<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Scott Brown&#8217;s Facebook page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:15:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16222</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16222</guid>
		<description>&quot;So what happens when they do decide to spend it. Does the amount at their disposal matter then?&quot;


short answer- yes.

spending is aggregate demand.

all spending supports prices to some degree.

spending for real consumption can reduce real consumption available to others.

and all in the context that exports are real costs and imports real benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So what happens when they do decide to spend it. Does the amount at their disposal matter then?&#8221;</p>
<p>short answer- yes.</p>
<p>spending is aggregate demand.</p>
<p>all spending supports prices to some degree.</p>
<p>spending for real consumption can reduce real consumption available to others.</p>
<p>and all in the context that exports are real costs and imports real benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hickey</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16212</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16212</guid>
		<description>Either exports increase if it buys US goods, or China increases its investment in the US if it buys US assets. Or may be they want to put it into fx, This goes on all the time. They sold us stuff we obviously wanted when we bought it from them. They can take the money and do with it what they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either exports increase if it buys US goods, or China increases its investment in the US if it buys US assets. Or may be they want to put it into fx, This goes on all the time. They sold us stuff we obviously wanted when we bought it from them. They can take the money and do with it what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16209</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16209</guid>
		<description>&quot;leaving china’s funds in a reserve account has no effect on the real economy unless china decides to spend them...&quot;

Yes. That makes sense.

So what happens when they do decide to spend it. Does the amount at their disposal matter then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;leaving china’s funds in a reserve account has no effect on the real economy unless china decides to spend them&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. That makes sense.</p>
<p>So what happens when they do decide to spend it. Does the amount at their disposal matter then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hickey</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16208</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16208</guid>
		<description>Kunai, when China sells stuff in the US the proceeds go into deposit accounts in the commercial banking system where China banks. These demand account require corresponding reserves in the commercial banks&#039; accounts at the FRS to settle China&#039;s accounts when demanded. 

Say that China uses its deposits to purchase Tys&#039;s. This converts reserves in the FRS reflecting China&#039;s demand balance into Tsy&#039;s. This is just the shift of one asset form into another.

When China decides to sell Tsy&#039;s, then the transaction just moves corresponding reserves back to the commercial banks with whom China does business and this is reflected by credits to China deposit accounts. China can then do with its money what it wants. Where&#039;s the printing and inflation? It&#039;s a wash, other than interest accrued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kunai, when China sells stuff in the US the proceeds go into deposit accounts in the commercial banking system where China banks. These demand account require corresponding reserves in the commercial banks&#8217; accounts at the FRS to settle China&#8217;s accounts when demanded. </p>
<p>Say that China uses its deposits to purchase Tys&#8217;s. This converts reserves in the FRS reflecting China&#8217;s demand balance into Tsy&#8217;s. This is just the shift of one asset form into another.</p>
<p>When China decides to sell Tsy&#8217;s, then the transaction just moves corresponding reserves back to the commercial banks with whom China does business and this is reflected by credits to China deposit accounts. China can then do with its money what it wants. Where&#8217;s the printing and inflation? It&#8217;s a wash, other than interest accrued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16197</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16197</guid>
		<description>glad to pass the torch- been advocating dropping tsy&#039;s and just paying interest on reserves for over 30 years

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glad to pass the torch- been advocating dropping tsy&#8217;s and just paying interest on reserves for over 30 years</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16196</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16196</guid>
		<description>right.  

lending is not reserve constrained.

leaving china&#039;s funds in a reserve account has no effect on the real economy unless china decides to spend them, which they can always do any way, regardless of policy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right.  </p>
<p>lending is not reserve constrained.</p>
<p>leaving china&#8217;s funds in a reserve account has no effect on the real economy unless china decides to spend them, which they can always do any way, regardless of policy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramanan</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16185</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16185</guid>
		<description>What if there is nobody to borrow? 

Are people waiting outside a bank in a queue waiting for the Fed to increase reserves so that they can get a first come first serve treatment ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if there is nobody to borrow? </p>
<p>Are people waiting outside a bank in a queue waiting for the Fed to increase reserves so that they can get a first come first serve treatment ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kunal</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16171</link>
		<dc:creator>kunal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16171</guid>
		<description>&quot;When China’s or anyone else’s tsy secs mature the Fed debits their securities account and credits their reserve account.&quot;

Excuse me, but just crediting their reserve account (equivalent to printing money) would lead to an increase in the money supply and cause inflation, not to mention devalue the currency. Bottom line - Deficits do matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When China’s or anyone else’s tsy secs mature the Fed debits their securities account and credits their reserve account.&#8221;</p>
<p>Excuse me, but just crediting their reserve account (equivalent to printing money) would lead to an increase in the money supply and cause inflation, not to mention devalue the currency. Bottom line &#8211; Deficits do matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Musgrave</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Musgrave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16153</guid>
		<description>Floccina. The UK reduced Value Added Tax (a sales tax) from 17.5% to 15% about a year ago to help deal with the recession. This was announced as a temporary measure, and everyone grasped the temporary nature of this change. Moreover, today’s headlines are that this tax will rise to 20% shortly. There are no riots . . . . . . yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floccina. The UK reduced Value Added Tax (a sales tax) from 17.5% to 15% about a year ago to help deal with the recession. This was announced as a temporary measure, and everyone grasped the temporary nature of this change. Moreover, today’s headlines are that this tax will rise to 20% shortly. There are no riots . . . . . . yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beowulf</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/08/from-scott-browns-facebook-page/comment-page-1/#comment-16062</link>
		<dc:creator>beowulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9720#comment-16062</guid>
		<description>I have a question for Warren and Scott,

Now that the Fed is wrapping its collective brains around how to set interest rates by paying interest on excess reserves (one can only hope they sit and read Scott&#039;s excellent paper on the topic) , would it require new legislation or does the Fed already have the power to allow Trsy to fund deficit spending by simply overdrafting its Fed account?  
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-26/fed-weighs-interest-on-reserves-as-new-benchmark-rate-update1-.html

Seeing as bond sales are no longer necessary to set overnight rates, Trsy overdrafts could replace interest paid to bondholders with interest paid to the Fed--which would then forward it back to  Trsy-- making the worry of $300 billion this year or $700 billion in 2019 in federal debt service payments seem rather pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for Warren and Scott,</p>
<p>Now that the Fed is wrapping its collective brains around how to set interest rates by paying interest on excess reserves (one can only hope they sit and read Scott&#8217;s excellent paper on the topic) , would it require new legislation or does the Fed already have the power to allow Trsy to fund deficit spending by simply overdrafting its Fed account?<br />
<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-26/fed-weighs-interest-on-reserves-as-new-benchmark-rate-update1-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-26/fed-weighs-interest-on-reserves-as-new-benchmark-rate-update1-.html</a></p>
<p>Seeing as bond sales are no longer necessary to set overnight rates, Trsy overdrafts could replace interest paid to bondholders with interest paid to the Fed&#8211;which would then forward it back to  Trsy&#8211; making the worry of $300 billion this year or $700 billion in 2019 in federal debt service payments seem rather pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

