounted. Personal income posted a gain of 0.3 percent after growing 0.3 percent in December. January fell short of analysts’ forecast for a 0.4 percent boost. The wages & salaries component jumped 0.6 percent, following a rise of 0.1 percent the prior month.

Personal spending decreased 0.2 percent, following a decline of 0.3 percent in December. Durables slipped 0.1 percent, following a 1.4 percent drop in December-due to sluggish auto sales. Nondurables plunged 2.2 percent in January after decreasing 1.4 percent the month before—with lower gasoline prices pulling this component down. Services advanced 0.5 percent after a 0.2 percent gain in December.

But weakness in current dollar spending was price related as chain-weighted (price adjusted) personal spending came in at 0.3 percent, following a 0.1 percent dip in December. January actually is a good start for first quarter GDP in the PCE component.

Prices at the headline level fell again, down 0.5 percent in January after a 0.2 percent dip the month before. The core PCE price index firmed to up 0.1 percent from flat in December. On a year-ago basis, headline inflation eased to 0.2 percent from 0.8 percent in December. The year-ago core rate was steady at 1.3 percent.

Income growth was moderately healthy in January. The consumer sector has fuel for spending-especially in the important wages & salaries component. Inflation is low and well below the Fed’s target of 2 percent year-ago inflation, meaning the Fed likely will stick with no rate hike before June.

pce-jan

From the GDP report, through Q4:

rpce-jan
The monthly number shows January 2015 did better than January 2014 when the winter was particularly cold:
rpce-jan-2
ism-feb

Construction Spending
construction-spending-jan-table
construction-spending-jan

Existing home sales, Dallas Fed manufacturing, Chicago Fed

Again, with mtg purchase apps down and cash sales down why expect this to go up?

And with the oil credit expansion over it could get worse.

Existing Home Sales
existing-home-sales-jan-table
Highlights
Despite a strong jobs market and low mortgage rates, demand for housing, whether for existing or new homes, remains flat. Sales of existing homes in January fell a very steep 4.9 percent to an annual rate of 4.82 million which is the lowest rate since April last year. All regions show single-digit declines with the West the deepest, at minus 7.1 percent. Declines hit both single-family homes, at minus 5.1 percent, and condos, at minus 3.5 percent.

Price concessions didn’t help the month’s sales with the median down 4.1 percent to $199,600. This is the first reading below $200,000 since March last year. The drop in sales made for a sizable rise in inventory relative to sales, to 4.7 months vs December’s 4.4 months.

The lack of sales punch has the National Association of Realtors wondering. The NAR says it’s “puzzled” that homeowners are now staying in their homes 10 years on average vs the long term average of 7 years, saying that homeowners may be happy with their mortgage rates and are perhaps doubtful that housing will rebound.
existing-home-sales-jan
existing-home-sales-jan-2
Dallas Fed Mfg Survey
dallas-fed-feb-table
Highlights
The latest regional Fed survey on manufacturing points to weakness in the manufacturing sector in February.

Texas factory activity posted a second month of no growth in February, according to business executives responding to the Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey. The production index, a key measure of state manufacturing conditions, remained near zero (0.7) and indicated output was essentially unchanged from January levels.

Other measures of current manufacturing activity reflected contraction in February. The new orders index pushed further into negative territory, coming in at minus 12.2, its lowest reading since June 2009. The shipments index fell to minus 3.3, also reaching a low not seen since 2009. The capacity utilization index turned negative as well, dropping from 5.1 to minus 4.9.

Perceptions of broader business conditions remained rather pessimistic this month. The general business activity index moved further negative to minus 11.2, posting its lowest reading in nearly two years. The company outlook index remained slightly negative and edged down from -3.8 to -4.4.

Labor market indicators reflected only minor employment growth and slightly shorter workweeks. The February employment index moved down from 9 to 1.3. Fifteen percent of firms reported net hiring, compared with 14 percent reporting net layoffs. The hours worked index edged further into negative territory, coming in at minus1.6.

Prices fell slightly in February and upward pressure on wages continued to ease. The raw materials prices index held steady at minus1.7, indicating marginal downward pressure on input costs. The finished goods prices index was also slightly negative but edged up from minus 6.7 to minus 4.4. Manufacturers are no longer expecting sizeable price increases six months ahead, as the indexes of future prices were in single digits this month, down markedly from 2014 readings. The wages and benefits index edged down for a second month in a row and came in at 16.8.

Expectations regarding future business conditions rebounded somewhat in February. The index of future general business activity shot up 12 points to 5.5 after posting a negative reading in January. The index of future company outlook rose nearly 10 points to 11.8, although it remains well below the index level seen throughout 2014. Indexes for future manufacturing activity showed mixed movements in February but remained in solidly positive territory.

The latest Dallas Fed report plays into the hands of the doves on the FOMC. Manufacturing activity is weak and inflation pressures are non-existent currently. It will be interesting to hear Dallas Fed president Richard Fisher’s comments in speech since he has been hawkish. Fed chair Janet Yellen will be speaking to Congress this Tuesday and Wednesday and likely will comment on sector strengths and weakness and on price pressures.
dallas-fed-feb

Chicago Fed National Activity Index

chicago-fed-feb-table
Highlights
January was a good month for the economy based on the national activity index which jumped back into the plus column, to 0.13 from December’s revised minus 0.7. The 3-month average is very strong, little changed at plus 0.33.

The big swing factor for January is production-related indicators which rose to plus 0.02 from December’s minus 0.22 in a gain driven by a swing higher for industrial production. The negative reading from consumption & housing improved to minus 0.10 from minus 0.13 while the contribution from sales/orders/inventories held unchanged at plus 0.03. Employment remains a big plus but, due to a tick higher for the unemployment rate to 5.7 percent, a little less so, at plus 0.18 from plus 0.28.
chicago-fed-feb

Japan trade surplus, US household loan growth, Jobless claims

More US consumption of imports indicated here as well as with US trade data, as US growth continues to get downgraded post oil price collapse:

Japan’s annual exports jump most since late 2013 in boost to economy

Feb 18 (Reuters) — Japan’s annual exports in January jumped the most since late 2013. The 17.0 percent year-on-year gain in exports marked the fifth straight month of increase, supported by brisk shipments of cars to the United States and of electronics parts to Asia. The export data followed a 12.8 percent rise in December.

As the US demand leakages (agents spending less than their incomes) grow relentlessly, I look for the deficit spending required to sustain GDP growth. Turns out last year it came from the energy sector which ended abruptly in Q4 2014, with GDP growth sagging accordingly. And so far no sign of a credit expansion from the household sector. You can argue debt is more affordable, but not that it’s happening:

loan-1

loan-2

loan-3

loan-4

loan-5

Philly Fed index falls to lowest in a year

philly-fed-feb

philly-fed-feb-graph

mtg prch apps, housing starts, Producer prices, Redbook retail sales

More bad housing news:

MBA Purchase Applications
mba-2-13
Highlights
The purchase index is down for a 5th straight week, 7.0 percent lower for the 2nd consecutive week. Rates have been rising in recent weeks including the latest week which is especially depressing refinancing activity where the index fell a very sharp 16.0 percent following the prior week’s 10 percent fall. The report notes that demand for larger refinancing loans is especially down.

The average mortgage for conforming loans ($417,000 or less) rose 9 basis points in the week to 3.93 percent. The decline in the purchase index is a negative signal for underlying home sales.

More bad housing news:

Housing Starts
housing-starts-jan
Highlights
Housing is not adding to economic momentum. Housing starts slipped in January on weakness in single-family starts. Housing starts declined 2.0 percent in January after a 7.1 percent jump the month before. The 1.065 million unit pace was up 18.7 percent on a year-ago basis. Expectations were for a 1.070 million pace for January.

Single-family permits dropped 6.7 percent after a 7.9 percent boost in December. Multifamily starts gained 7.5 percent, following a 5.6 percent rise in December.

Again, permits suggest that housing activity is muted. Housing permits dipped 0.7 percent, following no change in December. The 1.053 million unit pace was up 8.1 percent on a year-ago basis. The market consensus was for a 1.070 million unit pace.

The bottom line is that housing is not adding to economic activity. This means the Fed likely will continue to reinvest mortgage-backed securities to keep rates low. But the long-term trend appears to be that single-family housing is not viewed as strong an investment as in the past.
housing-starts-jan-graph

housing-starts-jan-graph-2

PPI-FD
ppi-jan
Highlights
The PPI for total final demand decreased 0.8 percent after falling 0.2 percent in December. The consensus forecast a 0.5 percent drop. A sharp drop in energy pulled the headline number down. Excluding food and energy, producer price inflation slipped 0.1 percent after firming 0.3 percent the month before. Expectations were for a 0.1 percent rise.

The index for final demand goods fell 2.1 percent after dropping 1.1 percent in December. The January decrease was led by prices for final demand energy, which fell a monthly 10.3 percent. The decline in prices for final demand goods was led by the index for gasoline, which dropped 24.0 percent. Prices for diesel fuel, jet fuel, basic organic chemicals, dairy products, and home heating oil also moved lower. Conversely, the index for residential electric power moved up 1.2 percent. Prices for pharmaceutical preparations and for fresh and dry vegetables also advanced. Prices for final demand foods decreased 1.1 percent after slipping 0.1 percent in December.

The index for final demand services eased 0.2 percent after advancing 0.3 percent in December. In January, prices for final demand services less trade declined 0.3 percent after rising 0.1 percent the month before. This was the first decline since falling 0.3 percent in September 2014. In January, a major contributor to the decline in the index for final demand services was prices for outpatient care (partial), which fell 0.7 percent.

On a seasonally adjusted year-ago basis, PPI final demand was down 0.1 percent, compared to up 1.0 percent in December. Excluding food & energy, PPI final demand was up 1.5 percent versus 1.8 percent the month before.

Overall, inflation at the manufacturers’ level is muted even after discounting energy declines. The Fed is likely to see the numbers as allowing delayed rate increases.
redbook-2-15

And yet another disappointing report:

Industrial Production
ip-jan

Highlights
The industrial sector turned modestly positive in January-including for the manufacturing component. Industrial production for January rebounded 0.2 percent after a December decrease of 0.3 percent. Market expectations were for a 0.4 percent boost for January.

Manufacturing rose 0.2 percent in January after no change the month before. But the negative is that December manufacturing was revised down from a 0.3 percent gain. The manufacturing increase fell short of the 0.4 percent market forecast.

Manufacturing output rose 0.2 percent in January, as the production of durable goods advanced 0.4 percent and the production of nondurable goods was unchanged. Gains were posted by all major durable goods industries except motor vehicles and parts, aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment, and furniture and related products. Increases of more than 1.0 percent were recorded in the production of primary metals and of computer and electronic products. Among the major nondurable goods industries, gains in the indexes for apparel and leather, for chemicals, and for plastics and rubber products offset losses elsewhere. The production of other manufacturing industries (publishing and logging) moved down 0.4 percent.

Mining dropped 1.0 percent in January after a 2.1 percent jump the prior month. Utilities made a partial rebound of 2.3 percent after plunging 6.9 percent in December.

Overall capacity utilization was unchanged at 79.4 percent.

The biggest news from this report was the downward revision to December. Manufacturing is still sluggish although on a barely positive uptrend.

Consumer comfort, business inventories

Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index
inventories-dec
Highlights
According to Bloomberg, consumer confidence declined for a second straight week, interrupting a four-month surge as Americans’ perceptions of their finances and the economy waned.

Business Inventories
bberg-consumer-comfort
Highlights
A mismatch between inventories and sales is appearing in what could be a negative for production and employment. Business inventories rose only 0.1 percent in December but business sales fell a very sharp 0.9 percent for a 3rd straight decline. The inventory-to-sales ratio jumped 2 notches to 1.33 which is the heaviest reading since July 2009.

All 3 components show builds relative to sales especially retailers where inventories of apparel and building materials look heavy. Inventories of autos also look heavy — especially given this morning’s contraction in the auto component of the January retail sales report.

my comments on comments on the CBO report

STAFF ANALYSIS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE’S BUDGET AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK, 2015–2025 “Political differences shouldn’t prevent us from taking bold, decisive action to address America’s dire financial outlook.

Yes, there is an acute shortage of available desired savings as indicated by the slack in the labor market.

Republicans and Democrats agree that being $18 trillion in debt today and facing the prospect of spending more than $800 billion a year on interest payments alone does not lend itself to a prosperous future for our country.

We don’t agree. A prosperous future is not a function of said forecast interest payments.

CBO’s numbers only reinforce this notion.

To the contrary, the inflation forecast and growth forecast together indicate the deficit forecast is far too low-given current institutional structure- to accommodate the nations savings desires, and as a consequence aggregate demand falls short of full employment levels.

The longer we postpone reforms and put off making tough decisions, the deeper the hole we have to climb out of. Let’s not miss the opportunity before us to start down a new path and address our problems head on.”

I agree, the problem of inadequate aggregate demand should be addressed head on, immediately, and decisively with an immediate fiscal expansion- tax cuts and/or spending increases. There is no time to waste as we are sacrificing yet another generation of young Americans on the alter of failed austerity.

– Chairman Mike Enzi “America remains on a financially unsustainable path that threatens the future stability, security, and prosperity of our economy.

The idea of financial sustainability with a non convertible currency, floating exchange rate policy is entirely inapplicable.
What is threatening the future is a deficit that’s far too small to accommodate our savings desires, as evidenced by the low inflation forecast and the low participation rates.

Interest on the debt alone will consume $5.6 trillion of federal spending over the next decade.

This interest is paid routinely by the Fed by simply crediting the appropriate member bank’s reserve account at the Fed.
There are no grandchildren or taxpayers in sight when this routine accounting entry take place.

We have a duty to prevent a clear and present danger, and that means we must take steps now to balance the budget.” – Sen. Jeff Sessions “The new projections released by the CBO should serve as a stark reminder that our country is on an unsustainable economic path. The longer we wait to act, the more difficult it will become to put in place real reforms to control spending and reduce our over $18 trillion national debt.

It is a fact, not theory, that those $18 trillion of net financial assets held by the global economy as ‘savings’ is far less than the desired net savings as evidenced by the unemployment rates and labor participation rates, and an immediate fiscal expansion- lower taxes and/or higher spending- is in order.

This dangerous level of debt remains a drag on the economy and job growth and will only worsen over time if Washington continues to irresponsibly add to the credit card.” – Sen. Mike Crapo “This latest CBO report indicates that we’re headed down an unsustainable path that will put a damper on economic growth and hurt American workers.

Nothing could be further from the truth. When govt cuts taxes and/or increases spending every professional economic forecaster paid to be right increases his GDP estimate and lowers his unemployment forecast.

When a nonpartisan organization like the CBO says that Americans will pay more taxes yet our deficits will rise, something needs to be done.

Yes, we need an immediate tax cut and/or spending increase.

It’s crucial that we get our spending and deficits under control so we can grow our economy and give job creators the certainty they need to expand and hire more workers.” – Sen. Rob Portman “With $18 trillion in debt and the growth of entitlement programs skyrocketing, it is clear the federal government’s current fiscal path is unsustainable. A sluggish economy makes the problem even worse. CBO has warned that this situation could persist if no action is taken.

True! Without an immediate tax cut and/or spending increase the economy will continue to under employ and under pay the American people.

Controlling debt requires making smart choices on spending as well as enacting policies that encourage stronger economic growth.” – Sen. Roger Wicker “I didn’t come to Washington to sit idly by as lawmakers in both parties pretend the deficit is shrinking and that our national debt is not a concern.

True, he came to Washington with no clue as to the functioning of today’s monetary system.

We have a genuine fiscal crisis on our hands. We’re already handing our kids and grandkids a national debt of over $18 trillion and tens of trillions of dollars of unfunded liabilities for entitlement programs. The latest CBO report shows that the deck is stacked to get even worse.

No, in fact their 2% long term inflation forecast is evidence that the built in spending is insufficient to keep the US running at anywhere near full capacity.

We need a sense of urgency to seriously tackle our national debt because of the threat it poses to our economy and national security. As a member of the Budget Committee, I look forward to working with Senate Budget Chairman Mike Enzi and House Budget Chairman Tom Price in the pursuit of a budget that reflects the tough decisions necessary to eliminate wasteful spending, prioritize our resources, and grow the economy.” – Sen. David PerdueSummary CBO projects that the government will collect $3.2 trillion in revenue and spend $3.7 trillion this year, resulting in a deficit of $468 billion in FY 2015 ($15 billion less than recorded in the prior year). Based on current law, CBO projects that the country’s fiscal situation will remain relatively stable for the next few years. After FY 2019, however, CBO projects steadily increasing levels of deficits, debt, and interest payments. By the last year of the budget window, FY 2025, deficits will again surpass the $1 trillion mark, debt held by the public will reach $21.6 trillion, and a single year’s interest payments will total $827 billion.

And the inflation and employment forecasts show that isn’t nearly enough to be adding to savings to support our economy at full employment levels.

According to CBO, federal outlays will total $3.7 trillion in FY 2015, or 20.3 percent of GDP— slightly higher than the 20.1 percent 50-year historical average. Federal outlays are expected to grow to reach $6.1 trillion, or 22.3 percent of GDP by FY 2025, while revenues are expected to remain steady at about 18 percent of GDP. Spending is projected to increase by 2 percentage points of GDP over the budget window. Mandatory spending (primarily Social Security and health care spending) will account for 1.7 percentage points of the increase; net interest costs will contribute another 1.7 percentage points; and discretionary spending will account for a reduction of 1.4 percentage points. CBO projects federal revenues will total $3.2 trillion in FY 2015, or 17.7 percent of GDP—slightly above the 50-year historical average of 17.4 percent. Under current law, total revenues will rise significantly in 2016 to $3.5 billion (18.4 percent of GDP) due mainly to the expiration of business tax provisions that were allowed to lapse at the end of calendar year 2014. After FY 2016, revenue collections will remain steady at approximately 18.1 percent of GDP throughout the duration of the forecast period. In total, over the 10-year budget horizon (FY 2016–2025), CBO expects the federal government will collect $41.7 trillion in revenue. Deficits Over the period FY 2016–2025, annual spending will outpace tax collections by a cumulative total of $7.6 trillion.For the budget year (FY 2016), CBO projects a deficit of $467 billion. Spending will total $3.9 trillion, while revenues total $3.5 trillion. Deficits will begin to climb after FY 2016, reaching $1.1 trillion by FY 2025. Deficits will remain relatively flat at around 2.5 percent of GDP from FY 2015 through FY 2018 (slightly below the 50-year average of 2.7 percent of GDP), then rise steadily to 4 percent of GDP by FY 2025. Debt And Interest CBO projects that debt held by the public will follow a similar path as deficits, remaining relatively stable at about 74 percent of GDP in the near term and then rapidly growing to nearly 79 percent of GDP by FY 2025. In dollar terms, debt held by the public would increase from $13.4 trillion in FY 2015 to $21.6 trillion in FY 2025, a nearly 62 percent increase. CBO notes that while the federal debt increase over the projected window seems modest, it is already high by historical standards—with debt remaining greater relative to GDP than at any other time since the years immediately following World War II.Gross debt, which includes Treasury securities held by federal trust funds, will also continue to rise according to CBO. By the end of FY 2015, CBO projects a gross debt of $18.5 trillion. This number will grow to $27.3 trillion by the end of FY 2025, an increase of 47.7 percent. Gross debt grows less rapidly than public debt because Social Security begins redeeming bonds at a rapid rate toward the end of the projection period.

Yes, and the 2% inflation forecast indicates all of this fall short of providing the savings needed for our economy to sustain full employment.

According to CBO, carrying these high levels of debt has negative consequences for the federal budget and the U.S. economy, including increased government borrowing crowding out private borrowing and leading to increased costs of borrowing for businesses,

That applies only to fixed exchange rate regimes. It is entirely inapplicable to the US with our floating exchange rate policy, as history has clearly demonstrated.

limits to the ability of the government to respond to crises with tax and spending policies,

Any such limit is by political decision, and not an operational constraint with todays floating exchange rate policy.

and increased interest payments.

Yes, which are simply a credit to a member bank account by the Fed.

The federal government is expected to spend $227 billion on interest payments in FY 2015, or about 1.3 percent of GDP. These interest payments will increase to $827 billion (3 percent of GDP) by FY 2025, an increase of 264 percent. These interest costs, a product of continuing to carry such a high debt burden, will put a strain on federal resources and begin to crowd out other priorities.

Interest payments are a matter of the Fed crediting a member bank account. The notion of a strain on federal resources’ is entirely inapplicable. And, in fact, even with those interest payments inflation is forecast at only 2% indicating there is no forecast of excess spending per se.

Enough???