<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Innocent Fraud of the Trade Deficit: Who&#8217;s Funding Whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:41:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-187997</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-187997</guid>
		<description>no, reserves can&#039;t leave the banking system.  they just go from bank to bank.  
(they are aka &#039;clearing balances&#039;)

any bank can lose reserves, but not the banking system as a whole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, reserves can&#8217;t leave the banking system.  they just go from bank to bank.<br />
(they are aka &#8216;clearing balances&#8217;)</p>
<p>any bank can lose reserves, but not the banking system as a whole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-187956</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-187956</guid>
		<description>Dear Warren,

if the foreign &quot;carmaker&quot; has only an account at a foreign bank, and the foreigners hoard dollars, but do not buy US assets, would then a continuous trade deficit not lead to a continous loss of reserves of the US banking system? And is this not one of the real problems of Greece, Spain and Italy, that their banks lose reserves because of a continuos trade deficit, and the lack of buying of assets of these countries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Warren,</p>
<p>if the foreign &#8220;carmaker&#8221; has only an account at a foreign bank, and the foreigners hoard dollars, but do not buy US assets, would then a continuous trade deficit not lead to a continous loss of reserves of the US banking system? And is this not one of the real problems of Greece, Spain and Italy, that their banks lose reserves because of a continuos trade deficit, and the lack of buying of assets of these countries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitt Romney is a (insert your own expletive here) Moron &#171; Opposable Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-185728</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt Romney is a (insert your own expletive here) Moron &#171; Opposable Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-185728</guid>
		<description>[...] We do not &#8220;borrow&#8221; dollars from other countries. The US is the sole creator of dollars. We only &#8220;borrow&#8221; those dollars because countries like China, who have accumulated lots of dollars through international trade would rather buy treasury securities that earn interest in stead of letting their dollars sit in non-interest earning reserve accounts. It&#8217;s like moving your money from checking to savings at the bank. Read Warren&#8217;s Mosler&#8217;s explanation of why this is so. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We do not &#8220;borrow&#8221; dollars from other countries. The US is the sole creator of dollars. We only &#8220;borrow&#8221; those dollars because countries like China, who have accumulated lots of dollars through international trade would rather buy treasury securities that earn interest in stead of letting their dollars sit in non-interest earning reserve accounts. It&#8217;s like moving your money from checking to savings at the bank. Read Warren&#8217;s Mosler&#8217;s explanation of why this is so. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-182569</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 10:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-182569</guid>
		<description>value and worth are all about prices</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>value and worth are all about prices</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-182568</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 10:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-182568</guid>
		<description>you are saying that prices going up causes prices to go up.  

read &#039;the 7 deadly innocent frauds&#039; yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are saying that prices going up causes prices to go up.  </p>
<p>read &#8216;the 7 deadly innocent frauds&#8217; yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Wilson</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-182521</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-182521</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-182504&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Haku&lt;/a&gt;, 

&quot;Say China wants to exchange their trillion dollars for real goods. Then they realiza that they cannot really buy much with it. &quot;

Say they don&#039;t.

Primarily because if they do, then the US won&#039;t be able to buy any Chinese goods with it.

Leading to economic collapse in China.

The problem is analysing China as though it is outside the system. It isn&#039;t. It is in a symbiotic relationship with the US and the rest of the world.

Any action it takes will reflect back on its economy. It cannot act in isolation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-182504" rel="nofollow">@Haku</a>, </p>
<p>&#8220;Say China wants to exchange their trillion dollars for real goods. Then they realiza that they cannot really buy much with it. &#8221;</p>
<p>Say they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Primarily because if they do, then the US won&#8217;t be able to buy any Chinese goods with it.</p>
<p>Leading to economic collapse in China.</p>
<p>The problem is analysing China as though it is outside the system. It isn&#8217;t. It is in a symbiotic relationship with the US and the rest of the world.</p>
<p>Any action it takes will reflect back on its economy. It cannot act in isolation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Wilson</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-182518</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-182518</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-182496&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Haku&lt;/a&gt;, 

There is no evidence there is an issue, so how can you be making it worse?

Fear is not evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-182496" rel="nofollow">@Haku</a>, </p>
<p>There is no evidence there is an issue, so how can you be making it worse?</p>
<p>Fear is not evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haku</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-182504</link>
		<dc:creator>Haku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 06:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-182504</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-181664&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@WARREN MOSLER&lt;/a&gt;, 

I think you are missing the point. The dollar is only worthy as long as you can actually exchange it for real goods and services.

Say China wants to exchange their trillion dollars for real goods. Then they realiza that they cannot really buy much with it. Thats when the dollar becomes worthless. It loses value. Now people see the dollar devaluating, so they try to exchange it for real goods before it loses more value, but nobody wants dollars anymore because its losing value. So hyperinflation kicks in.

Notice if the dollar devaluates you wont be able to import much goods, because nobody will acept dollars. So you will have to produce your own goods. But you cannot reestructure your whole economy in a short time.

I dont believe military will be the first consequence. I think the chinese know that they will never get paid (in real goods), thats why they are pushing for a new world currency. That is obviosly not good for USA. Now if someone oposes that, things might blow up.

I think the best thing you can do is gradually reestructure your economy in order to actually produce more real goods, becase thats what gives value to your currency. But it might be too late. As soon as investors and lenders realize they are losing value, things will get ugly, not just for USA, but for the whole world.

Also i dont belive im worrying about the wrong thing, i have some savings that i would lose if your currency crashes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-181664" rel="nofollow">@WARREN MOSLER</a>, </p>
<p>I think you are missing the point. The dollar is only worthy as long as you can actually exchange it for real goods and services.</p>
<p>Say China wants to exchange their trillion dollars for real goods. Then they realiza that they cannot really buy much with it. Thats when the dollar becomes worthless. It loses value. Now people see the dollar devaluating, so they try to exchange it for real goods before it loses more value, but nobody wants dollars anymore because its losing value. So hyperinflation kicks in.</p>
<p>Notice if the dollar devaluates you wont be able to import much goods, because nobody will acept dollars. So you will have to produce your own goods. But you cannot reestructure your whole economy in a short time.</p>
<p>I dont believe military will be the first consequence. I think the chinese know that they will never get paid (in real goods), thats why they are pushing for a new world currency. That is obviosly not good for USA. Now if someone oposes that, things might blow up.</p>
<p>I think the best thing you can do is gradually reestructure your economy in order to actually produce more real goods, becase thats what gives value to your currency. But it might be too late. As soon as investors and lenders realize they are losing value, things will get ugly, not just for USA, but for the whole world.</p>
<p>Also i dont belive im worrying about the wrong thing, i have some savings that i would lose if your currency crashes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haku</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-182496</link>
		<dc:creator>Haku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-182496</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-181690&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Neil Wilson&lt;/a&gt;, 

That would be reasonable except when the actions you take are making the issue worse. In such case its better to take the right actions instead of let it go worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-181690" rel="nofollow">@Neil Wilson</a>, </p>
<p>That would be reasonable except when the actions you take are making the issue worse. In such case its better to take the right actions instead of let it go worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Arnold</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-181892</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 02:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/mandatory-readings/the-innocent-fraud-of-the-trade-deficit-whos-funding-whom/#comment-181892</guid>
		<description>Is it also a way of maintaining a low exchange rate?  I mean by holding $US assets vs. transferring them to the holder&#039;s country...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it also a way of maintaining a low exchange rate?  I mean by holding $US assets vs. transferring them to the holder&#8217;s country&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

