Tag Archives: Inflation

Comments on Brian Wesbury article

Posted on by

He’s got the data right, and I agree with all he concludes from it. All he’s missing is the difference he points two between now (unlimited funds available) and The Great Depression (banks short of lendable funds), including what the Fed presumably ‘did’ each time, are the differences between the constraints of the gold standard of that time vs today’s floating fx policy.

The Economy Is Fine (Really)

by Brian Wesbury

It is hard to imagine any time in history when such rampant pessimism about the economy has existed with so little evidence of serious trouble.

True, retail sales fell 0.4% in December and fourth-quarter real GDP probably grew at only a 1.5% annual rate. It is also true that in the past six months manufacturing production has been flat, new orders for durable goods have fallen at a 0.8% annual rate, and unemployment blipped up to 5%. Soft data for sure, but nowhere near the end of the world.

It is most likely that this recent weakness is a payback for previous strength. Real GDP surged at a 4.9% annual rate in the third quarter, while retail sales jumped 1.1% in November. A one-month drop in retail sales is not unusual. In each of the past five years, retail sales have reported at least three negative months. These declines are part of the normal volatility of the data, caused by wild swings in oil prices, seasonal adjustments, or weather. Over-reacting is a mistake.

A year ago, most economic data looked much worse than they do today. Industrial production fell 1.1% during the six months ending February 2007, while new orders for durable goods fell 3.9% at an annual rate during the six months ending in November 2006. Real GDP grew just 0.6% in the first quarter of 2007 and retail sales fell in January and again in April. But the economy came back and roared in the middle of the year — real GDP expanded 4.4% at an annual rate between April and September.

With housing so weak, the recent softness in production and durable goods orders is understandable. But housing is now a small share of GDP (4.5%). And it has fallen so much already that it is highly unlikely to drive the economy into recession all by itself. Exports are 12% of the economy, and are growing at a 13.6% rate. The boom in exports is overwhelming the loss from housing.

Personal income is up 6.1% during the year ending in November, while small-business income accelerated in October and November, during the height of the credit crisis. In fact, after subtracting income taxes, rent, mortgages, car leases and loans, debt service on credit cards and property taxes, incomes rose 3.9% faster than inflation in the year through September. Commercial paper issuance is rising again, as are mortgage applications.

Some large companies outside of finance and home building are reporting lower profits, but the over-reaction to very spotty negative news is astounding. For example, Intel’s earnings disappointed, creating a great deal of fear about technology. Lost in the pessimism is the fact that 20 out of 24 S&P 500 technology companies that have reported earnings so far have beaten Wall Street estimates.

Models based on recent monetary and tax policy suggest real GDP will grow at a 3% to 3.5% rate in 2008, while the probability of recession this year is 10%. This was true before recent rate cuts and stimulus packages. Now that the Fed has cut interest rates by 175 basis points, the odds of a huge surge in growth later in 2008 have grown. The biggest threat to the economy is still inflation, not recession.

Yet many believe that a recession has already begun because credit markets have seized up. This pessimistic view argues that losses from the subprime arena are the tip of the iceberg. An economic downturn, combined with a weakened financial system, will result in a perfect storm for the multi-trillion dollar derivatives market. It is feared that cascading problems with inter-connected counterparty risk, swaps and excessive leverage will cause the entire “house of cards,” otherwise known as the U.S. financial system, to collapse. At a minimum, they fear credit will contract, causing a major economic slowdown.

For many, this catastrophic outlook brings back memories of the Great Depression, when bank failures begot more bank failures, money was scarce, credit was impossible to obtain, and economic problems spread like wildfire.

This outlook is both perplexing and worrisome. Perplexing, because it is hard to see how a campfire of a problem can spread to burn down the entire forest. What Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke recently estimated as a $100 billion loss on subprime loans would represent only 0.1% of the $100 trillion in combined assets of all U.S. households and U.S. non-farm, non-financial corporations. Even if losses ballooned to $300 billion, it would represent less than 0.3% of total U.S. assets.

Beneath every dollar of counterparty risk, and every swap, derivative, or leveraged loan, is a real economic asset. The only way credit troubles could spread to take down the entire system is if the economy completely fell apart. And that only happens when government policy goes wildly off track.

In the Great Depression, the Federal Reserve allowed the money supply to collapse by 25%, which caused a dangerous deflation. In turn, this deflation caused massive bank failures. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, Herbert Hoover’s tax hike passed in 1932, and then FDR’s alphabet soup of new agencies, regulations and anticapitalist government activity provided the coup de grace. No wonder thousands of banks failed and unemployment ballooned to 20%.

But in the U.S. today, the Federal Reserve is extremely accommodative. Not only is the federal funds rate well below the trend in nominal GDP growth, but real interest rates are low and getting lower. In addition, gold prices have almost quadrupled during the past six years, while the consumer price index rose more than 4% last year.

These monetary conditions are not conducive to a collapse of credit markets and financial institutions. Any financial institution that goes under does so because of its own mistakes, not because money was too tight. Trade protectionism has not become a reality, and while tax hikes have been proposed, Congress has been unable to push one through.

Which brings up an interesting thought: If the U.S. financial system is really as fragile as many people say, why should we go to such lengths to save it? If a $100 billion, or even $300 billion, loss in the subprime loan world can cause the entire system to collapse, maybe we should be working hard to build a better system that is stronger and more reliable.

Pumping massive amounts of liquidity into the economy and pumping up government spending by giving money away through rebates may create more problems than it helps to solve. Kicking the can down the road is not a positive policy.

The irony is almost too much to take. Yesterday everyone was worried about excessive consumer spending, a lack of saving, exploding debt levels, and federal budget deficits. Today, our government is doing just about everything in its power to help consumers borrow more at low rates, while it is running up the budget deficit to get people to spend more. This is the tyranny of the urgent in an election year and it’s the development that investors should really worry about. It reads just like the 1970s.

The good news is that the U.S. financial system is not as fragile as many pundits suggest. Nor is the economy showing anything other than normal signs of stress. Assuming a 1.5% annualized growth rate in the fourth quarter, real GDP will have grown by 2.8% in the year ending in December 2007 and 3.2% in the second half during the height of the so-called credit crunch. Initial unemployment claims, a very consistent canary in the coal mine for recessions, are nowhere near a level of concern.

Because all debt rests on a foundation of real economic activity, and the real economy is still resilient, the current red alert about a crashing house of cards looks like another false alarm. Warren Buffett, Wilbur Ross and Bank of America are buying, and there is
still $1.1 trillion in corporate cash on the books. The bench of potential buyers on the sidelines is deep and strong. Dow 15,000 looks much more likely than Dow 10,000. Keep the faith and stay invested. It’s a wonderful buying opportunity.

Mr. Wesbury is chief economist for First Trust Portfolios, L.P.

♥

Share

Re: exports and the $

Posted on by

On Jan 28, 2008 4:26 PM, Mike wrote:
> bottom line if trade deficit shrinks via export strength that has to be
> extremely dollar bullish-which has all sorts of implications (both of
> you are saying the same thing in that respect)…

sort of. it is shrinking as they are puking $ financial assets to
people who will take them to buy our stuff. so the dollar doesn’t go
up until they use up some of their $ assets and slow down their desire
to get out of them. think of it as an inventory liquidation of $
assets held abroad that drives the dollar down far enough to be able
to sell their $ to someone who wants to buy US goods and services or
US assets.

that’s the exit channel for $ held by non residents. for the US the
process is inflationary and expansionary- good for earnings and gdp.
But the inflation keeps the US domestic real consumption lower than
otherwise.

When the ‘$ inventory liquidation’ by foreigners starts to slow the $
starts to bounce back.

warren

♥

Share

Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz warns of 1930 STYLE LIQUIDITY TRAP

Posted on by

US Slides into Dangerous 1930s ‘Liquidity Trap’

The Daily Telegraph’s Ambrose Evans-Pritchard details interesting insights from Joseph Stiglitz.

No, common errors.

The United States is sliding towards a dangerous 1930s-style “liquidity trap”

Probably not – rare with floating exchange rates.

that cannot easily be stopped by drastic cuts in interest rates, Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz has warned.

That part is true. Interest rates don’t matter much. It was the TAF that narrowed FF/LIBOR, for example, not rate cuts.

“The biggest fear is that long-term bond rates won’t come down in line with short-term rates. We’ll have the reverse of what we’ve seen in recent years, and that is what is frightening the markets,” he told the Daily Telegraph, while trudging through ice and snow in Davos.

Hardly the biggest fear.

Also, note that when the curve went negative, the media flashed recession warnings. When it went positive, they didn’t report the opposite.

“The mechanism of monetary policy is ineffective in these circumstances.

Fed and ECB research shows changes in interest rates don’t do much in any case.

I’m not saying it won’t work at all: it will help the banking system but the credit squeeze is going to go on because nobody trusts anybody else. The Fed is pushing on a string,” he said.

This is very different from the early 1930s.

The grim comments came as markets continued to suffer wild gyrations, reacting to every sign of contagion spreading to Europe, Asia, and emerging markets.

Wall Street has begun to stabilize on talk of a rescue for the embattled bond insurers, MBIA and Ambac.

Another issue that interest rates have nothing to do with.

The Fed’s 75 basis point rate cut allows the banks to replenish their balance sheet by borrowing at short-term rates and lending longer term, playing the credit ‘carry trade’,

Banks are not allowed to take that kind of interest rate risk. The regulators have strict ‘gap’ limits for banks and monitor it on a regular basis.

hence the 9pc rise in the US financials index yesterday. But confidence remains fragile.

I think that was on the monoline rumors as well as prospects for strong earnings. And they were sold down to very low levels previously.

Professor Stiglitz, former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said it takes far too long for monetary policy to work its magic. This will not gain much traction in the midst of a housing crash.

True. Not much is a very strong function of interest rates.

“People have been drawing home equity out of the houses at a rate of $700bn or $800bn a year. It’s been a huge boost to consumption, but that game is now up.

Most studies don’t show much of a wealth effect or ‘cash out’ effect. The Fed has a three cents on the dollar rule of thumb on the way up, maybe less on the way down.

House prices are going to continue falling,

Maybe.

and lower rates won’t stop that this point,” he said.

As above.

“As a Keynesian,

Keynes wrote in the context of the gold standard of the time, though it probably wasn’t his first choice of regimes.

I’d say the biggest back for the buck in terms of immediate stimulus would be unemployment assistance and tax rebates for the poor. That will feed through quickly, but set against the magnitude of the problem, even a fiscal stimulus package of $150bn is not going to be enough,” he said

Enough for what? It’s about 1% of GDP. If exports are strong, GDP may be running at 2% or more without the fiscal package.

And it will add demand when demand is already enough to drive up CPI faster than the Fed likes.

(Way less inflationary and way more beneficial to offer a job at a non disruptive wage to anyone willing and able to work to sustain full employment by ‘hiring off the bottom’ rather than simply adding to demand as planned.)

“The distress is going to be very severe. Around 2m people have lost all their savings,” he did.

How does he know that? Guessing from his projections of home prices?

NASDAQ president Bob Greifeld expressed a rare note of optimism at the World Economic Forum, predicting a swift rally as the double effects of the monetary and fiscal boost lift spirits.

“I think the stimulus package that’s been proposed by the President, to the extent that this is passed in rapid fashion by Congress, has the ability to forestall a recession,” he said.

True, and if there wasn’t going to be a recession, it will magnify the expansion and inflation.

“At the moment, our business is doing better than it ever has because the volumes have been incredibly high. So, it’s been very good for us,” he said.

No recession there.

There were scattered signs of improvement across the world today, with Germany’s IFO confidence index defying expectations with a slight rise in January. Japan’s quarterly export volume held up better than expected.

Recession is currently mostly an expectation, not a current condition.

Even so, the global downturn may already have acquired an unstoppable momentum, requiring months or even years to purge the excesses from the bubble.

Precious few signs of a real economic downturn yet. Just some possible weakening.

Professor Stiglitz blamed the whole US economic establishment for failing to regulate the housing and credit markets adequately, allowing huge imbalances to build up.

Institutional structure provided incentives for lender fraud that resulted in a lot of aggregate demand from high risk borrowers getting credit for a while.

“The Federal Reserve and the Bush Administration didn’t want to hear anything about these problems. The Fed has finally got around to closing the stable door (on subprime lending), but the after the horse has already bolted,” he said.

Whatever that means.

♥

Share

Fed cuts increasing demand and lowering the dollar support crude prices

Posted on by

Oil futures jump back above $90 a barrel

by John Wilen

Oil futures jumped back above $90 a barrel Friday, adding to the previous session’s sharp gains on a view that the recession worries that pulled prices lower in recent weeks may have been overblown.

So markets are now linking rising oil prices to a stronger economy? This is a change in rhetoric from the previous talk that high oil prices were slowing demand, to the current talk that high demand is driving up oil prices.

This would signal to the Fed that markets are saying the economy is now strong enough to cause further inflation.

Energy investors were heartened by recent moves by the Federal Reserve and Congress to shore up the economy, which could prevent oil demand from slowing as much as many had feared.

The Fed doesn’t want this to happen – markets seeing their moves as supportive of higher inflation.

“This week’s emergency interest rate cut by the Fed and the economic stimulus plan proffered by Congress appear to have, for now, stemmed fears of a looming recession in the U.S.,” said Addison Armstrong, director of exchange traded markets at TFS Energy Futures LLC, of Stamford, Conn., in a research note.

Word that Chinese oil demand grew by 6.4 percent in December, the highest rate in months, contributed to oil’s advance.

Concerns that demand from the booming Chinese and Indian economies is outstripping global oil supplies helped push oil to records above $100 earlier this month.

Rising oil prices are also signaling that India and China continue to grow quickly enough to drive up prices.

Light, sweet crude for March delivery rose $1.30 to settle at $90.71 on the New York Mercantile Exchange after rising as high as $91.38. Oil futures last closed above $90 last Friday.

While investors believe the government’s $150 billion stimulus plan and the Fed’s rate cuts will stave off a serious economic slowdown, rate cuts also tend to weaken the dollar, giving investors another reason to buy oil futures. Crude futures offer a hedge against a falling dollar, and oil futures bought and sold in dollars are more attractive to foreign investors when the greenback is falling.

And the Fed’s cuts have weakened the dollar and also contributed to the higher oil prices.

In other words, the article is stating that the rate cuts caused both strong demand and a weak dollar, both driving up inflation.

The financial media is beginning to look past recession fears and to inflation.

Look for article about how the Fed is falling behind the inflation curve.

“When (investors in foreign) countries go to buy oil, they’re buying it on sale,” said James Cordier, president of Liberty Trading Corp., in Tampa, Fla.

Many analysts believe the weakening dollar helped draw speculative investors into oil markets this fall and winter, driving oil prices
above the $100 mark.

Other energy futures also rose Friday. February heating oil futures jumped 4.28 cents to settle at $2.5191 a gallon on the Nymex while February gasoline futures added 3.54 cents to settle at $2.3182 a gallon. Heating oil and gasoline prices were supported by news that Valero Energy Corp.’s 255,000 barrel a day refinery in Aruba was shut down due to a fire.

February natural gas futures rose 18.1 cents to settle at $7.983 per 1,000 cubic feet.

In London, March Brent crude rose $1.83 to settle at $90.90 a barrel Friday on the ICE Futures exchange.

♥

Share

2008-01-25 Balance of Risks Update

Posted on by

Mainstream economics would put it this way:

  • Inflation risk to long term growth vs short term growth risks

So on the inflation side:

  • CPI year over year up to 4.1%
  • Core CPI 2.4% year over year, 2.9% month over month (2.5% high end of Fed’s comfort zone)
  • Headline PCE deflator 3.6% year over year, core PCE 2.2% (1.9% upper band of their target forecast)
  • PPI up 6.3% year over year, core up 2.0% year over year
  • Crude back to $91 after a brief hiatus (‘high eighties’- relax, only attempt at a pun)
  • CRB testing new highs
  • Grains near the highs
  • Import prices up 10.9% year over year, ex petro up 2.9%, reversing years of pre 2003 declines
  • Export prices up 6.0% year over year
  • Prices paid/received remain on the rise in the various surveys
  • $US index reasonably flat, but other currencies experience domestic inflation
  • Not that anyone cares, but gold is at $913
  • 5 year, 5 years forward implied CPI at 2.51%, vs 2.43% at December 18 meeting

And on the growth side:

  • Housing reports remain weak through the winter months – permits still falling
  • November construction spending up 0.1%
  • Mortgage applications moving higher, 4 week moving average down 2.7% year over year, up 8.5% from November 2006 lows
  • November income and spending (1.1%) came out strong, Oct revised up (0.2% to 0.4%), after December 18 meeting
  • November durable goods on the weak side; December out on Tuesday
  • ADP up 40,000, payrolls up 18,000, unemployment up to 5% from 4.7%
  • Initial claims since meeting: 357K, 334K, 322K, 302K, 301K. Possible seasonal issues but no obvious weakness
  • Continuing claims since meeting: 2,754,000; 2,688,000; 2,747,000; 2,672,000. Still a bit higher than before, but not moving up.. yet
  • November trade gap out to 63.1 billion. December numbers released February 14
  • Fiscal balance: Receipts up 5.7%, spending up 8.8% (with labor day distortion) fiscal year over year
  • December vehicle sales 16.3 million, flat since August
  • December retail sales down 0.4%, core up 0.1% month over month, year over year up 3.2%, core up 3.0%
  • December industrial production flat, up 1.5% year over year
  • GDP and ADP at the meeting, payroll forecast up 65,000 on Friday
  • Fed cut 0.75% coincident with the Soc Gen liquidation related equity weakness
  • February Fed Funds futures now at 3.09%, not fully discounting a 50 cut. Got all the way to 3.15 before stocks sold off.

Market functioning:

  • LIBOR vs Fed Funds under control, 3 month LIBOR down 160 bp since December 18 meeting, TAF functioning well
  • Mortgage spreads still historically wide, but trading, and absolute yields also down since Dec 18 meeting
  • Mtg refi’s way up

Fiscal package is on its way!

♥

Share

THE ECB HAS A SINGLE MANDATE, INFLATION, WITH NO INCENTIVE TO DEVIATE

Posted on by

Not to mention my bent is inflation and growth are, at best, very weak functions of interest rates, and they work mostly through the cost side, but that’s another story – see ‘MANDATORY READINGS‘.

ECB’s Weber Says Interest Rates ‘Accommodative’, Dismisses Cut Bets

by John Fraher and Andreas Scholz

(Bloomberg) European Central Bank council member Axel Weber said interest rates in the euro region are still “accommodative” and investors’ expectations of reductions later this year may be “wishful thinking.”

“We have a positive economic outlook and as long as that doesn’t change I would say that rates are still on the accommodative side and in no way restrictive,” Weber said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Davos, Switzerland, at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting.

♥

Share

Re: BTIG Earnings Recap for January 23, 2008

Posted on by

(an email)

On Jan 23, 2008 8:51 PM, Joshua wrote:
>
> Economy is in dire condition?!?!?! Look at today’s earnings reports and
> forecasts…anecdotal, but not so dire at all!

Yes, they’ve been forecasting recession for about a year and it keeps getting put off a quarter.

Now the term is morphing to ‘growth recession’ which mean growth slows for a few quarters.

Hardly the stuff of rate cuts for a mainstream economist when inflation is ripping.

warren

> Subject: BTIG Earnings Recap for January 23, 2008
>
> Stocks staged a late day rally (biggest in 2 months) on a report NY
> regulators met with banks to discuss aid for bond insurers. Trading on
> earnings (6:15pm): COF +0.30 (+0.7%), CTXS -1.02 (-3.2%), EBAY -1.63
> (-6.7%), FFIV +3.91 (+19.4%), GILD -0.81 (-1.8%), ISIL -0.72 (-3.1%) , NFLX
> -0.06 (-0.25%), PLCM +1.72 (+7.7%), QCOM +2.67 (+7.3%), QLGC +0.17 (+1.3%),
> SANM +0.04 (+2.8%), SYMC +1.40 (+9.1%) and WDC +1.36 (+5.5%). Expected to
> report in the morning: ABC, BAX, COL, CY, DHR, ED, F, HSY, KMB, LCC, LMT,
> MHP, NOK, NOC, NUE, POT, RESP, SPWR, T, TXT, UNP and XRX. Economic data for
> tomorrow includes Initial Claims for 1/19, December Existing Home Sales and
> Crude Inventories for 1/19.
>
> TickerAnnouncementNote
> AMCC+ 1c better, revs better
> AVCT+ 10c better, revs inline
> BKHM+ 5c better, revs betterguides Q3 revs inline
> CAVM+ 1c better, revs better
> CBT+ 24c better, revs better
> CHIC+ 1c better, revs inlineguides Q2 EPS inline
> CNS+ 2c better, revs better
> CTXS+ 6c better, revs betterguides Q1 inline, FY08 inline
> GILD+ 1c better, revs inline
> HXL+ 1c better, revs betterguides FY08 inline
> ISIL+ 1c better, revs betterguides Q1 EPS, revs inline
> KNX+ 1c better, revs better
> LSI+ 6c better, revs betterguides Q1 inline
> MOLX+ 2c better, revs betterguides Q3 EPS inline, revs above
> NFLX+ 10c better, revs inlineguides Q1 EPS inline, revs above; FY08 EPS
> above, revs inline
> NVEC+ 6c better, revs better
> PLCM+ 3c better, revs better
> PLXS+ 2c worse, revs inlineguides Q2 EPS above, revs above
> PRXL+ 1c better, revs betterguides Q3 EPS inline, revs above; guides FY08
> EPS, revs above
> QLGC+ 3c better, revs better
> QTM+ inline, revs lower
> RGA+ 6c better, revs lowerguides FY08 EPS above
> RKT+ 4c better, revs better
> RYL+ 53c (ex-items), vs loss of 17c (First Call), revs better
> SANM+ 1c better, revs betterguides Q2 EPS inline, revs above
> SXL+ 10c better, revs better
> SYMC+ 4c better, revs betterguides Q4 EPS above, revs above
> TSS+ 3c better, revs inlineguides FY08 above, revs inline
> VAR+ 3c worse, revs betterissues Q2, FY08 guidance
> VARI+ 2c better, revs better
> WDC+ 31c better, revs better
> EFII= inline, revs inlinereaffirms Q1 guidance
> FFIV= inline, revs inlineannounces share repurchase up to $200mln
> SRDX= inline, revs better
> ACXM- 2c worse, revs lowerissues FY08 guidance
> CBST- 1c worse, revs inline
> CLDN- 1c worse, revs better
> COF- 3c worse, revs lower
> DGII- 3c worse, revs inlinereaffirms FY08 inline
> EBAY- 4c better, revs betterguides Q1 EPS, revs below; FY08 EPS inline, revs
> below
> MRCY- 9c better, revs inlineguides Q3 EPS, revs below, FY08 EPS, revs below
> MTSC- 10c worse, revs betterreaffirms FY08 guidance
> NE- 1c worse, revs inline
> PSSI- 1c worse, revs inlinereaffirms FY08 EPS guidance
> PTV- 2c better, revs betterguides Q1 EPS below, FY08 EPS, revs inline
> QCOM- 1c worse, revs betterguides Q2 EPS, revs inline; reaffirms FY08 EPS,
> guides FY08 revs inline
> RJF- 11c worse, revs lower
> SOV- 4c worse
> SYK- inline, revs betterguides FY08 inline
> WSTL- loss of 4c vs loss of 6c (may not be comp), revs slightly betterguides
> Q4 below
>

♥

Share

The Fed’s next move

Posted on by

If I were a mainstream economist and on the FOMC (I’m not either, they are both), and world equity markets were firm going into the meeting next week with the monoline issue put to bed, I’d opt for no cut.

That would be expected to rally the $, take down gold and most other commodities, and be taken as a strong move to ‘keep expectations well anchored’ before they had a chance to elevate.

Equities might sell off initially, but be encouraged with the knowledge the Fed was keeping inflation under control, and therefore not get involved into a prolonged, rate hiking fight against inflation down the road.

Also, confidence in the economy would be conveyed, as the no cut decision would be taken as a statement from the Fed that the economy didn’t need further rate cuts.

♥

Share

Jan 23 late update

Posted on by

Monoline problem addressed, stocks suddenly oversold as that risk fades.

Most earning look strong. Guidance may be soft but that’s at least partially a function of the expectation of a recession as per the media reporting and will get ignored as those fears continue to fade.

If initial claims tomorrow are around 325,000 as expected, and continuing claims are reasonably stable, it will indicate the labor markets may not have deteriorated from Q4 as feared.

Existing home sales are still winter numbers, but could surprise on the upside as anecdotal reports indicate aggressive selling of excess inventories.

The Fed and the stock market share the same fears. As the market’s fears fade so will the Fed’s, and the markets and the Fed could start to take away a the cut now priced in for the meeting next week.

This leaves FF futures and ED futures maybe 100 bp over priced, as the improving outlook will price in the possibility that fewer future cuts will be appropriate.

And the fiscal package is growing. This is the first time I’ve ever seen the Fed encouraging adding to the deficit, and in an election year it’s hard to imagine Congress and the President not taking advantage of that opening and in the spirit of bipartisan cooperation expanding the package so all get their favorite tax cut and spending initiative. $250-300 billion wouldn’t surprise me. And they need to do it quick before it’s discovered there is no recession problem, but instead an inflation problem.

Also note WTI and Brent crude have converged quite a bit in the sell off, which probably means WTI was sold off by speculators, and a bounce back to the Saudi’s target price (whatever that is) can be expected.

Exports are also likely to be underestimated in next week’s GDP preview, so there’s a good chance it will be revised up when December trade numbers are announced in February.

And without a rise in unemployment and a meaningful drop in personal income housing can come back very quickly from a very low base. Affordability is up nicely, and the production of new homes is down by maybe a million vs last year.

♥

Share