<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Wall St. Journal OpEd piece by Christopher Wood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/</link>
	<description>St Croix, United States Virgin Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: everybodyplays en ligne pkr</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>everybodyplays en ligne pkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;everybodyplays en ligne pkr...&lt;/strong&gt;

fisher poll buttressed ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>everybodyplays en ligne pkr&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>fisher poll buttressed &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>yes, but at least he does seem to be (very) slowly coming around:

Even though the Fed&#039;s liquidity injections, which have expanded the Fed balance sheet by well over a trillion dollars, have been extremely useful in limiting the negative impacts of the financial crisis, they have not been enough. A fiscal stimulus package is needed to keep the U.S. economy from entering into a deep recession. The $500 billion question is whether the fiscal package can be done right so it has the maximum impact in the short-run but does not lead to future tax burdens that are unsustainable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, but at least he does seem to be (very) slowly coming around:</p>
<p>Even though the Fed&#8217;s liquidity injections, which have expanded the Fed balance sheet by well over a trillion dollars, have been extremely useful in limiting the negative impacts of the financial crisis, they have not been enough. A fiscal stimulus package is needed to keep the U.S. economy from entering into a deep recession. The $500 billion question is whether the fiscal package can be done right so it has the maximum impact in the short-run but does not lead to future tax burdens that are unsustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knapp</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>Mishkin reponds: Fed Still Has Plenty of Ammunition:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122930150285205469.html

Mishkin quote: 
&quot;The fact that monetary policy is more potent than during normal times argues for even more aggressive easing during financial crises.&quot;

A Neoclassical view that ascribes more power to monetary policy than it actually has, a view that is only marginally different than his target, Christopher Woods. Both think that monetary policy is very potent during normal times, Woods less so during a crisis.

Knapp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mishkin reponds: Fed Still Has Plenty of Ammunition:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122930150285205469.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122930150285205469.html</a></p>
<p>Mishkin quote:<br />
&#8220;The fact that monetary policy is more potent than during normal times argues for even more aggressive easing during financial crises.&#8221;</p>
<p>A Neoclassical view that ascribes more power to monetary policy than it actually has, a view that is only marginally different than his target, Christopher Woods. Both think that monetary policy is very potent during normal times, Woods less so during a crisis.</p>
<p>Knapp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>did 20 min at univ of newcastle for bill mitchell&#039;s conference.  then off to a friend&#039;s wedding and a boat ride.  home soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did 20 min at univ of newcastle for bill mitchell&#8217;s conference.  then off to a friend&#8217;s wedding and a boat ride.  home soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2727</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2727</guid>
		<description>Warren

In Australia? Are you doing any public speaking engagements? I&#039;d like to come along and listen if possible.

Regards
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren</p>
<p>In Australia? Are you doing any public speaking engagements? I&#8217;d like to come along and listen if possible.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mosler</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mosler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>next thing they&#039;ll do is crown bernanke the &#039;Prints of Money&#039;???

sorry, been in australia too long.  got 10 more days here.  and not much email access next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next thing they&#8217;ll do is crown bernanke the &#8216;Prints of Money&#8217;???</p>
<p>sorry, been in australia too long.  got 10 more days here.  and not much email access next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich W</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2711</guid>
		<description>Yea, they do seem committed to some substantial deficits for the next two years at least. Volker&#039;s probably gonna need CPR if it happens though. 

Anyone else tired of hearing the phrase &quot;print money&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, they do seem committed to some substantial deficits for the next two years at least. Volker&#8217;s probably gonna need CPR if it happens though. </p>
<p>Anyone else tired of hearing the phrase &#8220;print money&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Potter</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>Rich:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/02/news/economy/obama_talks_aid_with_governors/index.htm

Looks like Obama wants to do something; he and the others seem to still be too focused on debt to do enough, though.  They quote Obama at the end of the article saying &quot;We&#039;re not as a nation going to keep being able to print money&quot;.   That mindset doesn&#039;t bode well for prospects of extensive revenue sharing.  Perhaps he should check out the articles on this site.  I&#039;m happy that they&#039;re looking at a bottom-up approach, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich:<br />
<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/02/news/economy/obama_talks_aid_with_governors/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/02/news/economy/obama_talks_aid_with_governors/index.htm</a></p>
<p>Looks like Obama wants to do something; he and the others seem to still be too focused on debt to do enough, though.  They quote Obama at the end of the article saying &#8220;We&#8217;re not as a nation going to keep being able to print money&#8221;.   That mindset doesn&#8217;t bode well for prospects of extensive revenue sharing.  Perhaps he should check out the articles on this site.  I&#8217;m happy that they&#8217;re looking at a bottom-up approach, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich W</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>Bit off topic but...

The states are facing a huge fiscal crunch right now. Why isn&#039;t the federal govt stepping up to provide money to the states?

I&#039;m sure the state spending is ready to go. All they need is the money. Seems stupid not to cover their shortfalls. Certainly would have a more immediate impact than new capital improvement spending (though I&#039;m sure a lot of state spending is capex).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit off topic but&#8230;</p>
<p>The states are facing a huge fiscal crunch right now. Why isn&#8217;t the federal govt stepping up to provide money to the states?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the state spending is ready to go. All they need is the money. Seems stupid not to cover their shortfalls. Certainly would have a more immediate impact than new capital improvement spending (though I&#8217;m sure a lot of state spending is capex).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zanon</title>
		<link>http://moslereconomics.com/2008/12/01/re-wall-st-journal-oped-piece-by-christopher-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>zanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moslereconomics.com/?p=5304#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>thanks scott -- will check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks scott &#8212; will check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

