The Center of the Universe

St Croix, United States Virgin Islands

MOSLER'S LAW: There is no financial crisis so deep that a sufficiently large tax cut or spending increase cannot deal with it.

Billyblog

Posted by WARREN MOSLER on February 18th, 2010

Professor Bill Mitchell’s blog is about as good as it gets if you have 20 minutes for a comprehensive, scholarly review of how it all works:

billy blog

5 Responses to “Billyblog”

  1. Bill Says:

    yes it is a good blog. he is better at explaining this stuff than you are, Warren. Sorry but it’s true. I think the obvious outcome to your theories being put into practice has just been described here – http://www.theonion.com/content/news/u_s_economy_grinds_to_halt_as

    :^) :^) :^)

    Reply

    Curious Reply:

    “he is better at explaining this stuff than you are, Warren.”

    I disagree. I prefer Warren’s short, clear explanations.

    Reply

  2. John Says:

    OMG, I knew it! I just knew it! All this time…wasted! All that work..for nothing! Who’s going to pay me back for all that?!

    Reply

  3. Lisa Says:

    [Found at Gang 8]

    “Punch,” April 3, 1957:

    Q: What are banks for?

    A: To make money.

    Q: For the customers?

    A: For the banks.

    Q: Why doesn’t bank advertising mention this?

    A: It would not be in good taste. But it is mentioned by implication in references to
    reserves of $249,000,000,000 or thereabouts. That is the money they have made.

    Q: Out of the customers?

    A: I suppose so.

    Q: They also mention Assets of $500,000,000,000 or thereabouts. Have they made that
    too?

    A: Not exactly. That is the money they use to make money.

    Q: I see. And they keep it in a safe somewhere?

    A: Not at all. They lend it to customers.

    Q: Then they haven’t got it?

    A: No.

    Q: Then how is it Assets?

    A: They maintain that it would be if they got it back.

    Q: But they must have some money in a safe somewhere?

    A: Yes, usually $500,000,000,000 or thereabouts. This is called Liabilities.

    Q: But if they’ve got it, how can they be liable for it?

    A: Because it isn’t theirs.

    Q: Then why do they have it?

    A: It has been lent to them by customers.

    Q: You mean customers lend banks money?

    A: In effect. They put money into their accounts, so it is really lent to the banks.

    Q: And what do the banks do with it?

    A: Lend it to other customers.

    Q: But you said that money they lent to other people was Assets?

    A: Yes.

    Q: Then Assets and Liabilities must be the same thing?

    A: You can’t really say that.

    Q: But you’ve just said it! If I put $100 into my account the bank is liable to have to pay it
    back, so it’s Liabilities. But they go and lend it to someone else, and he is liable to have to
    pay it back, so it’s Assets. It’s the same $100 isn’t it?

    A: Yes, but….

    Q: Then it cancels out. It means, doesn’t it, that banks haven’t really any money at all?

    A: Theoretically……

    Q: Never mind theoretically! And if they haven’t any money, where do they get their
    Reserves of $249,000,000,000 or thereabouts??

    A: I told you. That is the money they have made.

    Q: How?

    A: Well, when they lend your $100 to someone they charge him interest.

    Q: How much?

    A: It depends on the Bank Rate. Say five and a-half percent. That’s their profit.

    Q: Why isn’t it my profit? Isn’t it my money?

    A: It’s the theory of banking practice that………

    Q: When I lend them my $100 why don’t I charge them interest?

    A: You do.

    Q: You don’t say. How much?

    A: It depends on the Bank Rate. Say a half percent.

    Q: Grasping of me, rather?

    A: But that’s only if you’re not going to draw the money out again.

    Q: But of course I’m going to draw the money out again! If I hadn’t wanted to draw it out
    again I could have buried it in the garden!

    A: They wouldn’t like you to draw it out again.

    Q: Why not? If I keep it there you say it’s a Liability. Wouldn’t they be glad if I reduced
    their Liabilities by removing it?

    A: No. Because if you remove it they can’t lend it to anyone else.

    Q: But if I wanted to remove it they’d have to let me?

    A: Certainly.

    Q: But suppose they’ve already lent it to another customer?

    A: Then they’ll let you have some other customers money.

    Q: But suppose he wants his too….and they’ve already let me have it?

    A: You’re being purposely obtuse.

    Q: I think I’m being acute. What if everyone wanted their money all at once?

    A: It’s the theory of banking practice that they never would.

    Q: So what banks bank on, is not having to meet their commitments?

    A: I wouldn’t say that.

    Q: Naturally. Well, if there’s nothing else you think you can tell me….?

    A: Quite so. Now you can go off and open a banking account!

    Q: Just one last question.

    A: Of course.

    Q: Wouldn’t I do better to go off and open up a bank?

    Reply

  4. Robert Searle Says:

    Amusing!

    Nowadays, so-called credit creation as it is usually known as in the text-books is done electronically at the press of a button. In the past it was simply an accounting arrangement using pen, and ink!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>