By Professor James K. Galbraith
A more prosaic problem with the runaway-inflation scenario is that the “nonpartisan, professional” economic forecasters of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), whose work is often cited as the benchmark proof of an “unsustainable path,” do not expect it to happen. The CBO baseline resolutely asserts that inflation will stay where it is now: around 2 percent. So one can’t logically cite the inflation threat and the CBO baseline at the same time. So far as I know, the CBO does not trouble itself to model the exchange value of the dollar.
What the CBO does warn is that, under their assumptions, the ratio of US federal debt (held by the public) to GDP will rise relentlessly, passing 200 percent by 2035 and 300 percent by midcentury. Correspondingly, net interest payments on that debt would rise to exceed 20 percent of GDP. This certainly seems worrisome, and the CBO warns about “investor confidence” and “crowding out” without actually building these things into their model. Indeed, in their model this remarkable and unprecedented ratio of debt to GDP goes right along with steady growth, full employment, and low inflation, world without end! Why one should care about mere financial ratios if they produce such good—and, according to the CBO model— “sustainable” results is another mystery the CBO does not explain.