<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-3/#comment-142129</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-142129</guid>
		<description>google translate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google translate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-3/#comment-142079</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-142079</guid>
		<description>We want italian version!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want italian version!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-1/#comment-137318</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-137318</guid>
		<description>nothing operational</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nothing operational</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-1/#comment-137309</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-137309</guid>
		<description>been trying, thanks!  feel free to promote from your end!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been trying, thanks!  feel free to promote from your end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bostick</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-1/#comment-137270</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-137270</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-135072&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Potomac Oracle&lt;/a&gt;, 

I know I should become thoroughly familiar with the principles of MMT but being an impetuous septuagenarian, here goes.  

What constrains a sovereign currency nation from funding all of the government/public sector budgets of all of its subordinate political jurisdictions (55,000 plus here), bypassing bond markets, and issuing to these entities interest free credits/currency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-135072" rel="nofollow">@Potomac Oracle</a>, </p>
<p>I know I should become thoroughly familiar with the principles of MMT but being an impetuous septuagenarian, here goes.  </p>
<p>What constrains a sovereign currency nation from funding all of the government/public sector budgets of all of its subordinate political jurisdictions (55,000 plus here), bypassing bond markets, and issuing to these entities interest free credits/currency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bostick</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-1/#comment-137209</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-137209</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-135150&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@WARREN MOSLER&lt;/a&gt;, 
Really?

Well, I woundn&#039;t know, not being an expert just a73 y/o someone looking for a better way to view the universe. 

Thanks for the feedback. 

Have you done the Diane Rhem&#039;s Show or anything at MSNBC, King World News?  

I wish you and your outstanding group of colleagues would go &quot;real big time media&quot; between now and June. Just getting the OWS folks to focus on facts like, &quot;the U.S. can&#039;t go broke&quot;...&quot;taxes don&#039;t pay for anything&quot;...&quot;zero interest rates are good&quot;, and being the &quot;sole issuer of the currency&quot; would stir the pot of political discourse enough to get the Tea Party to wonder about its harboring deficit terrorists.

Again, thanks for your brilliant insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-135150" rel="nofollow">@WARREN MOSLER</a>,<br />
Really?</p>
<p>Well, I woundn&#8217;t know, not being an expert just a73 y/o someone looking for a better way to view the universe. </p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. </p>
<p>Have you done the Diane Rhem&#8217;s Show or anything at MSNBC, King World News?  </p>
<p>I wish you and your outstanding group of colleagues would go &#8220;real big time media&#8221; between now and June. Just getting the OWS folks to focus on facts like, &#8220;the U.S. can&#8217;t go broke&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;taxes don&#8217;t pay for anything&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;zero interest rates are good&#8221;, and being the &#8220;sole issuer of the currency&#8221; would stir the pot of political discourse enough to get the Tea Party to wonder about its harboring deficit terrorists.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for your brilliant insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARREN MOSLER</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-1/#comment-135150</link>
		<dc:creator>WARREN MOSLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-135150</guid>
		<description>i wouldn&#039;t publish it either.  too many material errors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldn&#8217;t publish it either.  too many material errors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potomac Oracle</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-1/#comment-135072</link>
		<dc:creator>Potomac Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-135072</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-9485&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Warren Mosler&lt;/a&gt;, You may want to check out Ellen Brown&#039;s publisher.  She had a hell of her time getting &quot;The Web of Debt&quot; published here because the Fed didn&#039;t want it in circulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-9485" rel="nofollow">@Warren Mosler</a>, You may want to check out Ellen Brown&#8217;s publisher.  She had a hell of her time getting &#8220;The Web of Debt&#8221; published here because the Fed didn&#8217;t want it in circulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Heden</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-3/#comment-119146</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Heden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-119146</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-119140&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Hugo Heden&lt;/a&gt;, (well I managed to format that pretty ugly, but it&#039;s on page 61)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-119140" rel="nofollow">@Hugo Heden</a>, (well I managed to format that pretty ugly, but it&#8217;s on page 61)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Heden</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/12/10/7-deadly-innocent-frauds/comment-page-3/#comment-119140</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Heden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8662#comment-119140</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-118876&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@cleisthenes&lt;/a&gt;, 

Yeah, that&#039;s the conventional view you&#039;re expressing there. But as Warren notes (with my emphasis):

&lt;cite&gt;I’ve heard it all, and it’s all total nonsense. We are 
benefiting IMMENSELY from the trade deficit. The rest of 
the world has been sending us hundreds of billions of dollars 
worth of real goods and services in excess of what we send to 
them. They get to produce and export, and we get to import 
and consume. Is this an unsustainable imbalance that we need 
to fix? Why would we want to end it? As long as they want to 
send us goods and services without demanding any goods and 
services in return, why should we not be able to take them? 

There is no reason, apart from &lt;b&gt;a complete misunderstanding of
our monetary system by our leaders that has turned a massive
real benefit into a nightmare of domestic unemployment.&lt;/b&gt;

Recall from the previous innocent frauds, &lt;b&gt;the U.S. can
ALWAYS support domestic output and sustain domestic full
employment with fiscal policy (tax cuts and/or govt. spending),
even when China, or any other nation, decides to send us real
goods and services that displace our industries previously
doing that work.&lt;/b&gt; All we have to do is keep American spending
power high enough to be able to buy BOTH what foreigners
want to sell us AND all the goods and services that we can
produce ourselves at full employment levels. &lt;b&gt;Yes, jobs may be
lost in one or more industries. But with the right fiscal policy,
there will always be sufficient domestic spending power to be
able to employ those willing and able to work, producing other
goods and services for our private and public consumption.&lt;/b&gt; In
fact, up until recently, unemployment remained relatively low
even as our trade deficit went ever higher.&lt;/cite&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-118876" rel="nofollow">@cleisthenes</a>, </p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s the conventional view you&#8217;re expressing there. But as Warren notes (with my emphasis):</p>
<p><cite>I’ve heard it all, and it’s all total nonsense. We are<br />
benefiting IMMENSELY from the trade deficit. The rest of<br />
the world has been sending us hundreds of billions of dollars<br />
worth of real goods and services in excess of what we send to<br />
them. They get to produce and export, and we get to import<br />
and consume. Is this an unsustainable imbalance that we need<br />
to fix? Why would we want to end it? As long as they want to<br />
send us goods and services without demanding any goods and<br />
services in return, why should we not be able to take them? </p>
<p>There is no reason, apart from <b>a complete misunderstanding of<br />
our monetary system by our leaders that has turned a massive<br />
real benefit into a nightmare of domestic unemployment.</b></p>
<p>Recall from the previous innocent frauds, <b>the U.S. can<br />
ALWAYS support domestic output and sustain domestic full<br />
employment with fiscal policy (tax cuts and/or govt. spending),<br />
even when China, or any other nation, decides to send us real<br />
goods and services that displace our industries previously<br />
doing that work.</b> All we have to do is keep American spending<br />
power high enough to be able to buy BOTH what foreigners<br />
want to sell us AND all the goods and services that we can<br />
produce ourselves at full employment levels. <b>Yes, jobs may be<br />
lost in one or more industries. But with the right fiscal policy,<br />
there will always be sufficient domestic spending power to be<br />
able to employ those willing and able to work, producing other<br />
goods and services for our private and public consumption.</b> In<br />
fact, up until recently, unemployment remained relatively low<br />
even as our trade deficit went ever higher.</cite></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

