Saudi price cuts


[Skip to the end]

This should keep a lid on crude prices, as Saudis decide to set lower prices:

Saudi Arabia cuts oil prices for US, Europe for May

by Timothy Coulter and Diana ben-Aaron

Apr 6 (Tehran Times) — Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest state-owned oil company, cut its official selling prices for all grades for customers in the U.S., Northwestern and Mediterranean Europe.

Saudi Arabia slashed the U.S. price of its Arab Heavy Crude the most, cutting it by $5.50 a barrel to $4.85 below the price of the West Texas Intermediate grade made in the U.S., the state oil company said in a faxed statement today. That wiped out its April price premium of 65 cents more than WTI, the first time Saudi heavy oil traded for more than the U.S. benchmark in at least 10 years.

Saudi Arab Light Crude was reduced by $4.15 a barrel in the U.S. and will sell for $2.25 less than WTI, Saudi Aramco said. Its April price was $1.90 more than WTI.

In Northwest Europe, Saudi light crude will be priced at $4.05 less than the IPE benchmark, a cut of $1.60 from a $2.45 discount last month, according to the statement. Heavy crude from Saudi Arabia for Europe declined $2.10, putting it $5.80 below the IPE equivalent.

Mediterranean, Asian Prices

Oil for Mediterranean destinations also cheapened, with Saudi light oil declining 90 cents to $3.05 below the IPE benchmark, and heavy oil falling $1.75 to $5.55 below the Brent weighted average equivalent as listed on IPE.

Saudi Arabia increased Asian prices for light grades. Saudi Arab Light Crude will sell in Asia for 80 cents more than crude from Dubai and Oman, a reduction of 10 cents from the 90 cent- per-barrel premium last month. The Saudi heavy crude price was cut $1.20 to fall $1.85 below Dubai/Oman crude.


[top]

Canada has it right


[Skip to the end]

Flaherty seems to have the fiscal aspects right today.

Anyone know who his advisors are?

Pace of bank remedies too slow, Flaherty says

by Eric Reguly

Apr 3 (Globe and Mail) — “Running large deficits is inflationary, eventually,” Flaherty said. “The spending will end. It is a use-it-or-lose- it proposition.”

Flaherty’s Conservative Party government is facing pressure from opposition parties and business groups to take additional measures to bolster growth in the world’s eighth-largest economy, on top of a two-year, C$40 billion ($32.3 billion) stimulus plan he announced in January.

Flaherty reiterated he’s in no rush to add to his stimulus plan and that Canada, along with other Group of 20 economies, is looking to see the impact of measures already taken. The Finance Ministry and the Bank of Canada will act together against the risk of inflation, Flaherty said.

In an interview with Business News Network today, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the size of the stimulus is less important than the speed at which money flows into the economy. He said new government spending could end up “crowding out” investments by businesses if it takes place in the middle of a recovery.

“The real issue with stimulus is less size than whether these various stimulus packages are actually going to get out the door,” Harper said.


[top]

Re: dangerous stupidity?


[Skip to the end]

Reich is right on things replacing demand but doesn’t know operationally how the monetary system works so we winds up losing the debate.

That’s why the media likes to have him on.

>   
>   On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Roger wrote:
>   
>   Where do they find these people?
>   
>   Unfortunately, on prime time news (& in both political parties)
>   

Robert Reich’s Dangerously Simplistic Economic View

by Joe Weisenthal

Apr 3 (Business Insider) — “Larry Kudlow’s favorite liberal says the key is for the government to replace lost demand. Turns out, there’s no such thing.” [that’s news!]

Listening to newscasters, pundits & politicians is like choosing your poison. Each waves their brand of dangerous simplicity – each of which is precisely wrong, or at best partially right.


[top]