Job sector trends


[Skip to the end]

Right, if you look at unemployment and the output gap in general as a % of the non government sectors
The drop is probably close to double the headline numbers.

This was a serious collapse of aggregate demand left to run it’s own course and reversed around year end only
due to the automatic stabilizers doing their thing the very ugly way.

A proactive fiscal adjustment — payroll tax holiday, per capita distribution to the states, etc. could have averted most of the economic losses that were allowed to happen.


[top]

U.K. June Mortgage Lending Rises 17% From May


[Skip to the end]

Deficit spending may be ‘working’
Who would have thought???…

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Milo wrote:

  • U.K. Mortgage Lending May Gain After Approvals Rose, BOE Says
  • U.K. June Mortgage Lending Rises 17% From May, CML Says
  • U.K. Office Demand Rises for First Time in Two Years
  • U.K. Property Asking Prices Rebound, Rightmove Says
  • Nissan to Build Battery-Manufacturing Plants in U.K., Portugal


[top]

Repost: Comments on Krugman


[Skip to the end]

Originally posted March 9th, 2009

Yes, but unspoken is the automatic stabilizers are quietly adding to the deficit with each move down, and the curves will cross and the economy start to improve when the deficit gets large enough, whether it’s the ugly way via falling revenues and rising transfer payments, or proactively via a proactive fiscal adjustment.

With income and spending turning mildly positive in January and other indicators such as the commodities also beginning to move sideways as the deficit passes through 5% before the latest fiscal adjustment kicks in, we may be seeing GDP headed towards 0 by q3 or sooner as most forecasters now predict. Unemployment, however, will continue to rise until real growth exceeds productivity growth.

Bottom line, there will be a recovery with or without a proactive fiscal adjustment. the difference is how bad it gets before it turns north.

Behind the Curve

by Paul Krugman

Mar 8 (NYT) — President Obama’s plan to stimulate the economy was a massive, giant, enormous. So the American people were told, especially by TV news, during the run-up to the stimulus vote. Watching the news, you might have thought that the only question was whether the plan was too big, too ambitious.

Yet many economists, myself included, actually argued that the plan was too small and too cautious. The latest data confirm those worries  and suggest that the Obama administration’s economic policies are already falling behind the curve.


[top]Rep

Federal Taxation (for Dummies)

Federal Taxation (for Dummies)

So why does the Federal Government tax us?

No, not to get money to spend!

In fact, if you pay your taxes with actual cash, they give you a receipt, a thank you, and then throw that cash into a shredder.

True!!!

So how does taking your cash and shredding it pay for anything??? It doesn’t!

And suppose you pay by check.

When the check clears, all the Federal Government does is change the numbers in your checking account downward for the amount of the check. They don’t get anything.

And so how does the Federal Government actually spend?

When they write you a check, and when the check is deposited, they change the numbers in your bank account upward by the amount of the check. This doesn’t use up anything.

They just change numbers.

Just like when you score a touchdown and get 6 points. The stadium gives you 6 points. But those points doesn’t come from anywhere and the stadium isn’t using up some pile of points it has when it gives you 6 of them.

Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke made this exact point when Congress asked him where the money for the banks was coming from. He told them the Fed just changes the numbers in their Fed bank accounts.

So this means, operationally, Federal spending is in no case dependent on tax revenues (or borrowing).

The Federal Government can’t run out of money as the President has been telling us. It doesn’t have any to run out of. All it does is change numbers in our bank accounts.

So then why does the Federal Government tax us?

Answer: to take away some of our spending power.

Why would it want to do that?

Because if it didn’t, then our spending of all the income and profits we make, plus all the Federal Government’s spending, would overwhelm the markets and cause prices to go higher and higher. There would be too much spending power chasing too few goods for sale. That’s called inflation.

So what does the government do?

They tax us to take away some of our spending power, so their spending, combined with our spending, doesn’t cause inflation.

That’s why the Federal Government taxes us. Not to get money for them to spend. They don’t use money when they spend. They just change numbers in our bank accounts.

So what’s the right amount to tax?

If they tax too much, we don’t have enough spending power to buy what’s left for sale after the Federal Government is done with its spending.

And that’s exactly what’s happening now. We can build a lot more cars and houses and other goods and services that we’d then like to buy.

But the Federal Government has taxed away too much of our spending power, so sales are way down and unemployment sky high.

Can the Federal Government go broke or run out of money if it taxes less then it spends and runs a deficit?

How can it? It’s just changing numbers in our bank accounts in its own monetary system run by its own Federal Reserve.

Why do they say deficits are bad?

Because they don’t understand their own monetary system and it’s ruining our lives!

Will lower taxes today mean higher taxes later?

Every year, taxes can be adjusted to make sure we have enough spending power to buy whatever we can produce and want to have.

Taxes only have to be raised if we have too much spending power, and the economy is doing so well and unemployment is so low we want to cool things down with a tax increase, to keep inflation where we want it.

So lower taxes today mean prosperity today, and higher taxes later only if things get too good and we get worried about inflation.

Europe Posts Trade Surplus in May


[Skip to the end]

Both imports and exports continued to fall in May as nothing there seems to be going right.

Europe Posts Trade Surplus in May as Imports Fall

By Emma Ross-Thomas

July 17 (Bloomberg) — Europe posted a trade surplus for a second month in May as exports declined less than imports.

Shipments from the 16-nation euro area fell a seasonally adjusted 2.7 percent from April, when they dropped 0.7 percent, the European Union’s statistics office in Luxembourg said today.

Imports slipped 2.8 percent, swelling the trade surplus to 800 million euros ($1.1 billion) in May from 700 million euros.


[top]

Homeowners Plan


[Skip to the end]

Glad they’re finally coming around!

Would have been nice to have offered this two years ago before a few million people had no choice but to leave and take down the neighborhood with them.

>   
>   (email exchange)
>   
>   Hi Warren,
>   
>   Treasury plan to allow foreclosed homeowners to stay in their homes.
>   

Administration Weighs More Foreclosure Aid

By Renae Merle

July 17 (Washington Post) — A top Treasury Department official told a Senate panel yesterday that the government is considering a proposal to allow homeowners to stay in their home as renters after a foreclosure.

>   
>   I am a huge fan of the bottom up recovery plans.
>   I still wonder why this was not implemented at the
>   beginning. We could have given a few hundred billion
>   to Americans and had this crisis already over!
>   

Problem remains they still don’t understand the monetary system or the function of federal taxation.

Thanks!


[top]

Southland home sales highest since late ’06; median price up again


[Skip to the end]

Thanks,

More and more evidence that it all started reversing when the great Mike Masters inventory liquidation ended late December as the automatic stabilizers did their thing (the ugly way).

Southland home sales highest since late ’06; median price up again

July 15 (DQNews) — La Jolla, CA — Southern California home sales rose in June to the highest level in 30 months as the number of deals above $500,000 continued to climb. June’s sales gain, plus another rise in the region’s median sale price, indicate buyers responded to price cuts on mid- to high-end homes and found it easier to secure financing for pricier abodes, a real estate information service reported.

A total of 23,262 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Riverside and San Bernardino counties last month. That was up 12.0 percent from 20,775 in May and up 29.0 percent from a revised 18,032 a year ago, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick.

Sales have increased year-over-year for 12 consecutive months.

June’s sales were the highest for that month since 2006, when 31,602 homes sold, but were 17.7 percent below the average June sales total since 1988, when DataQuick’s statistics begin. June sales peaked at 40,156 in 2005 and hit a low last year.

Foreclosures remained a major force in June, but their impact on the resale market eased for the third consecutive month.

Foreclosure resales – homes sold in June that had been foreclosed on in the prior 12 months – represented 45.3 percent of Southland resales last month, down from 49.7 percent in May and down from a peak 56.7 percent in February this year. Last month’s level was the lowest since foreclosure resales were 43.7 percent of resales in July 2008.

As the influence of deeply discounted foreclosures in lower-cost areas has waned in recent months, sales in higher-cost housing markets have increased and accounted for a greater share of total transactions.

Resales of single-family houses priced $500,000 and above rose to 19.6 percent of all existing houses sold in June, up from 18.0 percent in May but still down from 29.2 a year ago. The last time the $500,000-plus market made up more than 19 percent of sales was last October, when it was 19.9 percent. Sales of $500,000-plus houses dipped to as little as 13.4 percent of sales in January this year.

The recent shift toward higher-cost markets contributing more to overall sales has put upward pressure on the region’s median sale price – the point where half of the homes sold for more and half for less. The median dived sharply over the past year not just because of price depreciation but because of a shift toward an unusually large share of sales occurring in lower-cost, foreclosure-heavy areas.

The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos sold in the Southland last month was $265,000, up 6.4 percent from $249,000 in May but down 26.4 percent from $360,000 a year ago. It was the second consecutive month in which the median rose on a month-to-month basis. Before May’s 0.8 percent increase over April, the median hadn’t risen from one month to the next since July 2007.

Last month’s median was the highest since it was $278,000 last December, but it stood 47.5 percent below the peak $505,000 median reached in spring and summer of 2007.

“The rising median should still be viewed mainly as a sign the market’s moving back toward a more normal distribution of sales across the home price spectrum. Sales in many higher-cost neighborhoods couldn’t have gotten much lower, so this recent uptick in activity should come as no surprise. The recession and problem mortgages are fueling more high-end distress, hence more high-end ‘bargains.’ What’s missing, still, is a wide-open financing spigot for the would-be buyers of these more expensive homes,” said John Walsh, DataQuick president.

There were signs last month that credit was flowing a bit more easily for high-end buyers: The share of Southland purchase loans above $417,000 rose to 14.8 percent in June, the highest since it was 15.6 percent last August. “Jumbo” mortgages needed to buy pricier homes have been more expensive and much harder to obtain since August 2007, when the credit crunch hit. Before then, nearly 40 percent of Southland sales were financed with jumbo loans, then defined as over $417,000.

Bank of America makes the most home purchase loans in Southern California with about 20 percent of the market. Wells Fargo has 10 percent of the market.

In lower-cost “starter” housing markets, many first-time buyers continued to choose government-insured FHA financing. Such loans were used to finance 36.8 percent of home purchases last month, down slightly from 37.4 percent in May but up from 19.7 percent a year ago.

Absentee buyers, including investors who will have their property tax bills sent to a different address, bought 18.6 percent of the Southland homes sold last month. That’s up from 16.1 percent a year ago but down from 19.5 percent in May. The monthly average since 2000: 15 percent. Southland homebuyers appearing in public records with “LLC” in their names, meaning a limited liability company (used by some investor groups), accounted for about 1.5 percent of June home sales (345 sales). That’s down from a high of 2 percent in April but still well above the average of 0.6% of monthly sales this decade.

The year-ago numbers for Orange County and the region have been revised to include a late data update.

The typical monthly mortgage payment that Southern California buyers committed themselves to paying was $1,193 last month, up from $1,052 the previous month, and down from $1,762 a year ago. Adjusted for inflation, current payments are 46.0 percent below typical payments in the spring of 1989, the peak of the prior real estate cycle. They are 55.7 percent below the current cycle’s peak in July 2007.

Indicators of market distress continue to move in different directions. Foreclosure activity remains near record levels, while financing with adjustable-rate mortgages is near the all-time low but has recently edged higher. Financing with multiple mortgages is low, down payment sizes and flipping rates are stable, and non-owner occupied buying is above-average in some markets, MDA DataQuick reported.


[top]