Re: Obama gas tax?
Posted by WARREN MOSLER on January 5th, 2009
(email exchange)
And this is even worse than the conservation motive:
“Motorists are driving less and buying less gasoline, which means fuel taxes aren’t raising enough money to keep pace with the cost of road, bridge and transit programs.
That has the federal commission that oversees financing for transportation talking about increasing the federal fuel tax.
A 50 percent increase in gasoline and diesel fuel taxes is being urged by the commission to finance highway construction and repair until the government devises another way for motorists to pay for using public roads. “
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Deep wrote:
>
> Hi Warren, Karim,
>
> I heard talk of a possible gas tax to make
> consumers change habits / retain the good
> ones gained over the last 6 months.
>
> It sounds like they want to keep price of gas
> at the pump high either directly by Crude
> being high (increase in demand, decrease in
> supply) or through these artificial measures
> and thus force a change in Oil consumption
> patterns. If implemented I can only see
> negative impacts over the 6m timeframe -
>
> a) crimp consumption further by removing $
> from the consumer
>
> b) hurt US Car manufacturer jobs whose
> bottom line seems more leveraged to high gas
> prices than foreign manufacturers
>
> c) accelerate headline inflation possibly forcing
> the Fed to tighten
>
Yes, and worse. Using a gas tax to allocate by price is highly regressive. It means the upper income Americans can have any size SUV they want for safety and prestige and drive all they want, while lower income Americans have to car pool to work in tiny cars.
Seems a Democratic administration would not use allocation (rationing) by price but instead use other, non regressive means of allocation.
Either the Dems don’t know any better or they are now controlled by upper income Americans as the Reps are?
>
> All this, together with a delayed fiscal package
> will likely hit any recovery in consumption.
>
Yes, it would mean we need a larger fiscal package. But not so large to allow all to afford the new gas tax.
>
> Would love to get your thoughts.
>
Seems the political logic remains convoluted, at best!
>
> Thanks, Deep
>
[top]
January 5th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
“Either the Dems don’t know any better or they are now controlled by upper income Americans as the Reps are?”
Of course they are. With the exception of Reich perhaps, Obama’s economic team are all fiscal conservatives and/or supply side corporate shills.
Furthermore, there is a good chance that his entire stimulus proposal will fail to pass because Senate Republicans still have the ability to obstruct it.
Obama’s confident pronouncements about a large stimulus and rapid passage may be nothing more than clever political strategy, so that when the whole thing goes down in flames he can blame Republicans.
And as always, we the people are merely pawns in this political game.
Bottom line: I’ll believe it when I see it.
Reply
January 5th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
seems this tax cut is to placate republicans and keep them from disrupting the rest of the package?
sorry to be looking on the bright side all the time…
Reply
January 5th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
You mean so that the Republicans can claim it was their dogged insistence on tax cuts that eventually turned the economy around? Would Obama be so politically naive to give them such a gift?
Doubtful.
More likely is that he and the Democratic leadership are looking to set a trap in order to do away with these extremists once and for all.
What better way than to get the nation psyched up for a saving stroke of policy, only to have the fundamentalist extremist Republicans scuttle it at the last minute, sending stocks and the economy crashing.
Then, using his rhetorical brilliance, Obama will place the blame squarely upon them, setting up another shot for the passage of the stimulus in the summer, at which time it will pass, sending the Republicans to crushing defeat for at least the next four years.
Reply
January 5th, 2009 at 7:19 pm
I read that they are thinking of a mileage tax instead, this would stop the people driving the economic car’s from paying less. Not fair to me and my Echo!
Reply