MMT to Moody’s- confirm US as AAA on ability to pay

This is an opening for Moody’s to gain a competitive advantage over S&P.

Moody’s can announce that whereas any issuer of it’s own currency can always make nominal payment on a timely basis,
ability to pay is absolute and beyond question for the US government.

Therefore, when reviewing the US government’s credit rating, only willingness to pay is a consideration.

And given the recent Congressional proceedings regarding the debt ceiling,
an entirely self imposed constraint,
Moody’s is putting the US on notice with regard to willingness to pay.

Economy Faces a Jolt as Benefit Checks Run Out

When there is a lack of aggregate demand due to high ‘savings desires’ as the unemployed take jobs when benefits expire, it just means someone else loses a job, and then some, as govt deficit spending falls as well, further reducing aggregate demand. It also serves to drive down wages, as per the latest jobs report.

Economy Faces a Jolt as Benefit Checks Run Out

By Motoko Rich

July 11 (NYT) — An extraordinary amount of personal income is coming directly from the government.

Close to $2 of every $10 that went into Americans’ wallets last year were payments like jobless benefits, food stamps, Social Security and disability, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. In states hit hard by the downturn, like Arizona, Florida, Michigan and Ohio, residents derived even more of their income from the government.

By the end of this year, however, many of those dollars are going to disappear, with the expiration of extended benefits intended to help people cope with the lingering effects of the recession. Moody’s Analytics estimates $37 billion will be drained from the nation’s pocketbooks this year.

In terms of economic impact, that is slightly less than the spending cuts Congress enacted to keep the government financed through September, averting a shutdown.

Unless hiring picks up sharply to compensate, economists fear that the lost income will further crimp consumer spending and act as a drag on a recovery that is still quite fragile. Among the other supports that are slipping away are federal aid to the states, the Federal Reserve’s program to pump money into the economy and the payroll tax cut, scheduled to expire at the end of the year.

“If we don’t get more job growth and gains in wages and salaries, then consumers just aren’t going to have the firepower to spend, and the economy is going to weaken,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, a macroeconomic consulting firm.

Job growth has remained elusive. There are 4.6 unemployed workers for every opening, according to the Labor Department, and Friday’s unemployment report showed that employers added an anemic 18,000 jobs in June.

In Arizona, where there are 10 job seekers for every opening, 45,000 people could lose benefits by the end of the year, according to estimates from the state Department of Economic Security. Yet employers in the state have added just 4,000 jobs over the last 12 months.

Some other states will also feel a disproportionate loss of income unless hiring revives. In Florida, where nearly 476,000 people are collecting unemployment benefits, employers have added only 11,200 jobs in the last year. In Michigan, employers have added about 40,000 jobs since May 2010, but about 267,000 people are claiming jobless benefits.

Throughout the recession and its aftermath, government benefits have helped keep money in people’s wallets and, in turn, circulating among businesses. Total government payments rose to $2.3 trillion in 2010, from $1.7 trillion in 2007, an increase of about 35 percent.

While some of that growth was in Social Security and disability benefits as the population aged, the majority resulted from payments to people continuing to suffer from the recession, said Mr. Zandi. Unemployment benefits, including emergency and extended benefits, are more than three times their prerecession level, he said. The nearly 20 percent of personal income now provided by the government is close to a record high.

Approved by Congress last December, the final extension of jobless benefits — for a maximum of 99 weeks for each unemployed person — is scheduled to conclude at the end of this year. A handful of states, like Wisconsin and Arizona, have already cut off weeks 80 through 99 for their residents. Meanwhile, more of the long-term unemployed are bumping up against the 99-week limit.

Consumers account for an estimated 60 to 70 percent of the country’s economic activity, but two years into the official recovery, businesses are still complaining that people simply are not spending enough.

“Regardless of why people have less money to spend, it affects all retailers in all industries,” said Michael Siemienas, spokesman for SuperValu, which operates grocery chains including Cub Foods, Shop ’n Save and Save-A-Lot. Mr. Siemienas said that the number of SuperValu’s customers using electronic benefit transfers to pay bills had grown over the last year.

Because benefit payments tend to be spent right away to cover basic needs like food and rent, they provide a direct boost to consumer spending. In a study for the Labor Department, Wayne Vroman, an economist at the Urban Institute, estimated that every $1 paid in jobless benefits generated as much as $2 in the economy.

For many of the nearly 7.5 million people collecting unemployment benefits, those payments are keeping them afloat. Laura Metz, 42, was laid off from a clerical job paying $15.30 an hour at a home health care provider near her home in Commerce, Mich., nearly 15 months ago. She has been collecting $362 a week in unemployment insurance and about $50 a month in food stamps.

That covers the basics. But Ms. Metz stopped making her mortgage payments last year on the modest home she shares with her 19-year-old son. A program that allowed her to make a lower monthly payment has expired, and she is waiting to see if the lender will modify her loan. She can no longer make her student loan payments for her bachelor’s degree or master’s in business administration, and she has downgraded her Internet and cable service and cut back on car trips and snacks.

Ms. Metz, who has been applying for administrative jobs, has been shocked at the dearth of opportunities. A decade ago, when she applied for clerical jobs, “as soon as I walked up, there was a sign saying ‘We’re hiring,’ but it’s not like that now,” she said. “It’s really, really difficult.”

Businesses that rely heavily on low-income shoppers worry that their customers will have little to spend. Najib Atisha, who co-owns two small grocery stores in Detroit, said people receiving government assistance made up about a third of his customers downtown and as much as 60 percent at his store on the west side of the city.

“Of course, we’re hoping that things will turn around, but it’s always easier to lose jobs than it is to gain jobs,” Mr. Atisha said. “I think it’s going to take twice as long to rebound as it took to get where we are now.”

Some business groups argue that extending unemployment benefits has had deleterious effects on employers and potential workers.

“It’s having a chilling effect on hiring,” said Wendy Block, director of health policy and human resources at the Michigan Chamber of Commerce. “At one point, our unemployment taxes were just a blip on the balance sheet, but when you’re talking over $500 a head, this is significant.” Last year, Michigan spent $6.2 billion on jobless benefits, according to the National Employment Law Center.

Some economic studies show that people who collect unemployment benefits are less likely to look for or accept work until their benefits are close to running out.

“Unemployment insurance extends the typical amount of time that people will spend off the job and not looking for work,” said Chris Edwards, an economist at the Cato Institute, a libertarian organization.

In Michigan, Ms. Metz said that if all else failed, she would have to move in with her parents, who live on a fixed income. But she is determined to find work before her benefits run out and plans to expand her search to include light industrial manufacturing. “It’s getting close to the end,” she said. “And I got to do what I got to do.”

CBO Congressional Report- U.S. Could Face European-Style Debt Crisis

How about the accounts sticking to accounting.

Just in case you thought there was any hope:

But most ominously, the CBO report warns of a “sudden fiscal crisis” in which investors would lose faith in the U.S. government’s ability to manage its fiscal affairs. In such a fiscal panic, investors might abandon U.S. bonds and force the government to pay unaffordable interest rates. In turn, the report warns, Washington policymakers would have to win back the confidence of the markets by imposing spending cuts and tax increases far more severe than if they were to take action now.

U.S. Could Face European-Style Debt Crisis: Congressional Report

June 22 (AP) — The rapidly growing national debt could soon spark a European-style crisis unless Congress moves forcefully, the Congressional Budget Office warned Wednesday in a study that underscores the stakes for a bipartisan group working on a plan to reduce red ink.

Republicans seized on the non-partisan report to renew their push to reduce costs in federal benefit programs such as Medicare — the federal government health care program that benefits the elderly.

The report said the national debt, now $14.3 trillion, is on pace to equal the annual size of the economy within a decade. It warned of a possible “sudden fiscal crisis” if it is left unchecked, with investors losing faith in the U.S. government’s ability to manage its fiscal affairs.

Democrats and Republicans have been stepping up budget talks aimed at averting what could be the disastrous first-ever default on U.S. government debt. A bipartisan group led by Vice President Joe Biden tasked with reaching an agreement has not made the politically difficult compromises on the larger issues, such as changes in Medicare, or tax increases.

The study reverberated throughout the Capitol as Biden and negotiators and senior lawmakers spent several hours behind closed doors. The talks are aimed at outlining about $2 trillion in deficit cuts over the next decade, part of an attempt to generate enough support in Congress to allow the Treasury to take on new borrowing.

Biden made no comment as he departed, except to say the group would meet again on Thursday and probably Friday as well.

The CBO, the non-partisan agency that calculates the cost and economic impact of legislation and government policy, says the nation’s rapidly growing debt burden increases the probability of a fiscal crisis in which investors lose faith in U.S. bonds and force policymakers to make drastic spending cuts or tax increases.

“As Congress debates the president’s request for an increase in the statutory debt ceiling, the CBO warns of a more ominous credit cliff — a sudden drop-off in our ability to borrow imposed by credit markets in a state of panic,” said Republican House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan.

The findings aren’t dramatically new, but the budget office’s analysis underscores the magnitude of the nation’s fiscal problems as negotiators struggle to lift the current $14.3 trillion debt limit and avoid a first-ever, market-rattling default on U.S. obligations. The Biden-led talks have proceeded slowly and are at a critical stage, as Democrats and Republicans remain at loggerheads over revenues and domestic programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

With Republicans insisting that the level of deficit cuts at least equal the amount of any increase in the debt limit, it would take more than $2 trillion in cuts to carry past next year’s elections. House Republican leaders have made it plain they only want a single vote before the elections.

That $2 trillion-plus goal is proving elusive. And a top Senate Democrat warned Wednesday that it would be insufficient anyway.

“While I am encouraged by the bipartisan nature of the leadership negotiations being led by Vice President Biden, I am concerned by reports the group may be focusing on a limited package that will not fundamentally change the fiscal trajectory of the nation,” said Senate budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, a Democrat. “That would be a mistake.”

Democratic leaders, however, held a news conference Wednesday to argue for more economic stimulus measures such as a proposal floated by the White House to extend a payroll tax cut enacted last year. The move demonstrates the continuing appeal of deficit-financed policy solutions — suggested even as warnings of the dangers of mounting debt grow louder and louder.

“We absolutely need to reduce our deficit. We know that,” said Demoratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. “But economists tell us that reducing spending is only half the equation. The other half is measures to create jobs.

President Barack Obama planned to meet with House Democratic leaders Thursday to discuss the status of the deficit reduction talks. The meeting comes as Democrats want the president to rule out Medicare benefit cuts as part of any budget deal.

The White House said the meeting will address deficit reduction through a “balanced framework,” a term the White House uses to describe cuts in spending coupled with increased tax revenue.

With the fiscal imbalance requiring the government to borrow more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends, the CBO predicts that without a change of course the national debt will rocket from 69 percent of gross domestic product this year to 109 percent of GDP — the record set in World War II — by 2023.

The CBO’s projections are based on a scenario that anticipates Bush-era tax cuts are extended and other current policies such as maintaining doctors’ fees under Medicare are continued as well. The debt would be far more stable under the budget office’s official “baseline” that assumes taxes return to Clinton-era rates and that doctors absorb unrealistic fee cuts.

Economists warn that rising debt threatens to devastate the economy by forcing interest rates higher, squeezing domestic investment, and limiting the government’s ability to respond to unexpected challenges like an economic downturn.

But most ominously, the CBO report warns of a “sudden fiscal crisis” in which investors would lose faith in the U.S. government’s ability to manage its fiscal affairs. In such a fiscal panic, investors might abandon U.S. bonds and force the government to pay unaffordable interest rates. In turn, the report warns, Washington policymakers would have to win back the confidence of the markets by imposing spending cuts and tax increases far more severe than if they were to take action now.

Moody’s Analyst: Weak Growth, Fiscal Slips Could Lose UK ‘AAA’

The wonder is how Moody’s keeps it’s prized credibility and Sarah Carlson her prized job.

Moody’s Analyst: Weak Growth, Fiscal Slips Could Lose UK ‘AAA’

Jun 8 (MNI) — The UK could lose its prized ‘Aaa’ credit rating if growth remains weak and the coalition government fails to meet its fiscal consolidation targets, a senior analyst at ratings agency Moody’s has told Market News International.

Sarah Carlson, VP-Senior Analyst at Moody’s, told MNI that weak growth and fiscal slippage could see the country’s ‘debt metrics’ deteriorate to a point that would trigger a downgrade.

“Although the weaker economic growth prospects in 2011 and 2012 do not directly cast doubt on the UK’s sovereign rating level, we believe that slower growth combined with weaker-than-expected fiscal consolidation efforts could cause the UK’s debt metrics to deteriorate to a point that would be inconsistent with a Aaa rating,” she said.

Carlson also said that due to their sheer size the UK’s austerity plans have a degree of ‘implementation risk’.

“As is true of any large fiscal consolidation effort, the government’s austerity plans entail some implementation risk. Moreover, a multi-year austerity programme of this magnitude is a political challenge,” she said.

Carlson’s comments come in a week of frenzied debate as to whether UK Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s fiscal consolidation plans are working.

At present, the government aims to close Britain’s structural deficit will by the end of 2014-15, slashing departmental budgets by almost stg100 billion over four years.

But a weaker-than-expected Q1 GDP outturn and a slew of disappointing economic data since then, has led several economists to question the wisdom of such a rapid deficit-reduction plan while others have said there is no other choice.

On Sunday, a group of leading economists led by Prof. Tony Atkinson of Oxford and centre-left pressure group Compass wrote a letter to the Observer newspaper questioning the wisdom of the current plan.

Carlson said that the government’s creation of a cross-departmental committee to monitor progress in public spending cuts could be useful in reinforcing commitment to consolidation.

“The creation of the Public Expenditure Cabinet Committee (PEX) – a cross-government spending committee that will monitor the progress of individual departments against their budget plans – has the potential to be a promising institutional change that could further bolster confidence in the government’s ability to follow through with its ambitious austerity programme.”

On Monday, a group of centre-right economists wrote a letter to the Telegraph newspaper which argued against relaxing austerity measures.

In its Article IV Consultation Report on the UK released Monday, the IMF said that there had been unexpected weaknesses in UK economy over the past few months but labelled the troubles temporary and advised the government to keep to its current deficit-reduction plan.

DJ Moody’s:US Rating Could Be Negatively Affected by Tax-Cut Extension

Just in case you thought Moody’s knew anything about sovereign debt.

And how about those Democrats are using deficit terrorist rhetoric to try to fight back against the Republicans.

*DJ Moody’s Says US Sovereign Debt Rating Stable For Now
*DJ Moody’s:US Sovereign Debt Rating Stable Following Tax-Cuts Decision
*DJ Moody’s:US Rating Could Be Negatively Affected Over Longer Term By Tax-Cut Extension

DJ Moody’s Says US Sovereign-Debt Rating Stable For Now
12/07/10 12:51

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–Moody’s Investors Service said Tuesday that the United States’ top sovereign-debt rating is stable for now, but could be negatively affected by the extension of tax cuts and if the government can’t get its growing debt under control.


Moody’s senior credit officer Steven Hess said the country’s stable outlook wouldn’t be affected by Monday’s deal to extend current tax rates for two years, reduce the payroll tax for a year, and extend unemployment benefits.


He was speaking in a telephone interview with Dow Jones Newswires Tuesday.
Moody’s rates the debt of the world’s biggest economy at Aaa, its highest rating. The stable outlook means that rating is unlikely to be changed in the next one to two years.


However, Hess said the country’s outlook could worsen if the tax cuts are extended further and no other measures, such as spending cuts, are taken to get the ballooning deficit under control.


If the current tax cuts are extended again, “clearly that makes the long-term outlook more negative” for the U.S. rating, Hess said.

Anti US bias at Moody’s?


[Skip to the end]

Debt ratios are far higher in the Eurozone than the federal govt in the US, and the eurozone national govts are subject to liquidity crisis risk much like the US States.

Could there be some kind of anti US bias at Moody’s???

Rising Debts in Europe Won’t Trigger Downgrades, Moody’s Says

Oct. 22 (Bloomberg) — European countries’ rising debt won’t trigger across-the-board credit-rating downgrades because countries are measured relative to each other, Moody’s Investors Service said.

The worst recession in six decades and the stimulus measures used to moderate its effects are going to drive debt levels up in the euro zone and in the European Union over the next two years, the European Commission predicts.

“We are doing relative ranking of sovereign risk within peer groups,” Alexander Kockerbeck, a senior European analyst for Moody’s, said in an interview. “Part of the quality of an AAA country is to be able to absorb a shock of this kind.”

Moody’s ranks Germany and France among the countries with the highest credit ratings. European governments spent billions of euros to fight the region’s worst recession since World War II. As a result, the commission forecasts that euro-area debt will rise to 77.7 percent this year from 69.3 percent, and that it would advance to 83.8 percent in 2010.

Debt sustainability will continue to be monitored country- by-country, Kockerbeck said. Moody’s downgraded Ireland’s top credit rating in July, cutting it one step to Aa1.

While a temporary debt expansion should be expected, countries need to get their public finances under control soon because of the region’s ageing population, Kockerbeck said.


[top]

From the same ratings agency looking to downgrade the US


[Skip to the end]

Germany Retains `Stable’ Rating Outlook at Moody’s Amid Crisis

By Rainer Buergin

Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Germany retained a “stable” outlook at Moody’s Investors Service on its Aaa government bond ratings even as the financial crisis puts strains on public coffers, the rating company said today in an e-mailed report.

Moody’s, in a regular credit analysis, kept the “Aaa – stable” rating for Germany’s government bonds, the country ceiling and the bank deposit ceiling, both in foreign and local currency.

“Germany’s public debt payment capacity is strong and Moody’s anticipates no problems with regard to affordability or adverse debt dynamics, even with the impact of the economic slowdown likely to be felt on both sides of the government balance sheet,” said Moody’s analyst Alexander Kockerbeck.

Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government faces revenue shortfalls this year and will have to expand net borrowing in 2009 as the worst economic recession in at least 12 years takes its toll on the budget. Lawmakers last week authorized higher net federal borrowing in 2009 compared with 2008, the first increase since Merkel came to office three years ago.


[top]

Fed relying on ratings agencies?


[Skip to the end]

Ironically (?) after reading all the criticism of private sector lenders relying on ratings agencies rather than internal analysis I see this:

GE to use Fed’s commercial paper facility next week

By Rachel Layne and Scott Lanman

The Fed is setting up the special fund to buy commercial paper, and will start the program on Oct. 27. The U.S. Treasury will make a $50 billion deposit into the fund as an indication of support. The Fed said the maximum amount of commercial paper that could be funded by the facility is about $1.8 trillion.

The central bank will buy only debt with the top short-term ratings of A-1, F1 and P-1 given by Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service respectively. The facility provides for 90-day borrowing which may help lengthen the time periods for which liquidity is available.


[top]