<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernanke quote revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-14292</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=9445#comment-14292</guid>
		<description>the deficits largely come counter cyclically due to the automatic stabilizers where they act to reverse contractions, so the data has to viewed in that light.

The proactive deficit was engineered by Bush in 2003, for example, and was followed by a reasonably expansion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the deficits largely come counter cyclically due to the automatic stabilizers where they act to reverse contractions, so the data has to viewed in that light.</p>
<p>The proactive deficit was engineered by Bush in 2003, for example, and was followed by a reasonably expansion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-14284</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodger Malcolm Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=9445#comment-14284</guid>
		<description>The problem is with the fundamental belief:  &quot;. . . a determined government can always generate higher spending and &lt;i&gt;hence positive inflation.â€&lt;/i&gt;

Since we went off the gold standard in 1971, there has been no relationship between federal deficits -- even large deficits -- and inflation.  [See the graph at &lt;a href=&quot;http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/introduction/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/introduction/&lt;/a&gt;

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is with the fundamental belief:  &#8220;. . . a determined government can always generate higher spending and <i>hence positive inflation.â€</i></p>
<p>Since we went off the gold standard in 1971, there has been no relationship between federal deficits &#8212; even large deficits &#8212; and inflation.  [See the graph at <a href="http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/introduction/" rel="nofollow">http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/introduction/</a></p>
<p>Rodger Malcolm Mitchell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Musgrave</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-13985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Musgrave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=9445#comment-13985</guid>
		<description>Raul Groom: I donâ€™t see any reason for thinking that, as you put it, â€œDuring any period in which government deficit spending is insufficient to support savings desires, the private sector will dissave..â€.  The whole problem is that this is exactly what the private sector does NOT do in these circumstances. That is, when households are in â€œsaving modeâ€ they just stay in that mode, with unemployment being the consequence.  This is Keynesâ€™s â€œparadox of thriftâ€.

Charles Yaker: â€œcreating jobs over thereâ€. Too right: the latest farcical example of this was Citibankâ€™s Â£8bn loan to Dubai six weeks after being bailout. It would have made more sense for the government /Fed to have printed Â£8bn of $20 bills and thrown them out of the window, preferably on a windy day. That would have eased the debts of indebted households and/or boosted demand in the US, and reduced unemployment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raul Groom: I donâ€™t see any reason for thinking that, as you put it, â€œDuring any period in which government deficit spending is insufficient to support savings desires, the private sector will dissave..â€.  The whole problem is that this is exactly what the private sector does NOT do in these circumstances. That is, when households are in â€œsaving modeâ€ they just stay in that mode, with unemployment being the consequence.  This is Keynesâ€™s â€œparadox of thriftâ€.</p>
<p>Charles Yaker: â€œcreating jobs over thereâ€. Too right: the latest farcical example of this was Citibankâ€™s Â£8bn loan to Dubai six weeks after being bailout. It would have made more sense for the government /Fed to have printed Â£8bn of $20 bills and thrown them out of the window, preferably on a windy day. That would have eased the debts of indebted households and/or boosted demand in the US, and reduced unemployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Yaker</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-13983</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Yaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=9445#comment-13983</guid>
		<description>My MY I guess we are paying for Jobs over there and not here. Do they really think we are that stupid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My MY I guess we are paying for Jobs over there and not here. Do they really think we are that stupid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaulGroom</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/11/28/bernanke-quote-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-13982</link>
		<dc:creator>RaulGroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=9445#comment-13982</guid>
		<description>Was chewing on this today and had a thought - possibly incorrect, so I thought I&#039;d inquire.

Is it correct to say that: 

During any period in which government deficit spending is insufficient to support savings desires, the private sector will dissave until either deficits increase or the private sector&#039;s increasing debt burden triggers a finance crisis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was chewing on this today and had a thought &#8211; possibly incorrect, so I thought I&#8217;d inquire.</p>
<p>Is it correct to say that: </p>
<p>During any period in which government deficit spending is insufficient to support savings desires, the private sector will dissave until either deficits increase or the private sector&#8217;s increasing debt burden triggers a finance crisis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

