<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dallas address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-52436</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 10:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-52436</guid>
		<description>china can buy what they want from willing sellers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>china can buy what they want from willing sellers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-52430</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-52430</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if China can take its FED bank statement and buy USA commercial real estate.  There are many banks that would like a buyer for commercial mortgage paper in default. A trillion USD would buy a lot of commercial deals which could be foreclosed.  China would then have &quot;real&quot; assets and the banks would have China&#039;s FED bank statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if China can take its FED bank statement and buy USA commercial real estate.  There are many banks that would like a buyer for commercial mortgage paper in default. A trillion USD would buy a lot of commercial deals which could be foreclosed.  China would then have &#8220;real&#8221; assets and the banks would have China&#8217;s FED bank statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempest</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49213</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49213</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;MMT says govt checks won’t bounce, but they can cause inflation and they do alter distribution.&quot;&quot;

Such is my understanding.

&quot;&quot;It doesn’t mean those programs don’t have economic and social consequences on which to judge the merits.&quot;&quot;

But that is not part of the MECHANICS of MMT correct?  And that they are not prerequisites to the existence of MMT.

&quot;&quot;That question ‘mixes metaphors.’&quot;&quot;

That is a source of great consternation over the last couple of days.  ;)  
If the mission of this site is to educate people, using clearly delineated terms would help, and that is what I am trying to accomplish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;MMT says govt checks won’t bounce, but they can cause inflation and they do alter distribution.&#8221;"</p>
<p>Such is my understanding.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;It doesn’t mean those programs don’t have economic and social consequences on which to judge the merits.&#8221;"</p>
<p>But that is not part of the MECHANICS of MMT correct?  And that they are not prerequisites to the existence of MMT.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;That question ‘mixes metaphors.’&#8221;"</p>
<p>That is a source of great consternation over the last couple of days.  ;)<br />
If the mission of this site is to educate people, using clearly delineated terms would help, and that is what I am trying to accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49209</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49209</guid>
		<description>&quot;But I think you will agree that topics such as SS and JG are not part of MMT?&quot;

That question &#039;mixes metaphors.&#039;

MMT says govt checks won&#039;t bounce, but they can cause inflation and they do alter distribution.

That means Social Security and JG won&#039;t &#039;bankrupt the nation and leave the tab to our grandchildren.&#039;

It doesn&#039;t mean those programs don&#039;t have economic and social consequences on which to judge the merits.

Such as support of our elderly, and providing a transition mechanism to move people from unemployment to private sector employment.

With the real cost being the food the elderly eat, the clothes they wear, etc. and the additional real consumption of the formerly unemployed who enter the transition job along with the benefits of any useful output and beneficial social consequences and reduced negative externalities including crime and family breakups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But I think you will agree that topics such as SS and JG are not part of MMT?&#8221;</p>
<p>That question &#8216;mixes metaphors.&#8217;</p>
<p>MMT says govt checks won&#8217;t bounce, but they can cause inflation and they do alter distribution.</p>
<p>That means Social Security and JG won&#8217;t &#8216;bankrupt the nation and leave the tab to our grandchildren.&#8217;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t mean those programs don&#8217;t have economic and social consequences on which to judge the merits.</p>
<p>Such as support of our elderly, and providing a transition mechanism to move people from unemployment to private sector employment.</p>
<p>With the real cost being the food the elderly eat, the clothes they wear, etc. and the additional real consumption of the formerly unemployed who enter the transition job along with the benefits of any useful output and beneficial social consequences and reduced negative externalities including crime and family breakups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempest</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49207</guid>
		<description>Believe me, I have been.  I&#039;m all about getting facts out into the open.

&quot;we all agree congress regulates the economy. &quot;

Thank you.  But I think you will agree that topics such as SS and JG are not part of MMT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me, I have been.  I&#8217;m all about getting facts out into the open.</p>
<p>&#8220;we all agree congress regulates the economy. &#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you.  But I think you will agree that topics such as SS and JG are not part of MMT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49183</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49183</guid>
		<description>so that happens to be a fact, not a philosophy.  

we all agree congress regulates the economy.  

that doesn&#039;t mean we like it, or agree with how they do it, or how much of it they do or don&#039;t do.

the difference here vs elsewhere is that elsewhere, including Congress and the President and the Fed, 
is they think the purposes of federal taxes (and borrowing) is to get dollars to spend.

And because they have it wrong, they are making decisions that are destroying and otherwise modifying our economy in ways
they would not be doing if they instead understood that taxes function to regulate the economy, and not to raise revenues.

That&#039;s all.   So please stop with your cheap shots and innuendos about MMT saying this and that.  
All it says is that taxes function to regulate aggregate demand, and not to raise revenue per se.  
And your job, now that you know this, is to get out there and spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so that happens to be a fact, not a philosophy.  </p>
<p>we all agree congress regulates the economy.  </p>
<p>that doesn&#8217;t mean we like it, or agree with how they do it, or how much of it they do or don&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>the difference here vs elsewhere is that elsewhere, including Congress and the President and the Fed,<br />
is they think the purposes of federal taxes (and borrowing) is to get dollars to spend.</p>
<p>And because they have it wrong, they are making decisions that are destroying and otherwise modifying our economy in ways<br />
they would not be doing if they instead understood that taxes function to regulate the economy, and not to raise revenues.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all.   So please stop with your cheap shots and innuendos about MMT saying this and that.<br />
All it says is that taxes function to regulate aggregate demand, and not to raise revenue per se.<br />
And your job, now that you know this, is to get out there and spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempest</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49178</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49178</guid>
		<description>Sure it is.  Congress uses taxes to regulate demand, and therefore the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it is.  Congress uses taxes to regulate demand, and therefore the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Franko</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49176</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49176</guid>
		<description>Temp,
A tax cut is not central planning.
Resp,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temp,<br />
A tax cut is not central planning.<br />
Resp,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49173</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49173</guid>
		<description>My fica tax suspension is designed to restore the private sector spending that creates funded jobs.  

My $8/hr federally funded job for everyone willing and able to work helps transition people from unemployment to private sector employment.  

Social Security is to support people of retirement age at some minimum that keeps them out of garbage cans.  Some humans value caring for their elderly, some don&#039;t.  you&#039;re entitled to your opinion.  then we vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My fica tax suspension is designed to restore the private sector spending that creates funded jobs.  </p>
<p>My $8/hr federally funded job for everyone willing and able to work helps transition people from unemployment to private sector employment.  </p>
<p>Social Security is to support people of retirement age at some minimum that keeps them out of garbage cans.  Some humans value caring for their elderly, some don&#8217;t.  you&#8217;re entitled to your opinion.  then we vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempest</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2010/02/04/dallas-address/comment-page-1/#comment-49153</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moslereconomics.com/?p=9707#comment-49153</guid>
		<description>So unemployment is bad.

What is the difference between unemployment compensation, and Social Security payments that you support?

They both pay people to be unproductive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So unemployment is bad.</p>
<p>What is the difference between unemployment compensation, and Social Security payments that you support?</p>
<p>They both pay people to be unproductive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

