BERKSHIRE WARRANTS FOR 700M SHRS EXERCISE PRICE $7.142857/SHR

Once again, management is quick to sell the shareholders down the river with a fat coupon, low strike, dilutive preferred.

This is one of the inherent risks of being a common shareholder under current law.

It keeps stocks cheaper than otherwise, which makes them more attractive as takeover candidates, as
when you own the whole thing you don’t have this risk.

BUS 08/25 13:10 Berkshire Hathaway to Invest $5 Billion in Bank of America
BN 08/25 13:12 *BERKSHIRE WARRANTS FOR 700M SHRS EXERCISE PRICE $7.142857/SHR
BN 08/25 13:10 *BOFA TO SELL 50,000 SHRS PFD, LIQUIDATION VALUE $100K/SHR
BN 08/25 13:10 *BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY TO GET WARRANTS TO BUY 700M SHRS :BAC US
BN 08/25 13:10 *BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY TO INVEST $5B IN BANK OF AMERICA :BAC US
BN 08/25 13:10 *BOFA TO SELL 50,000 SHRS PFD :BAC US
BN 08/25 13:10 *BOFA TO SELL 50,000 SHRS :BAC US
BN 08/25 13:10 *BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY TO INVEST $5B IN BANK OF AMERICA

Berkshire Hathaway to Invest $5 Billion in Bank of America

By JoAnne Norton

August 25 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. agreed to
buy 50,000 preferred shares of Bank of America Corp. for $5
billion, the bank said today in a statement.

Re: Bank of America and moral hazard


[Skip to the end]

(email exchange)

>   
>   On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Morris wrote:
>   
>   Comments
>   
>   1. So LEH was ok to let fail?? What a ridiculous scenario–why were MER
>   shareholders more valuable than LEH? Thank you Mr Paulson
>   
>   2. BAC- just nationalize C and. BAC and get it over with- this is getting absurd.
>   

They don’t seem to have the following guiding view, so, they keep getting it all confused:

From a moral hazard point of view, it’s OK for the most part of institutions are too big to fail, as long as shareholders can fail, and creditors can lose.

That’s where the market discipline comes in.

The institution can be evaluated separately from a public purpose point of view without adding materially to moral hazard risk.

Also, the government can take senior positions for ‘compensation’ if it deems it valuable for public purpose, without taking common shares.


[top]

Bank losses remain less than a year’s earnings

(Reuters article)

Big Banks Lower Outlook, Overshadowing Fed Plan

Three major U.S. banks said they expect more write-downs and loan losses in the fourth quarter, eroding investor enthusiam over a Federal Reserve plan to ease the global credit crunch.

The warnings from the three banks, Bank of America, Wachovia and PNC Financial Services Group, triggered a selloff in financial stocks and reversed a huge rally in the markets.

Nell Redmond / AP

Executives of all three spoke at a Goldman Sachs conference in New York.

Lewis said Bank of America is likely to be profitable in the quarter but expects to set aside $3.3 billion for losses and write-downs.

Loss less than ¼’s earnings.

“While we do not make a practice of forecasting quarterly earnings, I think you certainly can assume results will again be quite disappointing,” Lewis said.

Wachovia’s Thompson told the conference his bank was facing “as tough an environment as I’ve ever seen” and did not know when the credit crunch would be over.

Thompson said Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia had boosted its loan loss provision for the fourth quarter to about $1 billion from a previous $500 million to $600 million.

He said fourth-quarter losses from commercial and consumer mortgages, leveraged finance and structured products, including subprime-backed mortgage securities, had reached about $1.4 billion, similar to the
level seen in the third quarter.

Pittsburgh-based PNC now expects to report earnings of 60 to 75 cents a share for the quarter, or between $1.00 and $1.15 excluding items. Analysts on average had expected PNC to report earnings of $1.33 a
share before items.

Still profitable as well.

The changes reflect a write-down of $1.5 billion in commercial mortgage loans, weak trading results amid market volatility and a higher provision for credit losses stemming from residential real estate development, it said.

Bank of America’s Lewis said he had hoped that the Federal Reserve would cut rates by half a point rather than the quarter point cut it made Tuesday “because the capital markets are still so fragile.”

Can’t blame him for trying!

Lewis said in response to analysts’ questions that the bank hopes to sell off some of its 9 percent stake in China Construction Bank starting in 2008 and is “talking to the Chinese to see what level they would be comfortable with us holding.”

Wachovia’s Thompson said despite the difficult environment, he expected to grow earnings in 2008. He added that the bank might consider raising capital next year in a “relatively inexpensive form,”
such as a preferred stock offering.

Seems to me these losses are ‘well contained’ and not threatening to interrupt business or aggregate demand.