Credit spillovers from Eur banks to EM

Makes sense.

I always wondered how that loan demand was accommodated.
Never looked like the kind of lending US regulators would sanction.


Karim writes:

Interesting table from JPM.
Much larger dependence on credit from Eur banks for LATAM economies than from U.S. banks.
Poland/Russia not as surprising but still large!
Overall, domestic bank lending surveys in EM have also been moving towards a net tightening of lending standards.

Could be more severe credit contraction in those economies as a result of ongoing strains in Europe.

Euro area and US bank claims on EM
As of 2Q11
EUR Banks
US Banks
$ bn
% of dom cred
$ bn
% of dom cred
EM
1980.7
12.4
811.3
5.1
EM Asia
406.7
3.2
472.0
3.8
China
90.6
1.0
81.7
0.9
Korea
68.4
6.3
95.1
8.8
Latam
618.1
38.7
248.5
15.6
Brazil
285.0
23.1
97.6
7.9
Russia
113.5
16.1
23.8
3.4
Poland
249.0
95.6
14.4
5.5


Russian Central Bank spent $58 billion backing Ruble (Update1)


[Skip to the end]

Russian Central Bank Spent $58 Billion Backing Ruble (Update1)

By Alex Nicholson and Maria Levitov

Nov. 19 (Bloomberg) — Russia’s central bank spent $57.5 billion defending the ruble in September and October, Chairman Sergey Ignatiev said.

Why would they ‘defend’ the ruble? Maybe they ‘defend’ it selectively, via transactions with ‘insiders’ moving from rubles to dollars?

Russia held 45 percent of its reserves in U.S. dollars, 44 percent in euros, 10 percent in pounds and about 1 percent in yen on Nov. 1, Ignatiev, said in the lower house of parliament in Moscow today.

“Russia ensures the stability of its currency, given the fundamental indicators of our economy,” Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin told lawmakers today. The amount of reserves ensures “a firm foundation for macroeconomic stability, for stability of the national currency,” he added.

Looks like I’m wrong on suspecting insider conversion. Sorry!!!

Russia’s international reserves stood at $475.4 billion as of Nov. 7, the third-biggest after China’s and Japan’s. They have fallen $122.7 billion since Aug. 8 as the central bank shored up the ruble. The bank buys and sells currency to keep it within a trading band against a dollar-euro basket to limit the impact of exchange-rate fluctuations on the economy.

Right, that’s the reason…

Ignatiev also said that the central bank reduced its holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds, which are held by Russian oil funds that are part of the reserves, to $20.9 billion on Nov. 1 from $65.6 billion on Jan. 1.

Explains some of the spread widening.

Fannie and Freddie were “taken under state control” in the U.S. in September, guaranteeing their reliability, Ignatiev said. The bank isn’t currently selling bonds of the two U.S. mortgage- finance companies, he said.

Right, not even if an insider wants to buy them with rubles.


[top]

Re: Russia/OPEC


[Skip to the end]

(email exchange)

Thanks! it’s all about price setting, as previously suspected.

Warren

>   
>   On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Scott wrote:
>   
>   Moving on, we note that Russia and OPEC held high level talks
>   yesterday in Moscow as President Dmitry Medvedev met with OPEC’s
>   Secretary-General, Abdallah Salem al-Badri. This is, to the best of our
>   knowledge, the first such “summit” meeting between Russia and OPEC.
>   The talks, apparently, were to discuss the volatile oil market, and it
>   appears that Moscow is pushing for wider and more open co-operation
>   with other world energy producers. Neither the Kremlin nor OPEC
>   released details of the meeting, but before the talks between he and
>   Mr. Medvedev began, Mr. al-Badri dispensed with the idea that he’d
>   come to Moscow to ask for an output reduction. Obviously we do not
>   believe that statement, nor should anyone else. It is in OPEC’s best
>   interest to get Russia, Norway, and any other large… or soon to be
>   large, such as Brazil… to curtail production. Further, the ‘summit’
>   followed an agreement between Russia, Qatar and Iran to consult with
>   one another on the natural gas market, to possibly pursue joint
>   projects and perhaps to create their own nat-gas cartel. Mischief is
>   afoot. We can just sense it.
>   


[top]

Saudi Iran OIL Update


[Skip to the end]

Saudis say they will pump more if markets want more.

They post prices to their refiners and then fill all orders at their posted prices.

Their posted prices and spreads have also been moving in their favor lately.

Can it be more clear that the Saudis are ‘price setters?’

And with excess capacity very near zero, Russia and Iran are also price setters, and anyone else with more than a million bdp of output.

Price goes to the higher of where any of the price setters set their prices.

And the FOMC now knows this and will give the possibility of continuous price increases a lot more weight in their decisions.

Good luck to us!

[top]

Bloomberg: Russian control of energy to Eurozone


[Skip to the end]

Medvedev May Seek to Assure Merkel on Russian Energy Supplies

by Lyubov Pronina and Brian Parkin

Enlarge Image/Details

(Bloomberg) Russian President Dmitry Medvedev may seek to assure Europe of Russia’s reliability as an energy supplier and allay German Chancellor Angela Merkel‘s human- rights concerns in a one-day visit to Berlin today.

Medvedev will meet Merkel and President Horst Kohler and address about 1,000 business executives and lawmakers in his first trip to Western Europe as Russia’s leader.

“Energy will be at the forefront of talks and they won’t be easy,” Yevgeny Volk, a Moscow-based analyst for the Heritage Foundation, a U.S. research group, said in a telephone interview. “Russia wants to increase its energy influence in Europe, while Western countries would like to get more guarantees from Russia that deliveries will not fail.”

Note there is no discussion about price. The euro negotiators want to ensure deliveries with an agreement that is necessarily unenforceable in any case. Russia does have 25,000 nuclear weapons, for example.

Russia, which supplies 25 percent of Europe’s energy, has clashed with Europe over concerns that it abuses its role as Europe’s main energy source to further its political agenda. It opposes further eastward expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, U.S. plans for a missile-defense shield in Europe and Kosovo’s secession from Serbia.

Looks to me that Russia is in full control, and is using its position to enhance its real terms of trade, something never even mentioned by the Eurozone.

Germany and the European Union have pressed for guarantees that Russia will follow a uniform policy for supplying oil and gas across the bloc, weakening its capacity to wield energy policy as an arm of diplomacy. Russia briefly cut off gas to Ukraine in 2006 in a pricing dispute.

As if quantity ‘guarantees’ would ‘weaken’ anything. Apart from being unenforceable, it all misses the point of price and relative value.

Good luck to the Eurozone!!!

[top]

Reuters: Putin hiking wages and pensions


[Skip to the end]

As suspected, the political response to high food prices is to assist with government funding.

Yes, it’s inflationary, but politically there is little choice.

In the case of a relatively rich exporter of energy like Russia, they are helping their citizens outbid poorer nations for food:

Russia’s Putin promises to hike wages, pensions

by Gleb Bryanski

(Reuters) Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has said he will hike wages, pensions and social benefits to compensate people for rising prices and smooth the effects of anti-inflation policy.

“Through raising wages, pensions, social benefits and subsidies we will try to minimise negative consequences of our anti-inflation policy for the people,” Putin said in an interview with the French Le Monde daily attended by Reuters and released on Saturday.

Missing the annual inflation target by a wide margin has become the biggest policy failure of Putin’s last year as president in 2007 and is likely to turn into a major headache for his cabinet this year.

In his nomination speech in parliament this month, Putin said he was prepared to tolerate double-digit inflation for a few years. His cabinet has yet to present a comprehensive anti-inflation policy.

Putin said his cabinet was aware of inflation dangers and kept a close call on the situation. Inflation is running at 15 percent, making the cabinet’s goal of 10.5 percent for this year unlikely to be attained.

Seems Putin isn’t as worried about inflations as various critics would like him to be.

Russia’s inflation is a result of global food price rises but also a consequence of capital inflows from abroad as well as lavish budget spending ahead of parliamentary and presidential elections last year.

A more prudent budget policy would have helped Russia curb price growth this year but Putin signaled he was not yet prepared to risk his high popularity ratings. “We understand that this (rising wages) means an inflow of money into the economy but we are simply obliged to do it and we will do it,” Putin said.

Yes, politicians do respond to popularity ratings, and Putin is one of the best.

As I’ve written before, don’t underestimate Putin:

Wages grew by 28 percent year-on-year in April and some officials have warned that Russia risks falling into an inflationary spiral as Latin American countries did in the 1990s and have said that wage controls could be necessary.

Food makes up over 40 percent of the basket of goods and services used to calculate Russia’s consumer price index (CPI), a typical feature for poorer nations where the population spends a large proportion of income to feed themselves.

“We understand that food price growth hits those of our citizens who have low incomes. The share of their family budgets spent on food is big,” said Putin.

Putin, who is still coming to grips with his new role as premier, mentioned a recent rise of the refinancing rate — a symbolic ceiling of official interest rates hardly used in practice — among anti-inflation measures.

The central bank has little leverage over the economy, swelled with petrodollars, with its interest rate policy, but the market takes guidance from its deposit and repo rates rather than the refinancing rate.

Echoing his foreign policy statements, Putin blamed the West for Russia’s inflation problem too: “Inflation has been exported to Russia from developed economies, including Europe,” he said.


[top]

Bloomberg: Russian Oil Fund Should Be Tapped for Pensions

While relatively small, investing in pensions vs. ‘spending’ reduces aggregate demand. And ‘liquidity’ for the banking sector can readily be increased independently of these funds as needed.

Russian Oil Fund Should Be Tapped for Pensions, Kudrin Says

by Maria Levitov and Alex Nicholson

(Bloomberg) Russia’s Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin said the country’s oil fund should be used for financing pensions rather than boosting liquidity in the banking sector.

“The fund should not ensure liquidity. This is not its aim,” Kudrin said in Moscow today. Investing the $33 billion National Wellbeing Fund abroad and using returns to finance pensions is “the only correct way to use the National Wellbeing Fund,” he said. The government would always help to restore liquidity if this was required, he said.

Russia will eventually invest a small portion of the National Wellbeing Fund on the domestic market, once it becomes more stable and less dependent on oil prices, Kudrin said. Five percent of the fund may be invested in Russian securities “in the future” and that amount could gradually be increased he said.

The fund will not be invested in the Russian market this year, he said.