Outstanding advances under Fed ‘unlimited’ swap lines to the 4 foreign CB’s plus several lines with limits no totals $615 billion and accelerating!
[top]
Outstanding advances under Fed ‘unlimited’ swap lines to the 4 foreign CB’s plus several lines with limits no totals $615 billion and accelerating!
[top]
Survey | -4.4% |
Actual | -4.7% |
Prior | -3.0% |
Revised | -3.3% |
Decelerating rapidly!
Survey | 8.2% |
Actual | 6.7% |
Prior | 14.5% |
Revised | 13.6% |
Decelerating rapidly!
Karim writes:
Price pressures continue to fall sharply:
Survey | -2.1% |
Actual | -2.8% |
Prior | -1.2% |
Revised | -1.3% |
This is a severe dropoff!
Karim writes:
Largest ever monthly drop in U.S. retail sales:
Survey | n/a |
Actual | -4.1% |
Prior | -1.1% |
Revised | n/a |
Looks very bad!
Survey | -1.2% |
Actual | -2.2% |
Prior | -0.6% |
Revised | -0.5% |
Same!
Survey | -0.1% |
Actual | -0.2% |
Prior | 0.3% |
Revised | 0.2% |
Interesting drop- not recession like at all.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 5.5% |
Prior | 6.3% |
Revised | n/a |
[top]
(email exchange)
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Morris wrote:
>
> The Muni stuff is more interesting… See the data…if the USA loses AAA.,
> what does that make states with Budget Gaps of over 10pct of GDP and
> NO capability for a funding mechanism to print money????
>
Dependent on the US government/banks for credit, like the rest of us- (we may now need both a payroll tax holiday and a trillion or so of revenue sharing for the states).
And restoring growth and employment is no big deal, actually, if government sustains demand at reasonable levels, which it always, readily, can do.
We sent men to the moon 40 years ago, cram mind boggling technology into cell phones, do robotic surgery, and don’t understand how a simple spreadsheet called the monetary system works.
Remarkable!
US May Lose Its ‘AAA’ Rating
The United States may be on course to lose its ‘AAA’ rating due to the large amount of debt it has accumulated, according to Martin Hennecke, senior manager of private clients at Tyche.
Yes, that may happen, as ratings agencies have no clue how it all actually works.
“The U.S. might really have to look at a default on the bankruptcy reorganization of the present financial system” and the bankruptcy of the government is not out of the realm of possibility, Hennecke said.
With government spending not constrained by revenue, any such event would be an unnecessary political response.
“In the United States there is already a funding crisis,
Not for government.
And a close look at actual monetary operations shows government best thought of as spending first and then borrowing or collecting taxes. Any constraints are necessarily self imposed (debt ceilings, no overdraft at Fed provisions, paygo policy).
and they will have to sell a lot more bonds next year to fund the bailout packages that have already been signed off,” Hennecke told CNBC.
No, the Fed government sells bonds after they spend, not in order to spend.
In order to solve or stem the economic slowdown, Hennecke suggested the US would have to radically reduce spending across all sectors and recall all its troops from around the world.
No, to stem the slowdown the US has to increase its deficit- increase spending and/or cut taxes.
Fortunately, this is already underway via the ‘automatic stabilizers’ as tax revenue slows and transfer payments increase.
Unfortunately we still don’t have the good sense to do this proactively.
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Morris wrote:
>
> Your theories are quite interesting- why wouldn’t the G20 announce
> this sort of massive WW stimulus package of say, 10 trillion dollars to
> restart all local economies?
>
They might.
Two points:
1. Deficits need to be ongoing to sustain the financial equity that supports credit structures. It’s not just a matter of ‘jump starting’ though that certainly doesn’t hurt.
We got into this mess by letting deficits get too low. We have yet to recover from the surplus years of the late 90’s that reduced private sector financial equity by maybe a trillion USD, back when that was a lot of money.
2. Any nation is better off by doing it unilaterally in sufficient quantity to restore output and employment. The last thing anyone needs is foreign consumers competing for scarce resources.
[top]
Wonderful, and the others aren’t much better. All seem to agree that in the long run deficits are counterproductive:
Dear President-elect Obama: Here’s How to Get the Economy out of the Ditch
Wharton management professor Heather Berry notes that in his campaign, Obama “offered tax cuts for working class families, expanded health care coverage and investing in clean energy technologies as priorities. However, he inherits a deficit that will make multiple priorities difficult to achieve…. Obama will need to figure out not only which programs and legislative initiatives are most important, but also how to pay for these programs. One issue that Obama will have to face in his first year is middle class tax cuts given that the Bush tax cuts were temporary and will need to be extended in 2009.”
[top]
Dear Philip,
Yes, there is a general shortage of aggregate demand.
However, if any one nation uses a fiscal adjustment to restore demand it will be that much better off if the rest of the world does not increase its aggregate demand.
Fiscal adjustments, much like imports, provide benefits and not costs.
Any unilateral fiscal response will restore both domestic output and employment as well as increase imports from nations who continue to suffer from a lack of aggregate demand.
The idea that there is a need for international coordination is continued evidence of a lack of understanding of the world’s monetary systems.
All the best,
Warren
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Prof. P. wrote:
>
> Dear Warren,
>
> Many thanks.
>
> What you suggest is very true. But not just in the US. Here in the UK
> and practically everywhere else in the world this is very urgent and a bit
> overdue. Do you not agree? Would anything along these lines come out
> from the meeting of the G20 over the weekend, I wonder.
>
> Best wishes, Philip
>
[top]
(email exchange)
Yes, thanks, seems he doesn’t fully grasp what the swaps are about?
Seems none of them do.
With oil going down the US will spend less on imports making USD harder to get overseas, keeping the USD relatively strong and exacerbating the foreign sector USD squeeze.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:44 PM, J A wrote:
>
> In his speech, Mr. Kohn said some special lending facilities, such as a
> program for the commercial-paper market, “are clearly emergency
> operations only” and would be wound down. Some of the Fed’s
> temporary lending programs such as currency swaps with other central
> banks and auctions for credit at the Fed’s discount window might
> become permanent, he said.
>
[top]
“During the two weeks that Congress considered the legislation, market conditions worsened considerably. It was clear to me by the time the bill was signed on October 3rd that we needed to act quickly and forcefully, and that purchasing troubled assetsâ€â€Âour initial focusâ€â€Âwould take time to implement and would not be sufficient given the severity of the problem. In consultation with the Federal Reserve, I determined that the most timely, effective step to improve credit market conditions was to strengthen bank balance sheets quickly through direct purchases of equity in banks.”
He knew this before the bill was signed and didn’t mention it?
[top]
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 11.9% |
Prior | -20.3% |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 260.90 |
Prior | 303.10 |
Revised | n/a |
Up some, but still very low.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 1075.40 |
Prior | 1489.40 |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | -$57.0B |
Actual | -$56.5B |
Prior | -$59.1B |
Revised | n/a |
Slowly falling as crude prices came down.
Karim writes:
Survey | n/a |
Actual | -6.0% |
Prior | -1.7% |
Revised | n/a |
Exports and imports (below) down as world economy slows.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | -5.6% |
Prior | -2.2% |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 8.8% |
Prior | 16.3% |
Revised | n/a |
Exports and imports (below) still up year over year but probably not for long.
Survey | n/a |
Actual | 6.9% |
Prior | 13.6% |
Revised | n/a |
Survey | 480K |
Actual | 516K |
Prior | 481K |
Revised | 484K |
In to recession territory as expected.
Karim writes:
These are truly awful numbers
Survey | 3825K |
Actual | 3897K |
Prior | 3843K |
Revised | 3832K |
Moving into recession levels as expected.
[top]
(email exchange)
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:31 AM, John wrote:
>
> Here is support for recent reviews and portfolio positions.
>
Yes, thanks, and ridiculous, of course. Comments below:
Uncle Sam’s Credit Line Running Out?
By Randall W. Forsyth
The yield curve and credit-default swaps tell the same story: The U.S. can’t borrow trillions without paying a price.
Not saying that at all!
What was once unthinkable has come to pass this year: massive bailouts by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, with the extension of billions of the taxpayers’ and the central bank’s credit in so many new and untested schemes that you can’t tell your acronyms or abbreviations without a scorecard.
Even more unbelievable is that some of the recipients of staggering sums are coming back for a second round. Or that the queue of petitioners grows by the day.
But what happens if the requests begin to strain the credit line of the world’s most creditworthy borrower, the U.S. government itself? Unthinkable?
Yes, government spends first, then borrows.
Trillions are no hyperbole. The Treasury is set to borrow $550 billion in the current quarter alone and $368 billion in the first quarter of 2009. “Near-term pressures on Treasury finances are much more intense than we had thought,” Goldman Sachs economists commented when the government announced its borrowing projections last week.
Define ‘intense’ please…
It may finally be catching up with Uncle Sam. That’s what the yield curve may be whispering. But some economists are too deaf, or dumb, to get it.
The yield curve reflects anticipated Fed funds rate targets plus ‘technicals’ which can include misguided risk perceptions.
But the Treasury has not needed to issue longer term maturities. It can do it all in 3 month bills or even shorter maturities.
Treasury securities function to ‘offset operating factors’ and provide interest bear accounts as alternatives to the interest rate now paid on excess reserves.
And any constraints on government spending are self imposed.
[top]
Europeans worry a lot more about inflation from falling currencies than the Fed does.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Milo wrote:
>
BOE’s King Says He Has No Desire for ‘Sharp’ Drop in the Pound
The following are comments by BoE policy makers on inflation, economic growth and interest rates. Governor Mervyn King and colleagues made the remarks at a press conference following the central bank’s inflation report.
“Clearly if sterling falls far enough this will be a concern and it will have an impact on inflation. It’s not surprising that it’s fallen in the past year. We started by going into this with a significant trade deficit. We are seeing a rebalancing of the world economy.”
“That can be a helpful part of rebalancing the economy, provided it doesn’t affect our ability to meet the inflation target. It’s something we keep a very careful eye on. We have no wish to see it fall very sharply.”
“We have to accept that some fall back from the level we saw in 2007 is part of the rebalancing. Central bankers are prepared to worry almost every day, and I’m prepared for that.”
Regarding the current value of the pound, the bank’s Chief Economist Charles Bean said:
“That very considerable stimulus from the exchange rate should help to pull the economy out of its slow period.”
[top]