<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California bill to allow IOU&#8217;s for State tax payments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/2009/07/13/california-bill-to-allow-ious-for-state-tax-payments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/07/13/california-bill-to-allow-ious-for-state-tax-payments/</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Baird</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/07/13/california-bill-to-allow-ious-for-state-tax-payments/comment-page-1/#comment-8596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Baird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8436#comment-8596</guid>
		<description>One way they could encourage payment in Arnie dollars would to offer a discount, say 5%, for payments made in them.  It would stabilize the exchange rate while stopping short of full convertability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way they could encourage payment in Arnie dollars would to offer a discount, say 5%, for payments made in them.  It would stabilize the exchange rate while stopping short of full convertability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaid</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/07/13/california-bill-to-allow-ious-for-state-tax-payments/comment-page-1/#comment-8594</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8436#comment-8594</guid>
		<description>Does Chartalist theory distinguish between demand created from an &quot;optional&quot; vs. &quot;mandatory&quot; ability to settle taxes in the state money?

In other words, I can still settle my tax bill in US$; so there&#039;s less demand for California scrip than if it were the only state money accepted as tax payment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Chartalist theory distinguish between demand created from an &#8220;optional&#8221; vs. &#8220;mandatory&#8221; ability to settle taxes in the state money?</p>
<p>In other words, I can still settle my tax bill in US$; so there&#8217;s less demand for California scrip than if it were the only state money accepted as tax payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BerkShares, Buckaroos, and Bear Dollars: What Makes a Local Currency Tick?</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/07/13/california-bill-to-allow-ious-for-state-tax-payments/comment-page-1/#comment-8577</link>
		<dc:creator>BerkShares, Buckaroos, and Bear Dollars: What Makes a Local Currency Tick?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8436#comment-8577</guid>
		<description>[...] Marshall Auerbach, Warren Mosler, and I have been arguing, California can turn its warrants into sovereign currency by agreeing to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marshall Auerbach, Warren Mosler, and I have been arguing, California can turn its warrants into sovereign currency by agreeing to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSG</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2009/07/13/california-bill-to-allow-ious-for-state-tax-payments/comment-page-1/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>RSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=8436#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Why would the ramifications be profound? California, under the governership of Pete Wilson did it in 1992, i think about $4 bn worth.  Also the scope of what can be paid for in iou&#039;s is fairly restrictive given certain state constitutional and federal laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the ramifications be profound? California, under the governership of Pete Wilson did it in 1992, i think about $4 bn worth.  Also the scope of what can be paid for in iou&#8217;s is fairly restrictive given certain state constitutional and federal laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

