Reuters: Paulson on Mideast USD pegs


[Skip to the end]
Maybe the weak USD is causing him to have second thoughts on preventing CBs and monetary authorities from accumulating USDs to keep their currencies low and support their exporters?

Ending dollar peg won’t solve Gulf inflation: Paulson

by David Lawder

(Reuters) U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said on Saturday the dollar peg for currencies in the Middle East had served those countries well and any changes to the peg would be a sovereign matter.

Paulson, on a visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, also told a news conference the current level of oil prices were a burden on economies and consumers around the world.

Asked about the dollar peg, Paulson said:

“That is a sovereign decision … The dollar peg, I think, has served this country (Saudi Arabia) and this region well.”

Paulson earlier met Saudi Finance Minister Ibrahim al-Assaf to discuss a range of issues including the oil market, the U.S. and Saudi economies and issues related to foreign exchange.


[top]

Reuters: Saudi Arabia Pumps Extra Oil to Match Demand


[Skip to the end]

Saudi Pumps More Oil

(Reuters) Top oil exporter Saudi Arabia has boosted supply to help meet the world’s need for fuel and may further increase output later if needed, a senior Gulf OPEC source said on Wednesday.

Yes, they set price and then sell all that’s demanded at their price. The fact that they are pumping more means demand has increased at current prices.

OPEC’s 13 members, especially core Gulf producers, are taking their output cues from global oil demand rather than sticking to production targets, said the source familiar with Saudi thinking.

“Whenever there is demand it will be met by OPEC,” he said. “The majority of OPEC producers definitely don’t like this high oil price because it is neither in their interest nor in the interest of the global economy, and it’s especially painful for the developing world.”

U.S. crude hit a record above $135 a barrel last week, prompting consumer countries such as the United States to renew their plea for more oil from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

OPEC’s leading producer Saudi Arabia has been adjusting supply to match demand since August last year when prices were around $60 and it was pumping around half a million barrels per day (bpd) less than now.

Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi said earlier this month output would rise by 300,000 bpd and hit 9.45 million bpd in June. Riyadh is pumping about 9.1 million bpd this month, the source said.

Global demand is likely to increase this year by about one million bpd, with demand picking up in the third quarter, the senior Gulf OPEC source said, which explains the current Saudi production increase.

Last September OPEC agreed a 500,000 bpd increase in its formal output targets, with Saudi Arabia providing the greatest share. The group holds its next official conference on Sept. 9 in Vienna.

That’s a long way off.

Most OPEC members would like to see lower prices, but there was little they could do as the market was responding to factors beyond supply and demand, the source said. If those fundamentals dictated the price, oil would cost around $60 to $70 a barrel, the source said.

And the pundits believe this ‘source’.

The world oil market balance is similar to that in 1999, when the price was less than $20, he added.

The oil market has risen in large part because of increasing doubt over production capacity and global oil reserves, the OPEC source said.

That concern was unwarranted, he said, but helped to explain a roughly $5 premium for crude prices for delivery in 2016 compared with the prompt contract now trading at about $126 a barrel.

A wave of investment activity has also been fueled by the weakness of the U.S. currency and lower U.S. interest rates, which adds to the appeal of dollar-denominated commodities.

“This big rush to oil futures is definitely leading to higher and higher prices,” he said. “So adding more or taking less oil from the market will not change the oil price since the sentiment of investors in the futures market is pushing for higher prices.”

Everything but the obvious: Saudis are swing producers, setting price and letting quantity adjust.


[top]

Re: Sauding spending

(an email exchange)

>
>   On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Scott wrote:
>
>   Backed by high oil prices, Saudi Arabia is embarking
>   on a massive spending program focused predominantly
>   on infrastructure projects. The value of announced
>   investment projects so far is $862 billion.
>

Thanks, looks like maybe they’ve figured it out as suspected (jack up price and spend the USD) which improves their real terms of trade while hurting ours and keeps US GDP higher to please policy makers who think it’s all a good thing.

Changing Tides

I’ve been thinking that when the Fed turns its attention to inflation it will find itself way behind that curve, which it is by any mainstream standard, and that the curve then gets negative from a year or two out as markets anticipate rate hikes followed by falling inflation and rate cuts.

Didn’t know exactly how it would get from here to there, how long it would take or exactly when it would happen.

I never thought the Fed would let it go this far. Especially Governor Kohn, who has been through this before in the 1970s with Burns, Miller, and Volcker. This FOMCs inflation tolerance lasted a lot longer than I expected, even with a weak economy and perceived systemic risk.

Won’t be long before the mainstream comes down hard on this FOMC for letting the inflation cat out of the bag with a high risk, untested, counter theory strategy of aggressively cutting into a triple negative supply shock. The mainstream will see it as a ‘hail Mary’ move. If it works, fine, if not it was a foolish error with a major price to pay to fix it.

Maybe they just got what will turn out to be overconfident in their inflation fighting ability. Kind of a ‘we know how to do that and can do it anytime’ attitude.

Wrong. They will soon find out it is not so easy.

Maybe they got confused and saw the tail risk as that of the gold standard era when there were real supply side constraints to money to deal with.

Also, they probably blamed the whole 1970’s thing on labor unions; so, maybe they got blind sided this time because they thought without unions wages would be ‘well contained’ and therefore there would be no inflation.

Wrong on that score as well. It was about oil before, and it is about oil now.

And the fact is, they have no tools for fighting inflation. They think they do (hiking rates), but higher rates just make it worse by raising costs and jacking up rentier incomes. (Incomes of savers who do not work or produce = more demand and no supply)

The inflation broke in the early 80’s only because of a supply response of about 15 million barrels of crude per day that buried OPEC and caused prices to collapse for almost 20 years. (And even during the 20 years of low oil prices and falling imported prices inflation still averaged around 3%.)

That kind of supply response is not going to happen in the near future. I expect the Saudis to keep hiking and inflation to keep getting worse no matter what the Fed does. It is payback time for them from being humiliated in the 1980s, and they are also at ideological war with us whether we know it or not.

Markets might have a false start or two with the interest rate response and flattening curve, just to not make it too easy.

Also, as before, there could be an equity pullback when it is sensed the Fed is going to seriously fight inflation with hikes designed to keep a sufficient output gap to bring inflation increases down.

And along the way everything goes up, including housing prices, during a major cost push inflation. Even with low demand. Just look at all the weak emerging market nations that have had major inflations with weak demand, high rates, etc. etc.

More on ‘now vs the 70’s’

Comments people emailed me and my responses:

Bob Hart wrote:

http://www.wtrg.com/prices.htm

This graph supports your statement below:
Prices fell from a high of maybe $40 per barrel to the $10-15 range for the next two decades

2008-02-21 Crude Oil Production OPEC Countries

Thanks!


“So, there is nothing the US can do to keep core inflation in check? Only the Saudis (and other oil producers) control US inflation?”

In this case, yes. If the Saudis keep hiking cpi goes up and an inflation begins via the various channels that connect energy with other prices. And in this case exacerbated by our pension funds.


Randall Wray wrote:

right: previous high inflations have always been: energy, food, and shelter costs. I haven’t looked at shelter costs this time around.


Haynes wrote:

Great piece. I’ve been thinking along the same lines over the last few weeks. I wish I had been a lot shorter the long end but think that trade still makes sense, especially given future deficits over the next 3-5 years. Having been born in the 1980s and not lived through oil embargos, stock market stagnation and hyper inflation, I am not exactly sure what the play is over the near-term and longer term. If you were to set up a portfolio that couldn’t be changed over the next 3 yrs / 5yrs / 10yrs what do you think the mix should be?

I like AVM’s current mortgage construction: buy FN 5’s versus tailored swap at LIBOR plus 25 basis points with a ‘free’ embedded put. Put it on and sit tight for Fed hikes. Worst case you get LIBOR plus 25.

Call your AVM salesman ASAP before the spread vanishes!!!

Do you buy TIPS / Broad based commodities indices (DJP) / Gold / Stocks / short end / long end?

‘Raw’ TIPS imply a low real rate. If the Fed decides to rais the real rate, you lose.

You could do a 10 year break even bit, especially in Japan, but I like the mortgage trade better.

Think that you could get killed owning bonds but input prices have already run so much its hard to buy commodities in a potentially declining demand environment. Do you buy stocks hoping they simply stay inline with inflation or do you just hold cash?

In the medium- and long-term the S&P will probably more than keep up with inflation, but help to get the right one and to get the right entry point.

Thanks for the help. I know you are busy but any insight would be much appreciated. thanks.


Philip wrote:

I agree entirely with the view that the 1970s was a question of energy prices, a supply-side phenomenon rather than anything else. The implications for policy are important; we might produce a problem where it does not exist if policy is predicated on the wrong interpretation of the problem.

Re: energy and the dollar

(an email)

> On Feb 19, 2008 10:03 AM, Mike wrote:

> Warren, note spec comments and dollar issues, a big hurdle to overcome
> if they go the other way …
> Mike

Hi Mike,

Agreed the dollar may have bottomed. Seems to have reached a level where exports are now growing at about 13% which maybe is the right number to accommodate the pressure from the non resident sector to slow it’s accumulation of $US financial assets.
However I continue to conclude the price of crude is being set by the Saudi’s/Russians acting as swing producer, and that there is sufficient demand to keep them in the driver’s seat. Quantity pumped keeps creeping up at current prices, with Saudis last reporting 9.2 million bpd output.

Crude at 98.70 now. Note crude goes up on news a refinery is down, when refineries are the only buyers of crude, so in fact it’s going up for other reasons (price setting by the swing producer?). Also, WTI is now ahead of Brent, indicating whatever was causing the sag in WTI vs Brent is over. WTI would ordinarily trade higher than Brent due to shipping charges.

Warren

Oil comments

Iraqi Oil Minister Sees No Output Change from OPEC

(Reuters) Iraq’s oil minister Hussain al-Shahristani said on Thursday there was no sign of any shortage of oil in international markets and he did not expect OPEC to change its output levels at a meeting this week.

Saudis might like letting prices sag in front of meetings to stave off production increase talk.

“Quite frankly, the data we are looking at do not show any shortage of oil on the market. The prices are not really affected by any fundamental market forces,”

Right, just the Saudis (and probably Russians as well) setting price and letting the quantity they pump adjust, aka acting as swing producer.

Shahristani said ahead of the meeting on Friday of OPEC oil ministers in Vienna.

Twin themes continue – moderating demand and inflation.

So far, the Fed is directing all its efforts to the demand issue, including support for the coming fiscal package.