OECD report
Posted by WARREN MOSLER on April 12th, 2012
The Center of the Universe
St Croix, United States Virgin Islands
MOSLER'S LAW: There is no financial crisis so deep that a sufficiently large tax cut or spending increase cannot deal with it.-
MMT: Taxes function to regulate aggregate demand, and not to raise revenue per se.
Warren’s Book:
Buy it or read it free online!
"The most important book ever written" -Elizabeth O'ToolRecent Posts
- Pending home sales and why housing matters
- whatever…
- Donation information and new home sales chart
- A few credit related charts
- Consumer sentiment, expectations, and current conditions
- Time to say goodbye? Schauble Calls on Italy to Pursue Structural Reform
- Housing and Philly Fed
- Microsoft to cut 18,000 jobs
- Industrial production, mtg purchase apps charts, homebuilder’s index
- Retail sales, credit expansion review, Empire manufacturing
-
The funds to pay taxes and buy government securities come from government spending.
Subscribe To:
Links
Internet Life
April 12th, 2012 at 9:30 am
Subversive morons? Just when you think a little progress is being made, the pandering to the deficit hawks and deficit doves shifts to overdrive,
No one in government seems to have the courage to tell the truth
Reply
April 12th, 2012 at 10:17 am
The OECD wants less the debt. Meanwhile the IMF says there is a SHORTAGE of quality government debt. See:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b597638c-83e8-11e1-9d54-00144feab49a.html
Bill Mitchell regularly tears strips off the IMF and I nearly always agree with him.
Can’t we get some terrorists to fly airliners into the headquarter buildings of the above two organisations – preferably with the staff inside?
Reply
Neil Wilson Reply:
April 12th, 2012 at 10:40 am
@Ralph Musgrave,
I understand the anger, but they need re-educating, not exterminating.
Nobody deserves to die.
Reply
Art Patten Reply:
April 12th, 2012 at 11:42 am
@Neil Wilson,
“Nobody deserves to die.”
And yet we all do. :)
(Not that it’s any reason to support this particular proposal of Ralph’s…)
Reply
April 12th, 2012 at 11:17 am
@Neil Wilson, Our decades will, if we don’t act. Or the decades will simply get lost, at best.
Reply
April 12th, 2012 at 11:23 am
I guess they got this news release just yesterday and stopped reading what happened afterwards
Statement by President Herbert Hoover on March 8, 1932.
“Nothing is more important than balancing the budget with the least increase in taxes. The Federal Government should be in such position that it will need issue no securities which increase the public debt after the beginning of the next fiscal year, July 1. That is vital to the still further promotion of employment and agriculture. It gives positive assurance to business and industry that the Government will keep out of the money market and allow industry and agriculture to borrow the monies required for the conduct of business. I cannot overemphasize the importance of the able nonpartisan effort being made by the Ways and Means Committee and the Economy Committee of the House whose work are complementary to each other.
Reply
Art Patten Reply:
April 12th, 2012 at 11:47 am
@Sidchem,
Had gold been nominally priced at its real value (~$40-50? vs $20), and had ongoing additions to the gold supply (or related adjustments) been close enough to optimal, Hoover would probably have been right. “Crowding out” can happen under a gold standard.
That said, there are fair arguments to be made (from both sides, imo) re just distribution of resources under gold vs fiat. Economic efficiency too (cue the Mises Inst acolytes gasping in horror…).
Reply
April 12th, 2012 at 11:54 am
I can’t believe this kind of agenda flows from honest economists who are simply misguided by theory. I suspect hacks who are bought and paid for.
Reply
April 13th, 2012 at 3:25 am
Yep.
Reply