more weak July data
Posted by WARREN MOSLER on August 19th, 2009
>
> (email exchange)
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Morris Smith
>
> Really lousy economic data continues about July
>
Yes, looking awful from a lot of angles.
This latest govt. attack on bank capital, especially small banks, might be biting deeper than the media is on to.
Amazon (AMZN-Hold)
Yesterday, comScore released July online retail data, showing total online spending falling by 7% y/y including a 5% y/y decline in non-travel spending. This data, combined with soft July retail and same-store-sales (SSS) and a weak outlook from Wal-Mart (WMT-Not Rated), reinforces our opinion that consumer spending may be slower to recover than anticipated. We reiterate our Hold rating on Amazon (AMZN) and our $83 per share price target.
comScore reported that July non-travel spending declined by 5% y/y, a sequential deceleration from the 1% y/y decline experienced in June and below the 4% y/y decline witnessed in May. Key category results were somewhat soft, with only Books & Magazines growing by 4% y/y and Consumer Electronics up 5% y/y.
eMarketer released data from the National Retail Federation (NRF) at the end of July indicating that nearly 50% of participating consumers were cutting spending on back-to-school supplies. Additionally, only 22% of respondents said that they would purchase back-to-school supplies on the web, down from 25% a year ago, with 75% opting to shop at traditional discount retailers.
July SSS fell 5% y/y, with the large majority of retailers posting greater than expected declines. The US Census Bureau reported that July total retail sales were flat sequentially but down 8% y/y, with sales down 9% y/y from May through July.
We now estimate that the impact on US eCommerce sales will be a 4% y/y decline in 3Q09 versus a 2% y/y decline in 2Q09, with low single digit growth in 4Q09. Ecommerce spending may decline by 1% y/y in 2009. This lack of consumer demand recovery represents a bit of an overhang on stocks like Amazon.
Amazon’s stock carries a premium valuation to other ecommerce, retail, Internet stocks and the S&P 500 Index, trading at 50x 2009E EPS and 21x 2009E OIBDA. The S&P 500 Index trades at 16x 2009E EPS of $60. Our ecommerce peer group averages 23x 2009E EPS and 10x OIBDA. Using a PEG ratio of 2.0x or 50x our 2009E EPS of $1.65, which equates to 21x our estimated 2009 OIBDA of $1.7 billion, our price target is $83 per share. We rate Amazon.com a Hold.
Orbitz (OWW-Buy)
We are reiterating our Buy on Orbitz (OWW) and raising our price target from $6 to $8 per share. We anticipate that Orbitz will be able to grow EBITDA by 20% y/y in 2009 and could nearly triple free cash flow through increased transaction volume growth and a sustainable cost savings program.
Transaction volumes improved 22% sequentially in Q2, helping to offset the removal of bookings fees on single-carrier flights, resulting in a better-than-expected gross bookings decline of 12% y/y. The removal of booking fees has stimulated consumer demand and shifted share from airlines to online travel agents (OTAs) like Orbitz. We expect further improvement in Q3, forecasting gross bookings to decline by 10% y/y. Q4 may only show a mid-single digit y/y decline in gross bookings, given an easier comparison and some potential price stabilization.
Despite the capacity cuts made last September, all of the major airlines have increasingly turned to the OTAs to shed excess inventory and generate revenue. Given the poor outlook published by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) for the global airline industry ($5 billion in losses, and normal traffic growth not returning until 2011), we anticipate that this trend will continue and may be very difficult to reverse.
Looking forward, Orbitz has committed to expanding its under-indexed hotel business globally. We believe that both Europe and Asia remain growth opportunities for Orbitz. Despite both Priceline (PCLN-Buy) and Expedia (EXPE- Buy) already establishing meaningful franchises on both continents, Orbitz should be able to capture a fair share of the rapidly growing international hotel market.
The cost savings program implemented in 1Q09, reducing expenditures by $40 million to 45 million annually, has driven EBITDA growth of 28% y/y through 1H09. Debt leverage has fallen from 5x to 4x based on our recently raised 2009E OIBDA of $160 million. Interest coverage has improved from 2x to 3x. Free cash flow is also forecast to nearly triple from $0.31 in 2008 to $0.88 in 2009.
Orbitz trades at 10x our 2010E EPS of $0.50, below a market P/E multiple of 14x. Our domestic e-Travel group reflects an average 2010E EPS trading multiple of 14x. Using a PEG of 1.1 or 16x 2010E EPS of $0.50, our 12-month price target is $8 per share. We rate Orbitz a Buy.
Yahoo (YHOO-Hold)
Recent data support our concerns about a sustained slowdown in online advertising. We continue to believe online advertising will remain muted in the third quarter as there has been no evidence of an advertising recovery to date. Yahoo remains vulnerable to declining fundamentals and a long complex integration process with Microsoft. We maintain our Hold rating.
Yesterday, comScore reported that July e-commerce non-travel spending declined 5% y/y and 6% sequentially. This was the largest monthly annual decline in 2009. We do not believe this bodes well for an online advertising recovery in the third quarter, particularly when combined with the University of Michigan’s preliminary consumer confidence sentiment number for the month of August, which showed a continued decline from July.
Yahoo continues to experience a continuous search market share loss in the US. According to comScore, Yahoo’s US search share stood at 19.3% in July, which represents a consistent monthly decline from 21.0% in January.
Data suggests Yahoo’s search ad coverage is down significantly y/y and dropped materially month/month in July. Ad coverage data coincides with a poor July e-commerce report.
This news does not bode well for Google, which also experienced a sequential decline in ad coverage during July. Google also saw a slight US search market share loss to Bing in July to 64.7% from 65.0% in June.
Our channel checks and the comScore data do not support Yahoo’s commentary at last week’s investor conference, where the Company remarked that it saw “green shoots” in ad sales and saw near-term ad budgets coming back. In addition, this commentary is inconsistent with Yahoo’s weak third quarter guidance.
Yahoo continues to battle departures amongst its executive team. Last week, Yahoo’s VP of West Coast sales announced his departure after three years at the Company. Yahoo also recently lost its VP of sales in New England and Canada.
We maintain our cautious view of the online advertising space as we forecast no growth in online advertising during 2009. Yahoo trades at 7x 2009E OIBDA, which is fairly valued in our view, particularly given expectations of a long drawn-out integration process with Microsoft and our concerns about Yahoo’s strategy and growth.
[top]







August 19th, 2009 at 11:23 pm
Warren, in a twist for me, I have some really positive news for you next to all this negative economic data. Since I can’t afford to travel anymore because my house ATM is closed, and no banks will give me anymore easy money to buy a REAL MT900 super car and you still haven’t offered one to me for free, I have to find cheaper forms of entertainment.
I went to siggraph last week, where lots of game developers preview new games. Electronic Arts (EA) the makers of a new NEED FOR SPEED racing game called SHIFT was there and I spoke with the developers. It has some of the best physics of any racing simulation ever. Habib Zargarpour is the lead art developer for the game and we talked awhile.
http://www.mtbs3d.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=4084
My dream is to be able to drive an MT900, and virtually would be all I could afford right now. What do you say about getting the MT900 into this game so all us poor people can enjoy your creation?
An article on how the physics of this game will revolutionize racing sims:
http://www.autosimsport.net/index2/index.php/online-article-list/169-assmag-vol5-iss1
Reply
August 20th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
“This latest govt. attack on bank capital, especially small banks, might be biting deeper than the media is on to.”
The government is treating big banks more favorably than small banks?
Do small banks have access to the same bailout programs large banks seem to enjoy?
Are small banks able to borrow at interbank rates of 0% or is there still concern over credit risk?
Reply
August 20th, 2009 at 3:10 pm
small banks are at a disadvantage. their cost of deposits is at least libor plus 50 for the most part, and the govt told us to withdraw our tarp application as they don’t want to be seen refusing us, or something like that, if they decided our financials weren’t strong enough to qualify. It was the opposite for the larger banks.
Reply
winterspeak Reply:
August 20th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Yup. ABA seems to be focusing on big banks more too.
Reply
August 20th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Sounds like the real economy is tilted towards the financial sector yet the financial sector is tilted towards the large banks.
Heard this on Marketplace today….
Executives with BBVA told Melville that U.S. banks are destined for consolidation, and BBVA wants a piece of the paella.
http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/08/20/pm-spanish-bank/
Reply